Literature DB >> 33585121

Evaluation and Feedback for Telehealth From Patients and Physicians During the Early Stage of COVID-19 Pandemic Period.

James Yu1, Summia Matin Afridi2, Ashley C Cozart3, Luis Isea1, Jian Guan1.   

Abstract

Purpose Many health care providers adopted telehealth during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This unprecedented transformation in medical practice posed challenges to both physicians and patients. However, little is known about the adaptation of attendings, residents, and patients to this new normal. Thus, a survey was sent out to investigate the feedback of both physicians and patients on telehealth.  Methods Surveys were administered via phone call to patients and electronic survey to physicians at an internal medicine resident clinic in one tertiary community hospital from April to June 2020. Demographic information and assessment of overall experience, satisfaction, and concerns of telehealth were collected. Statistical analyses were performed to compare feedback between patients and physicians. Results Fifty patients and 45 physicians participated in the study. Eighty-four percent of patients were first- or second-time users, and 50% of patients were older than 60 years. Eighty-four percent of patients were very or extremely satisfied with telehealth, while 72% wanted to continue telehealth in the future. Ninety-four percent of patients believed that their concerns were adequately addressed, but 14% experiencing technical issues. Physicians' feedback to telehealth was less positive than the patients'. More than 60% of physicians experienced technical issues, and nearly 60% of physicians were neutral or not satisfied with telehealth. Nearly 50% of physicians had difficulty transitioning to telehealth, while only 29% believed that their patients' complaints were adequately addressed. Most physicians had to schedule in-person visits after telehealth. Patients were more satisfied with telehealth than physicians (84% vs. 42%; p<0.001) and were more likely to believe that their concerns were properly addressed by telehealth (94% vs. 29%; p<0.001).  Conclusion This survey revealed that patients were more satisfied with telehealth than physicians. Further research with a larger sample should be considered to confirm this conclusion, and subjective studies are needed to determine the imbalance of satisfaction.
Copyright © 2021, Yu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  covid19 pandemic; evaluation for telehealth; patients and physicians

Year:  2021        PMID: 33585121      PMCID: PMC7875567          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  17 in total

Review 1.  Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review.

Authors:  Isabel de la Torre-Díez; Miguel López-Coronado; Cesar Vaca; Jesús Saez Aguado; Carlos de Castro
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Building A Regulatory And Payment Framework Flexible Enough To Withstand Technological Progress.

Authors:  David Flannery; Robert Jarrin
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Mobile health solutions for the aging population: A systematic narrative analysis.

Authors:  Clemens Scott Kruse; Michael Mileski; Joshua Moreno
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.184

4.  Predictive factors of physicians' satisfaction with telemedicine services acceptance.

Authors:  Jonathan Kissi; Baozhen Dai; Courage Sk Dogbe; Jonathan Banahene; Oyeh Ernest
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Challenges And Opportunities Faced By Large Health Systems Implementing Telehealth.

Authors:  Chad Ellimoottil; Lawrence An; Meagan Moyer; Sarah Sossong; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Electronic communication improves access, but barriers to its widespread adoption remain.

Authors:  Tara F Bishop; Matthew J Press; Jayme L Mendelsohn; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Using telemedicine to provide pediatric subspecialty care to children with special health care needs in an underserved rural community.

Authors:  James P Marcin; Jeff Ellis; Roland Mawis; Eule Nagrampa; Thomas S Nesbitt; Robert J Dimand
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Work Group Report: COVID-19: Unmasking Telemedicine.

Authors:  Nathan Hare; Priya Bansal; Sakina S Bajowala; Stuart L Abramson; Sheva Chervinskiy; Robert Corriel; David W Hauswirth; Sujani Kakumanu; Reena Mehta; Quratulain Rashid; Michael R Rupp; Jennifer Shih; Giselle S Mosnaim
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-06-27

9.  Telemedicine in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Josep Vidal-Alaball; Ruthy Acosta-Roja; Nuria Pastor Hernández; Unai Sanchez Luque; Danielle Morrison; Silvia Narejos Pérez; Jesús Perez-Llano; Angels Salvador Vèrges; Francesc López Seguí
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 1.137

10.  Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19.

Authors:  Joseph A Lewnard; Nathan C Lo
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 25.071

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Facilitators and Barriers to the Adoption of Telemedicine During the First Year of COVID-19: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katharine Heinemann; Clemens Kruse
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 2.  Healthcare Professionals' Experience of Performing Digital Care Visits-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ieva Lampickienė; Nadia Davoody
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Patients' Perspectives on the Shift to Telemedicine in Primary and Behavioral Health Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Carolyn A Berry; Lorraine Kwok; Rachel Massar; Ji Eun Chang; Zoe Lindenfeld; Donna R Shelley; Stephanie L Albert
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.473

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.