Literature DB >> 30826024

Gating Approaches in Cardiac PET Imaging.

Martin Lyngby Lassen1, Jacek Kwiecinski2, Piotr J Slomka3.   

Abstract

Cardiac PET provides high sensitivity and high negative predictive value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and cardiomyopathies. Cardiac, respiratory as well as bulk patient motion have detrimental effects on thoracic PET imaging, in particular on cardiovascular PET imaging where the motion can affect the PET images quantitatively as well as qualitatively. Gating can ameliorate the unfavorable impact of motion additionally enabling evaluation of left ventricular systolic function. In this article, the authors review the recent advances in gating approaches and highlight the advances in data-driven approaches, which hold promise in motion detection without the need for complex hardware setup.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac gating; Cardiac imaging; PET/CT imaging; PET/MR imaging; Respiratory gating

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30826024      PMCID: PMC6793993          DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2018.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PET Clin        ISSN: 1556-8598


  72 in total

1.  Comparison of measures of left ventricular function from electrocardiographically gated 82Rb PET with contrast-enhanced CT ventriculography: a hybrid PET/CT analysis.

Authors:  Ankit Chander; Michele Brenner; Riikka Lautamäki; Corina Voicu; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Self-gated MRI motion modeling for respiratory motion compensation in integrated PET/MRI.

Authors:  Robert Grimm; Sebastian Fürst; Michael Souvatzoglou; Christoph Forman; Jana Hutter; Isabel Dregely; Sibylle I Ziegler; Berthold Kiefer; Joachim Hornegger; Kai Tobias Block; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 3.  Advances in SPECT and PET Hardware.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Tinsu Pan; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 4.  18F-FDG PET/CT for the assessment of myocardial sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Hicham Skali; Allison R Schulman; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Impact of pharmacological stress agent on patient motion during rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion PET/CT.

Authors:  Matthew J Memmott; Christine M Tonge; Kimberley J Saint; Parthiban Arumugam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala; Jolene Meserve; Georges El Fakhri; Arkadiusz Sitek; Stephen C Moore
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  The impact of respiratory motion on tumor quantification and delineation in static PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Chi Liu; Larry A Pierce; Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Impact of point spread function modeling and time-of-flight on myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements for rubidium-82 cardiac PET.

Authors:  Ian S Armstrong; Christine M Tonge; Parthiban Arumugam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Cardiac sarcoidosis-state of the art review.

Authors:  Edward Hulten; Saira Aslam; Michael Osborne; Siddique Abbasi; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-02

10.  Motion Correction of 18F-NaF PET for Imaging Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques.

Authors:  Mathieu Rubeaux; Nikhil V Joshi; Marc R Dweck; Alison Fletcher; Manish Motwani; Louise E Thomson; Guido Germano; Damini Dey; Debiao Li; Daniel S Berman; David E Newby; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.

Authors:  Julian M M Rogasch; Frank Hofheinz; Lutz van Heek; Conrad-Amadeus Voltin; Ronald Boellaard; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10

2.  Estimation of optimal number of gates in dual gated 18F-FDG cardiac PET.

Authors:  R Klén; J Teuho; T Noponen; K Thielemans; E Hoppela; E Lehtonen; H T Sipila; M Teräs; J Knuuti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Advances in Quantitative Analysis of 18F-Sodium Fluoride Coronary Imaging.

Authors:  Jacek Kwiecinski; Martin Lyngby Lassen; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.488

4.  Triple-gated motion and blood pool clearance corrections improve reproducibility of coronary 18F-NaF PET.

Authors:  Martin Lyngby Lassen; Jacek Kwiecinski; Damini Dey; Sebastien Cadet; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Philip D Adamson; Alastair J Moss; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Cardiovascular 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison study.

Authors:  Jack P M Andrews; Gillian MacNaught; Alastair J Moss; Mhairi K Doris; Tania Pawade; Philip D Adamson; Edwin J R van Beek; Christophe Lucatelli; Martin L Lassen; Philip M Robson; Zahi A Fayad; Jacek Kwiecinski; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman; David E Newby; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.952

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.