Literature DB >> 30817920

Third Annual Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) Report: Preimplant Characteristics and Outcomes.

David L S Morales1, Joseph W Rossano2, Christina VanderPluym3, Angela Lorts4, Ryan Cantor5, James D St Louis6, Devin Koeh5, David L Sutcliffe7, Iki Adachi8, James K Kirklin5, David N Rosenthal9, Elizabeth D Blume3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of ventricular assist device (VAD) use in the care of children with end-stage heart failure is growing rapidly through increasing numbers, new devices, expanding indications, and improving outcomes. Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs), a National Institutes of Health-sponsored United States database, provides a platform to understand this emerging population.
METHODS: Between September 19, 2012, and December 31, 2017, 30 hospitals implanted 508 devices in 423 patients aged younger than 19 years. This past year was one of evolution for the database as its management was transitioned to The Society of Thoracic Surgery; therefore, this report does not include data from institutions not under contract by August 1, 2018.
RESULTS: Of the 423 patients, the diagnosis was cardiomyopathy in 261 (62%), myocarditis in 48 (11%), other in 28 (7%), and congenital heart disease (CHD) in 86 (20%), with 52 of these patients having single-ventricle physiology. The two most common support strategies included left VAD in 342 (81%) and biventricular assist device in 64 (15%). Positive outcome (alive on device or bridge to transplantation/recovery) was 80% at 6 months (overall mortality of 20%). The patient cohort for implantable continuous-flow (IC) pumps (n = 197; age at implant, 13.4 ± 3.8 years; 19% Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support [Intermacs] profile 1, 21% intubated at implant, and 12% with CHD) was significantly different from the paracorporeal continuous-flow (PC) pump cohort (n = 79; age, 3.9 ± 5.2 years; 49% Intermacs profile 1, 86% intubated at implant, and 38% with CHD) and the paracorporeal pulsatile (PP) pump cohort (n = 121; age, 3.3 ± 3.9 years; 41% Intermacs profile 1, 77% intubated at implant, and 21% with CHD). Consistent with their cohort composition, device type positive outcomes at 6 months were PC, 63%; PP, 77%; and IC, 92%. Parametric hazard modeling showed an early hazard for death was associated with Intermacs profile 1, biventricular assist device, percutaneous devices, PC devices, small-volume institutions, low age, and low weight, whereas a constant hazard was associated with intubation and liver dysfunction at time of implant.
CONCLUSIONS: IC VADs are the most common VAD type placed in children. The positive outcomes for the IC VADs exceed 90% at 6 months, which may represent our field's maturation in both patient selection and timing of implantation. The PP/PC devices are currently limited to supporting our most challenging patients, those weighing less than 20 kg and those with CHD. The introduction of new devices and our communities' commitment to shared learning and improvement will lead to more pediatric lives saved by VAD support and will also focus on improving the quality of life of children supported with VADs.
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30817920     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  15 in total

1.  Infant miniaturized continuous-flow pumps and permanent support in Pediatrics.

Authors:  Rachele Adorisio; Maria Grandinetti; Antonio Amodeo
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03

Review 2.  Collaboration and new data in ACTION: a learning health care system to improve pediatric heart failure and ventricular assist device outcomes.

Authors:  David M Peng; David N Rosenthal; Farhan Zafar; Lauren Smyth; Christina J VanderPluym; Angela Lorts
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-10

Review 3.  Mechanical circulatory support in children: past, present and future.

Authors:  Svetlana B Shugh; Kyle W Riggs; David L S Morales
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-10

Review 4.  Ethical and practical dilemmas in cardiac transplantation in infants: a literature review.

Authors:  Marieke Donné; Michel De Pauw; Kristof Vandekerckhove; Thierry Bové; Joseph Panzer
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Chest Compressions in Pediatric Patients With Continuous-Flow Ventricular Assist Devices: Case Series and Proposed Algorithm.

Authors:  Ivie D Esangbedo; Priscilla Yu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 6.  Pediatric ventricular assist device registries: update and perspectives in the era of miniaturized continuous-flow pumps.

Authors:  Kevin M Lichtenstein; Hari P Tunuguntla; David M Peng; Holger Buchholz; Jennifer Conway
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05

7.  Atretic Coronary Artery Ostia in a Full-Term Infant with Early Postnatal Demise.

Authors:  Nak Hyun Choi; Jenna Piccininni; Michael Pollaro; Sabrina Law; Sandhya Brachio; Allison Levey
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2020-04-29

8.  Short-term outcomes of EXCOR Paediatric implantation.

Authors:  Motoki Komori; Takaya Hoashi; Heima Sakaguchi; Kenta Imai; Naoki Okuda; Norihide Fukushima; Kenichi Kurosaki; Hajime Ichikawa
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-06-15

9.  Integrated long-term multifunctional pediatric mechanical circulatory assist device.

Authors:  Harutyun Sarkisyan; Randy Stevens; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili; Joseph Rossano; Amy Throckmorton
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.663

Review 10.  Patient and Device Selection in Pediatric MCS: A Review of Current Consensus and Unsettled Questions.

Authors:  Joshua M Friedland-Little; Anna Joong; Svetlana B Shugh; Matthew J O'Connor; Neha Bansal; Ryan R Davies; Michelle S Ploutz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 1.838

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.