Literature DB >> 30820604

Promising outcomes of hip mosaicplasty by minimally invasive anterior approach using osteochondral autografts from the ipsilateral femoral head.

Maria-Roxana Viamont-Guerra1,2, Nicolas Bonin2, Olivier May3, Augustin Le Viguelloux2, Mo Saffarini4, Frédéric Laude1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent studies demonstrated promising results of mosaicplasty for femoral head osteochondral lesions using posterior and lateral approaches. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of mosaicplasty using ipsilateral femoral head autografts by minimally invasive anterior approach. The hypothesis was that this surgical technique would grant satisfactory clinical outcomes with considerable improvement of clinical scores.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 27 mosaicplasties, to treat osteochondral lesions of the femoral head measuring 1.6 ± 0.7 cm2 (range 0.8-4.0) in patients aged 28.7 ± 7.4 years (range 19-44), was evaluated using the mHHS and WOMAC scores at minimum follow-up of 12 months. All patients were operated by minimally invasive anterior (Hueter) approach and osteochondral plugs were harvested from the non-weight-bearing portion of the femoral head. Adjuvant osteoplasty was necessary for some patients at the acetabulum (n = 3), femur (n = 14) or both (n = 2).
RESULTS: Three patients were excluded due to concomitant periacetabular osteotomies or shelf procedures, one patient could not be reached, and another was revised to THA. This left 22 patients for clinical assessment at 39.4 ± 23.2 months (12.0-90.2). Their mHHS improved from 56.3 ± 12.6 to 88.4 ± 9.9, and WOMAC improved from 45.1 ± 16.9 to 80.6 ± 13.0. Two patients (8.4%) underwent arthroscopy at 13 and 30 months to remove painful residual cam-type deformities. Regression analyses revealed that net improvement in WOMAC decreased with lesion size (p = 0.002) and increased with follow-up (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Hip mosaicplasty using autografts from the ipsilateral femoral head, performed by minimally invasive anterior approach, granted satisfactory outcomes and functional improvements. Caution is, however, advised for lesions > 2 cm2 (diameter > 16 mm) which may be a threshold limit for this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip preserving surgery; Mosaicplasty; Osteochondral grafts; Osteochondral lesions

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30820604     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05442-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  37 in total

1.  Revision total hip arthroplasty performed through the Hueter interval.

Authors:  Nicholas H Mast; Frédéric Laude
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Osteochondral mosaicplasty of the femoral head.

Authors:  Julien Girard; Thibaut Roumazeille; Mazen Sakr; Henri Migaud
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 4.  Joint-preserving surgical options for management of chondral injuries of the hip.

Authors:  Youssef F El Bitar; Dror Lindner; Timothy J Jackson; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Three-dimensional polyethylene wear of a press-fit titanium prosthesis. Factors influencing generation of polyethylene debris.

Authors:  P A Devane; J G Horne; K Martin; G Coldham; B Krause
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Long-term result of mosaicplasty for femoral head osteochondral lesion: a case report with 8 years follow-up.

Authors:  Önder İsmet Kılıçoğlu; Gökhan Polat; Ali Erşen; Fevzi Birişik
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Revision hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; Mara L Schenker; Karen K Briggs; David A Kuppersmith; R Brian Maxwell; Allston J Stubbs
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Case report: Fresh-stored osteochondral allograft for treatment of osteochondritis dissecans the femoral head.

Authors:  Korboi N Evans; Bertram C Providence
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Arthroscopic-assisted retrograde mosaicplasty for an osteochondral defect of the femoral head without performing surgical hip dislocation.

Authors:  Onur Kocadal; Budak Akman; Melih Güven; Uğur Şaylı
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-06-02

10.  Benign Aggressive Lesions of Femoral Head and Neck: Is Salvage Possible?

Authors:  Yogesh Panchwagh; Sujit K Joshi; Parag K Sancheti
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  An evidence-based update on the management of articular cartilage defects in the hip.

Authors:  Karadi Hari Sunil Kumar; Malgorzata Garner; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-03-17

2.  Unusual apical femoral head deformity treated by hip arthroscopy and tunnel drilling through femoral head: a case report.

Authors:  Boris Morattel; Nicolas Bonin
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2021-06-23

3.  Osteochondral Allograft Implantation Using the Smith-Peterson (Anterior) Approach for Chondral Lesions of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Chen; Philip J Rosinsky; Jacob Shapira; David R Maldonado; Cynthia Kyin; Ajay C Lall; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-02-07

4.  Bilateral femoral head reshaping and mosaicplasty in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease residual deformity.

Authors:  Ángel Palazón-Quevedo; María Galán-Olleros; Rosa M Egea-Gámez
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2021-06-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.