| Literature DB >> 30818857 |
Duangjai Tungmunnithum1,2,3, Laurine Garros4,5,6, Samantha Drouet7,8, Sullivan Renouard9, Eric Lainé10,11, Christophe Hano12,13.
Abstract
Painted nettle (Plectranthus scutellarioides (L.) R.Br.) is an ornamental plant belonging to Lamiaceae family, native of Asia. Its leaves constitute one of the richest sources of trans-rosmarinic acid, a well-known antioxidant and antimicrobial phenolic compound. These biological activities attract interest from the cosmetic industry and the demand for the development of green sustainable extraction processes. Here, we report on the optimization and validation of an ultrasound-assisted extraction (USAE) method using ethanol as solvent. Following preliminary single factor experiments, the identified limiting extraction parameters (i.e., ultrasound frequency, extraction duration, and ethanol concentration) were further optimized using a full factorial design approach. The method was then validated following the recommendations of the association of analytical communities (AOAC) to ensure the precision and accuracy of the method used to quantify trans-rosmarinic acid. Highest trans-rosmarinic acid content was obtained using pure ethanol as extraction solvent following a 45-minute extraction in an ultrasound bath operating at an ultrasound frequency of 30 kHz. The antioxidant (in vitro radical scavenging activity) and antimicrobial (directed toward Staphylococcus aureus ACTT6538) activities were significantly correlated with the trans-rosmarinic acid concentration of the extract evidencing that these key biological activities were retained following the extraction using this validated method. Under these conditions, 110.8 mg/g DW of trans-rosmarinic acid were extracted from lyophilized P. scutellarioides leaves as starting material evidencing the great potential of this renewable material for cosmetic applications. Comparison to other classical extraction methods evidenced a clear benefit of the present USAE method both in terms of yield and extraction duration.Entities:
Keywords: Lamiaceae; Plectranthus scutellarioides; antimicrobial; antioxidant; green extraction; trans-rosmarinic acid; ultrasound
Year: 2019 PMID: 30818857 PMCID: PMC6473734 DOI: 10.3390/plants8030050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1(a) Painted nettle (Plectranthus scutellarioides (L.) R.Br.) leaves morphology; (b) Chemical structures of p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid, p-hydrophenyllactic acid, dihydrophenyllactic acid, and trans-rosmarinic acid (picture taken by C.H.).
Figure 2RA contents extracted from P. scutellarioides leaves as of function of (a) ethanol concentration, (b) ultrasound frequency, (c) solvent to material ratio, (d) extraction temperature, and (e) extraction duration. For a complete description of the extraction conditions, see text. Values are means ± SD of 3 independent replicates. Different letters (a–d) represent significant differences between the various extraction conditions (p < 0.05).
Identities, code unit, coded levels and actual experimental values of the three independent variables.
| Independent variable | Code unit | Coded variable levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | ||
| Ethanol concentration (% | X1 | 50 | 75 | 100 |
| US frequency (kHz) | X2 | 15 | 30 | 45 |
| Extraction duration (min) | X3 | 15 | 30 | 45 |
1 % of ethanol concentration in mixture with HPLC grade ultrapure water.
Results of experimental design.
