Literature DB >> 30822756

Reliability of motor and sensory neural decoding by threshold crossings for intracortical brain-machine interface.

Jun Dai1, Peng Zhang, Hongji Sun, Xin Qiao, Yuwei Zhao, Jinxu Ma, Shaohua Li, Jin Zhou, Changyong Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For intracortical neurophysiological studies, spike sorting is an important procedure to isolate single units for analyzing specific functions. However, whether spike sorting is necessary or not for neural decoding applications is controversial. Several studies showed that using threshold crossings (TC) instead of spike sorting could also achieve a similar satisfactory performance. However, such studies were limited in similar behavioral tasks, and the neural signal source mainly focused on the motor-related cortical regions. It is not certain if this conclusion is applicable to other situations. Therefore, we compared the performance of TC and spike sorting in neural decoding with more comprehensive paradigms and parameters. APPROACH: Two rhesus macaques implanted with Utah or floating microelectrode arrays (FMAs) in motor or sensory-related cortical regions were trained to perform a motor or a sensory task. Data from each monkey were preprocessed with three different schemes: TC, automatic sorting (AS), and manual sorting (MS). A support vector machine was used as the decoder, and the decoding accuracy was used for evaluating the performance of three preprocessing methods. Different neural signal sources, different decoders, and related parameters and decoding stability were further tested to systematically compare three preprocessing methods. MAIN
RESULTS: TC could achieve a similar (-4.5 RMS threshold) or better (-3.0 RMS threshold) decoding performance compared to the other two sorting methods in the motor or sensory tasks even if the neural signal sources or decoder-related parameters were changed. Moreover, TC was much more stable in neural decoding across sessions and robust to changes of threshold. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicated that spike-firing patterns could be stably extracted through TC from multiple cortices in both motor and sensory neural decoding applications. Considering the stability of TC, it might be more suitable for neural decoding compared to sorting methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30822756     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab0bfb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  5 in total

1.  A neural network for online spike classification that improves decoding accuracy.

Authors:  Deepa Issar; Ryan C Williamson; Sanjeev B Khanna; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  From End to End: Gaining, Sorting, and Employing High-Density Neural Single Unit Recordings.

Authors:  Réka Barbara Bod; János Rokai; Domokos Meszéna; Richárd Fiáth; István Ulbert; Gergely Márton
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Decoding rapidly presented visual stimuli from prefrontal ensembles without report nor post-perceptual processing.

Authors:  Joachim Bellet; Marion Gay; Abhilash Dwarakanath; Bechir Jarraya; Timo van Kerkoerle; Stanislas Dehaene; Theofanis I Panagiotaropoulos
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2022-02-24

4.  The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex.

Authors:  Luke Bashford; Isabelle Rosenthal; Spencer Kellis; Kelsie Pejsa; Daniel Kramer; Brian Lee; Charles Liu; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Home Use of a Percutaneous Wireless Intracortical Brain-Computer Interface by Individuals With Tetraplegia.

Authors:  John D Simeral; Thomas Hosman; Jad Saab; Sharlene N Flesher; Marco Vilela; Brian Franco; Jessica N Kelemen; David M Brandman; John G Ciancibello; Paymon G Rezaii; Emad N Eskandar; David M Rosler; Krishna V Shenoy; Jaimie M Henderson; Arto V Nurmikko; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.538

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.