Literature DB >> 30818414

Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age.

Aalaa Jawad1, Issrah Jawad, Nisreen A Alwan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social networking sites (SNSs) have great potential as a platform for public health interventions to address the unmet need for contraception.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions using SNSs to promote the uptake of and adherence to contraception in reproductive-age women. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and six other databases on January 2018. We also searched Google Scholar, key conference proceedings, checked the reference lists of included studies, and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised interventional studies (NRS) in women of reproductive age. SNSs requiring a social profile within a bounded or restricted-access system of shared connections were included. We also included trials that utilised SNSs only or as an adjunct to an intervention. Studies had to have a follow-up outcome assessment of at least three months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text studies, and extracted data from included studies. A third author was assigned to arbitrate areas of disagreement. Authors assessed risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We were unable to conduct a meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity of the study designs and outcome measures. MAIN
RESULTS: Of the 461 unique records found, only two studies met our inclusion criteria. Both studies were conducted in the USA and were at high risk of bias. One RCT included 2284 women exposed to a web-based SNS or nothing. The groups were no different post intervention in their self-reported consistency of contraceptive use or knowledge of the relative effectiveness of different methods. There was a small but significant increase in the use of more effective methods (long-acting reversible methods) at 12 months' follow-up.The second study, a cluster RCT with 1578 women, used a closed Facebook page showing sexual health content compared to a modified Facebook news page that avoided sexual health content. They found no differences in the use of condoms at last act of sexual intercourse at six months or the intention to use condoms between the intervention and control groups. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the prevalence of SNSs, we found little scientific evidence to support the use of SNSs to improve contraceptive use or adherence among women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30818414      PMCID: PMC6395225          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012521.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  22 in total

1.  Reducing at-risk adolescents' display of risk behavior on a social networking web site: a randomized controlled pilot intervention trial.

Authors:  Megan A Moreno; Ann Vanderstoep; Malcolm R Parks; Frederick J Zimmerman; Ann Kurth; Dimitri A Christakis
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2009-01

2.  Is a previous unplanned pregnancy a risk factor for a subsequent unplanned pregnancy?

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Jenifer E Allsworth; Colleen A Redding; Jeffrey D Blume; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Interventions using new digital media to improve adolescent sexual health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kylene Guse; Deb Levine; Summer Martins; Andrea Lira; Jenna Gaarde; Whitney Westmorland; Melissa Gilliam
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systematic and comprehensive analysis.

Authors:  Leontine Alkema; Vladimira Kantorova; Clare Menozzi; Ann Biddlecom
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The contraceptive revolution: focused efforts are still needed.

Authors:  John Cleland; Iqbal H Shah
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Sexual initiation, contraceptive use, and pregnancy among young adolescents.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Jesse M Philbin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Developing health promotion interventions on social networking sites: recommendations from The FaceSpace Project.

Authors:  Judy Gold; Alisa E Pedrana; Mark A Stoove; Shanton Chang; Steve Howard; Jason Asselin; Olivia Ilic; Colin Batrouney; Margaret E Hellard
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  A systematic examination of the use of online social networking sites for sexual health promotion.

Authors:  Judy Gold; Alisa E Pedrana; Rachel Sacks-Davis; Margaret E Hellard; Shanton Chang; Steve Howard; Louise Keogh; Jane S Hocking; Mark A Stoove
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  A Peer-Led, Social Media-Delivered, Safer Sex Intervention for Chinese College Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Wai Han Sun; Carlos King Ho Wong; William Chi Wai Wong
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  A randomised controlled trial of an intervention delivered by app instant messaging to increase the acceptability of effective contraception among young people in Tajikistan: study protocol.

Authors:  Ona McCarthy; Baptiste Leurent; Phil Edwards; Ravshan Tokhirov; Caroline Free
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  5 in total

1.  Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age.

Authors:  Aalaa Jawad; Issrah Jawad; Nisreen A Alwan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  Birth Control Connect: A randomized trial of an online group to disseminate contraceptive information.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Edith Fox; Anjana E Sharma; Jingwen Zhang; Sijia Yang; Damon Centola
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  'I feel like a person has a right to use a product to protect themselves…': a qualitative study of the risk-benefit calculus on women's contraceptive use and choice.

Authors:  Sofía L Carbone; Melissa Guillen; Jaime J Ramirez; Sara E Vargas; Connie Fei Lu; Melissa L Getz; Yaa Frimpong; Kelley A Smith; Claire Stout; Iris Tong; Melanie Hill; Robert E Berry; Abigail Harrison; Kate M Guthrie
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.706

4.  Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception.

Authors:  Natasha Mack; Tineke J Crawford; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Mario Chen; Thomas W Grey; Paul J Feldblum; Laurie L Stockton; Maria F Gallo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-23

Review 5.  Getting Intentional about Intention to Use: A Scoping Review of Person-Centered Measures of Demand.

Authors:  Victoria Boydell; Christine Galavotti
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2022-02-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.