Literature DB >> 30820509

Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: Prevalence and Risk of Cognitive Impairment in a Population Studied in the Mexican Health and Aging Study 2012-2015.

S G Aguilar-Navarro1, A J Mimenza-Alvarado, J E Aguilar-Esquivel, S G Yeverino-Castro, T Juárez-Cedillo, S Mejía-Arango.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of Motoric Cognitive Risk (MCR) syndrome, describe associated risk factors and to determine the risk of progression to cognitive impairment after three years of follow-up, in a sample of Mexican older adults.
DESIGN: A prospective panel study of health and aging in Mexico. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Baseline and follow-up information was obtained from the Mexican Health and Aging Study's 2012 and 2015 waves. A total of 726 subjects aged 60 years or older with normal cognition at baseline were classified into 4 groups: 1) with MCR, 2) with memory complaint only, 3) with slow gait speed only and, 4) without MCR. Cox regression analysis controlling for confounder factors was performed to determine the risk of progression to cognitive impairment in the MCR group. MEASURES: Data such as gait speed, functional status and cognitive performance (standardized by age and sex in Mexican population) was collected.
RESULTS: MCR prevalence was 14.3%. When compared with non-MCR subjects, the presence of MCR was associated with older age (p<0.01), lower educational status (p=0.05), having two or more comorbidities (p<0.05) and diabetes mellitus diagnosis (p<0.05). At follow-up and after adjusting for confounders, MCR was associated with a 2.4-fold increased risk (95% CI: 1.28-4.26, p=.000) of cognitive impairment.
CONCLUSIONS: MCR syndrome increases the risk of cognitive impairment in Mexican older adults. Simple measurements such as gait evaluation in subjects with memory complaints could allow early identification of those at risk of developing cognitive impairment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive complaints; activities of daily living; cognitive impairment; older adult; slow gait

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30820509      PMCID: PMC7038635          DOI: 10.1007/s12603-019-1160-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  32 in total

Review 1.  Should we screen for Alzheimer's disease? A review of the evidence for and against screening Alzheimer's disease in primary care practice.

Authors:  Paul R Solomon; Cynthia A Murphy
Journal:  Geriatrics       Date:  2005-11

2.  Working-delayed memory difference detects mild cognitive impairment without being affected by age and education.

Authors:  Alexandra Economou; Sokratis Papageorgiou; Clementine Karageorgiou
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  [Mexican older adults with a wide socioeconomic perspective: health and aging].

Authors:  Rebeca Wong; Mónica Espinoza; Alberto Palloni
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2007

4.  Preclinical prediction of AD using neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  M S Albert; M B Moss; R Tanzi; K Jones
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Criterion validity of the cross-cultural cognitive examination in Japan.

Authors:  N Wolfe; Y Imai; C Otani; H Nagatani; K Hasegawa; K Sugimoto; Y Tanaka; Y Kuroda; G Glosser; M L Albert
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1992-07

6.  [Validity and reliability of the screening questionnaire for geriatric depression used in the Mexican Health and Age Study].

Authors:  Sara Gloria Aguilar-Navarro; Alejandro Fuentes-Cantú; José Alberto Avila-Funes; Emilio José García-Mayo
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

Review 7.  Update on apraxia.

Authors:  Rachel Goldmann Gross; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  [Cognitive impairment and associated factors in older adults in Mexico].

Authors:  Silvia Mejía-Arango; Alejandro Miguel-Jaimes; Antonio Villa; Liliana Ruiz-Arregui; Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2007

9.  Reduced mobility and physical activity as predictors of depressive symptoms among community-dwelling older adults: an eight-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Päivi Lampinen; Eino Heikkinen
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  [Factors associated with functional dependence in older adults: a secondary analysis of the National Study on Health and Aging, Mexico, 2001].

Authors:  Guadalupe Dorantes-Mendoza; José Alberto Avila-Funes; Silvia Mejía-Arango; Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2007-07
View more
  5 in total

1.  Non-memory subjective cognitive concerns predict incident motoric cognitive risk syndrome.

Authors:  C Nester; E Ayers; L Rabin; J Verghese
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 6.089

Review 2.  Motoric cognitive risk syndrome: Integration of two early harbingers of dementia in older adults.

Authors:  Richard D Semba; Qu Tian; Michelle C Carlson; Qian-Li Xue; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2020-01-26       Impact factor: 10.895

3.  The Mexican Cognitive Aging Ancillary Study (Mex-Cog): Study Design and Methods.

Authors:  Silvia Mejia-Arango; Rene Nevarez; Alejandra Michaels-Obregon; Belem Trejo-Valdivia; Laura Rosario Mendoza-Alvarado; Ana Luisa Sosa-Ortiz; Adrian Martinez-Ruiz; Rebeca Wong
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  The depressed frail phenotype as a risk factor for mortality in older adults: A prospective cohort in Peru.

Authors:  Gabriel A J Vasquez-Goñi; Basilio M Papuico-Romero; Diego Urrunaga-Pastor; Fernando M Runzer-Colmenares; José F Parodi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-12-20

5.  Prevalence and Correlates of Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Authors:  Anying Bai; Weihao Xu; Zhanyi Lin
Journal:  Front Aging       Date:  2022-06-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.