| Run ID | Run order | X1 | X2 | X3 | RA (mg/g DW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obs1 | 17 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 16.9 ± 2.6 |
| Obs2 | 24 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 53.2 ± 0.5 |
| Obs3 | 26 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 57.8 ± 6.0 |
| Obs4 | 21 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 18.7 ± 3.8 |
| Obs5 | 22 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 65.2 ± 5.0 |
| Obs6 | 6 | +1 | 0 | −1 | 66.5 ± 2.4 |
| Obs7 | 10 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 17.6 ± 4.3 |
| Obs8 | 27 | 0 | +1 | −1 | 78.2 ± 1.1 |
| Obs9 | 7 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 102.2 ± 1.15 |
| Obs10 | 18 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 19.2 ± 2.2 |
| Obs11 | 12 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 55.1 ± 2.5 |
| Obs12 | 8 | +1 | −1 | 0 | 72.6 ± 0.6 |
| Obs13 | 25 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 15.6 ± 0.1 |
| Obs14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.4 ± 7.4 |
| Obs15 | 16 | +1 | 0 | 0 | 91.6 ± 3.1 |
| Obs16 | 23 | −1 | +1 | 0 | 20.3 ± 2.5 |
| Obs17 | 11 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 66.3 ± 2.6 |
| Obs18 | 14 | +1 | +1 | 0 | 90.2 ± 1.3 |
| Obs19 | 15 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 16.9 ± 4.3 |
| Obs20 | 3 | 0 | −1 | +1 | 56.7 ± 1.9 |
| Obs21 | 13 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 62.6 ± 1.6 |
| Obs22 | 9 | −1 | 0 | +1 | 19.5 ± 0.5 |
| Obs23 | 5 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 91.1 ± 4.4 |
| Obs24 | 19 | +1 | 0 | +1 | 110.8 ± 4.5 * |
| Obs25 | 4 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 14.4 ± 1.1 |
| Obs26 | 20 | 0 | +1 | +1 | 66.7 ± 3.0 |
| Obs27 | 2 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 75.9 ± 2.6 |
Values are the mean ± RSD of three independent replicates except for *, which correspond to the highest RA content here determined by six independent experiments to confirm this value.
Statistical analysis of the regression coefficients.
| Source | Value | SD |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 73.22 | 5.279 | 13.871 | < 0.0001 *** |
| X1 | 31.74 | 2.444 | 12.988 | < 0.0001 *** |
| X2 | 6.70 | 2.444 | 2.743 | 0.014 * |
| X3 | 2.15 | 2.444 | 0.879 | 0.392 ns |
| X12 | −17.60 | 4.232 | −4.159 | 0.001 ** |
| X22 | −8.68 | 4.232 | −2.052 | 0.046 * |
| X32 | −0.65 | 4.232 | −0.153 | 0.880 ns |
| X1X2 | 6.34 | 2.993 | 2.118 | 0.049 * |
| X1X3 | 2.11 | 2.993 | 0.707 | 0.489 ns |
| X2X3 | −4.11 | 2.993 | −1.373 | 0.188 ns |
SD standard error; *** significant p < 0.001; ** significant p < 0.01; * significant p < 0.05; ns not significant.
ANOVA of the predicted model for USAE of RA from freeze-dried P. scutellarioides leaves.
| Source | Sum of square | df | Mean of square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 22074.5 | 9 | 2452.7 | 22.72 | < 0.0001 |
| Lack of fit | 1592.8 | 17 | 93.7 | 0.87 | 0.266 |
| Residual | 1827.1 | 17 | 107.5 | - | - |
| Pure Error | 234.3 | 0 | - | - | - |
| Cor. Error | 23901.6 | 26 | - | - | - |
| R2 | 0.924 | ||||
| R2 adj | 0.883 | ||||
| CV % | 0.79 |
df: degree of freedom; Cor. Error: corrected error; R2: determination coefficient; R2 adj: adjusted R2; CV variation coefficient value.
Figure 3Predicted surface response plots of the RA extraction yield as a function of (a) ultrasound frequency and ethanol concentration, (b) extraction duration and ethanol concentration, and (c) extraction duration and ultrasound frequency.
Validation parameters of the HPLC method.
| Equation | R2 | LOD | LOQ | Precision (%RSD) | Repeatability | Recovery | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intraday | Interday | ||||||
| y = 4.872x − 0.123 | 0.9998 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 0.48 | 0.94 | 3.5 | 2.8 |
Figure 4Hierarchical clustering analysis of RA contents and antioxidant (DPPH radical scavenging activity) and antimicrobial (growth inhibition of S. aureus ACTT6538) of the 27 extracts obtained following USAE of P. scutellarioides leaves.
Comparison between conventional heat reflux method and ultrasound-assisted extraction (USAE) of RA from P. scutellarioides leaves.
| RA content as a function of extraction method and time | Conventional Heat Reflux Extraction | USAE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extraction duration | 45 min | 90 min | 180 min | 45 min |
| RA content (mg/g DW) | 55.6 ± 3.1d | 79.7 ± 1.5c | 95.6 ± 2.2b | 110.8 ± 4.5a |
Values are the mean ± RSD of three independent replicates and different letters (a, b, c, d) indicate significant differences between conditions (p < 0.05).