Literature DB >> 18616837

A novel method to remotely measure food intake of free-living individuals in real time: the remote food photography method.

Corby K Martin1, Hongmei Han, Sandra M Coulon, H Raymond Allen, Catherine M Champagne, Stephen D Anton.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to report the first reliability and validity tests of the remote food photography method (RFPM), which consists of camera-enabled cell phones with data transfer capability. Participants take and transmit photographs of food selection and plate waste to researchers/clinicians for analysis. Following two pilot studies, adult participants (n 52; BMI 20-35 kg/m2 inclusive) were randomly assigned to the dine-in or take-out group. Energy intake (EI) was measured for 3 d. The dine-in group ate lunch and dinner in the laboratory. The take-out group ate lunch in the laboratory and dinner in free-living conditions (participants received a cooler with pre-weighed food that they returned the following morning). EI was measured with the RFPM and by directly weighing foods. The RFPM was tested in laboratory and free-living conditions. Reliability was tested over 3 d and validity was tested by comparing directly weighed EI to EI estimated with the RFPM using Bland-Altman analysis. The RFPM produced reliable EI estimates over 3 d in laboratory (r 0.62; P < 0.0001) and free-living (r 0.68; P < 0.0001) conditions. Weighed EI correlated highly with EI estimated with the RFPM in laboratory and free-living conditions (r>0.93; P < 0.0001). In two laboratory-based validity tests, the RFPM underestimated EI by - 4.7 % (P = 0.046) and - 5.5 % (P = 0.076). In free-living conditions, the RFPM underestimated EI by - 6.6 % (P = 0.017). Bias did not differ by body weight or age. The RFPM is a promising new method for accurately measuring the EI of free-living individuals. Error associated with the method is small compared with self-report methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18616837      PMCID: PMC2626133          DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508027438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  28 in total

Review 1.  Markers of the validity of reported energy intake.

Authors:  M Barbara E Livingstone; Alison E Black
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Validity and reliability of a dietary assessment method: the application of a digital camera with a mobile phone card attachment.

Authors:  Da-Hong Wang; Michiko Kogashiwa; Sachiko Ohta; Shohei Kira
Journal:  J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo)       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Comparison of digital photography to weighed and visual estimation of portion sizes.

Authors:  Donald A Williamson; H Raymond Allen; Pamela Davis Martin; Anthony J Alfonso; Bonnie Gerald; Alice Hunt
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2003-09

4.  Personal digital assistants are comparable to traditional diaries for dietary self-monitoring during a weight loss program.

Authors:  Bethany A Yon; Rachel K Johnson; Jean Harvey-Berino; Beth Casey Gold; Alan B Howard
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2007-01-10

5.  Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intake.

Authors:  A H Goris; M S Westerterp-Plantenga; K R Westerterp
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 6.  Assessing dietary intake in the management of obesity.

Authors:  P M O'Neil
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2001-12

7.  Measurement of children's food intake with digital photography and the effects of second servings upon food intake.

Authors:  Corby K Martin; Robert L Newton; Stephen D Anton; H Raymond Allen; Anthony Alfonso; Hongmei Han; Tiffany Stewart; Melinda Sothern; Donald A Williamson
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2006-04-27

8.  The application of a handheld personal digital assistant with camera and mobile phone card (Wellnavi) to the general population in a dietary survey.

Authors:  Shigeshi Kikunaga; Tomoe Tin; Genji Ishibashi; Da-Hong Wang; Shohei Kira
Journal:  J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo)       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  A comparison of self-reported energy intake with total energy expenditure estimated by accelerometer and basal metabolic rate in African-American women with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Carmen D Samuel-Hodge; Louise M Fernandez; Carlos F Henríquez-Roldán; Larry F Johnston; Thomas C Keyserling
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Estimating under-reporting of energy intake in dietary surveys using an individualised method.

Authors:  Kirsten L Rennie; Andy Coward; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 3.718

View more
  97 in total

Review 1.  Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing.

Authors:  N V Dhurandhar; D Schoeller; A W Brown; S B Heymsfield; D Thomas; T I A Sørensen; J R Speakman; M Jeansonne; D B Allison
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Validity and feasibility of a digital diet estimation method for use with preschool children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Theresa A Nicklas; Carol E O'Neil; Janice Stuff; Lora Suzanne Goodell; Yan Liu; Corby K Martin
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Validity of a Digital Diet Estimation Method for Use with Preschool Children.

Authors:  Theresa Nicklas; Noemi G Islam; Rabab Saab; Rebecca Schulin; Yan Liu; Nancy F Butte; John W Apolzan; Candice A Myers; Corby K Martin
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.910

4.  Food Photography Is Not an Accurate Measure of Energy Intake in Obese, Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Jasper Most; Porsha M Vallo; Abby D Altazan; Linda Anne Gilmore; Elizabeth F Sutton; Loren E Cain; Jeffrey H Burton; Corby K Martin; Leanne M Redman
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Resistant Starch Has No Effect on Appetite and Food Intake in Individuals with Prediabetes.

Authors:  Ursula White; Courtney M Peterson; Robbie A Beyl; Corby K Martin; Eric Ravussin
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  Efficacy of SmartLoss, a smartphone-based weight loss intervention: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Corby K Martin; Anastasia C Miller; Diana M Thomas; Catherine M Champagne; Hongmei Han; Timothy Church
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Photo-assisted recall increases estimates of energy and macronutrient intake in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Lauren T Ptomey; Stephen D Herrmann; Jaehoon Lee; Debra K Sullivan; Mary F Rondon; Joseph E Donnelly
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  Video chat technology to remotely quantify dietary, supplement and medication adherence in clinical trials.

Authors:  Courtney M Peterson; John W Apolzan; Courtney Wright; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Quantification of food intake using food image analysis.

Authors:  Corby K Martin; Sertan Kaya; Bahadir K Gunturk
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

10.  Assessing Mealtime Macronutrient Content: Patient Perceptions Versus Expert Analyses via a Novel Phone App.

Authors:  Melanie B Gillingham; Zoey Li; Roy W Beck; Peter Calhoun; Jessica Castle; Mark Clements; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle; Robin L Gal; Peter Jacobs; Susana R Patton; Michael R Rickels; Michael Riddell; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 6.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.