OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity and reliability of a geriatric depression questionnaire used in the Mexican Health and Age Study (MHAS). METHODS: The study was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ) clinic from May 2005 to March 2006. This depression screening nine-item questionnaire was validated using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) (fourth revised version) and Yesavage's 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) criteria. The instrument belongs to the MHAS, a prospective panel study of health and aging in Mexico. RESULTS: A total of 199 subjects 65 years of age and older participated in the validation process (median age= 79.5 years). MHAS questionnaire result was significantly correlated to the clinical depression diagnosis (p<0.001) and to the GDS-15 score (p<0.001). Internal consistency was adequate (alpha coefficient: 0.74). The cutoff point > or = 5/9 points yielded an 80.7% and 68.7% sensitivity and specificity respectively. The fidelity for the test retest was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient= 0.933). Finally, the Bland and Altman agreement points indicated a difference 0.22 percent points between test retest. CONCLUSION: The MHAS questionnaire is valid and trustworthy, and allows screening in the research field for the presence of depression in the elderly.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity and reliability of a geriatric depression questionnaire used in the Mexican Health and Age Study (MHAS). METHODS: The study was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ) clinic from May 2005 to March 2006. This depression screening nine-item questionnaire was validated using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) (fourth revised version) and Yesavage's 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) criteria. The instrument belongs to the MHAS, a prospective panel study of health and aging in Mexico. RESULTS: A total of 199 subjects 65 years of age and older participated in the validation process (median age= 79.5 years). MHAS questionnaire result was significantly correlated to the clinical depression diagnosis (p<0.001) and to the GDS-15 score (p<0.001). Internal consistency was adequate (alpha coefficient: 0.74). The cutoff point > or = 5/9 points yielded an 80.7% and 68.7% sensitivity and specificity respectively. The fidelity for the test retest was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient= 0.933). Finally, the Bland and Altman agreement points indicated a difference 0.22 percent points between test retest. CONCLUSION: The MHAS questionnaire is valid and trustworthy, and allows screening in the research field for the presence of depression in the elderly.
Authors: Luis García-Fabela; Efrén Melano-Carranza; Sara Aguilar-Navarro; Juan Miguel Antonio García-Lara; Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo; José Alberto Avila-Funes Journal: Rev Invest Clin Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.451
Authors: Carlos Díaz-Venegas; Rafael Samper-Ternent; Alejandra Michaels-Obregón; Rebeca Wong Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2018-11-18 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Tyler Bell; Ana Luisa Dávila; Olivio Clay; Kyriakos S Markides; Ross Andel; Michael Crowe Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Daniel S Reuland; Andrea Cherrington; Garth S Watkins; Daniel W Bradford; Roberto A Blanco; Bradley N Gaynes Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166