Literature DB >> 30825873

Teleneurology service provided via tablet technology: 3-year outcomes and physician satisfaction.

Kelly Harper1, Megan McLeod2, Summer K Brown3, Georgia Wilson4, Maxim Turchan5, Emily M Gittings6, Derek Riebau7, Mark Baker8, Eli Zimmerman9, David Charles10.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to demonstrate that teleneurology consultations conducted via tablet technology are an efficient and cost-effective means of managing acute neurologic emergencies at community-based hospitals and that utilizing such technology yields high community physician satisfaction.
METHOD: During a 39-month period, Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Tennessee USA, provided teleneurology services to 10 community-based hospitals that lacked adequate neurology coverage. Hospitalists at one community-based hospital were not comfortable treating any patient with a neurologic symptom, resulting in 100% of those patients being transferred. This facility now retains more than 60% of neurology patients. For less than US$1200, these hospitals were able to meet the only capital expenditure required to launch this service: the purchase of handheld tablet computers. Real-time teleneurology consultations were conducted via tablet using two-way video conferencing, radiologic image sharing, and medical record documentation. Community physicians were regularly surveyed to assess satisfaction.
RESULTS: From February 2014 to May 2017, 3626 teleneurology consultations were conducted. Community physicians, in partnership with neurologists, successfully managed 87% of patients at the community-based hospital. Only 13% of patients required transfer to another facility for a higher level of care. The most common diagnoses included stroke (34%), seizure (11%), and headache/migraine (6%). The average time for the neurologist to answer a request for consultation page and connect with the community physician was 10.6 minutes. Ninety-one percent of community physicians were satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the overall service.
CONCLUSION: In the assessment of neurology patients, tablets are a more cost-effective alternative to traditional telehealth technologies. The devices promote efficiency in consultations through ease of use and low transfer rates, and survey results indicate community physician satisfaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  USA; seizure; stroke; telehealth; telemedicine; neurology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30825873     DOI: 10.22605/RRH4743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rural Remote Health        ISSN: 1445-6354            Impact factor:   1.759


  6 in total

1.  Synchronous neurology-primary care collaboration in a medical home.

Authors:  Nathan P Young; David B Burkholder; Lindsey M Philpot; Paul M McKie; Jon O Ebbert
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2020-10

2.  Inpatient Telemedicine for Neurology Consultation at Satellite Hospitals: Patient and Provider Perspectives.

Authors:  Juneja Pj; Tolczyk Am; Strowd Re; Strauss Ld; Graham R; Burton L; Michael C; Ezzeddine M; Pharr Ep; Boggs J; Kumar S; O'Donovan C; Tegeler Ct; Amy K Guzik
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Management of Rheumatic Diseases During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Veterans Affairs Survey of Rheumatologists.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John S Richards; Elizabeth Chang; Amy Joseph; Bernard Ng
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Evaluation and Feedback for Telehealth From Patients and Physicians During the Early Stage of COVID-19 Pandemic Period.

Authors:  James Yu; Summia Matin Afridi; Ashley C Cozart; Luis Isea; Jian Guan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-01-11

Review 5.  Telehealth in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research.

Authors:  Xinran Maria Xiang; Jacqueline Bernard
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 6.  Telemedicine application to headache: a critical review.

Authors:  Emanuele Spina; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Antonio Russo; Francesca Trojsi; Rosa Iodice; Stefano Tozza; Aniello Iovino; Francesco Iodice; Gianmarco Abbadessa; Francesco di Lorenzo; Giuseppina Miele; Elisabetta Maida; Giovanni Cerullo; Maddalena Sparaco; Marcello Silvestro; Letizia Leocani; Simona Bonavita; Fiore Manganelli; Luigi Lavorgna
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.830

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.