Jan Gunst1, Astrid De Bruyn, Greet Van den Berghe. 1. Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Critically ill patients usually develop hyperglycemia, which is associated with adverse outcome. Controversy exists whether the relationship is causal or not. This review summarizes recent evidence regarding glucose control in the ICU. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite promising effects of tight glucose control in pioneer randomized controlled trials, the benefit has not been confirmed in subsequent multicenter studies and one trial found potential harm. This discrepancy could be explained by methodological differences between the trials rather than by a different case mix. Strategies to improve the efficacy and safety of tight glucose control have been developed, including the use of computerized treatment algorithms. SUMMARY: The ideal blood glucose target remains unclear and may depend on the context. As compared with tolerating severe hyperglycemia, tight glucose control is well tolerated and effective in patients receiving early parenteral nutrition when provided with a protocol that includes frequent, accurate glucose measurements and avoids large glucose fluctuations. All patient subgroups potentially benefit, with the possible exception of patients with poorly controlled diabetes, who may need less aggressive glucose control. It remains unclear whether tight glucose control is beneficial or not in the absence of early parenteral nutrition.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Critically ill patients usually develop hyperglycemia, which is associated with adverse outcome. Controversy exists whether the relationship is causal or not. This review summarizes recent evidence regarding glucose control in the ICU. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite promising effects of tight glucose control in pioneer randomized controlled trials, the benefit has not been confirmed in subsequent multicenter studies and one trial found potential harm. This discrepancy could be explained by methodological differences between the trials rather than by a different case mix. Strategies to improve the efficacy and safety of tight glucose control have been developed, including the use of computerized treatment algorithms. SUMMARY: The ideal blood glucose target remains unclear and may depend on the context. As compared with tolerating severe hyperglycemia, tight glucose control is well tolerated and effective in patients receiving early parenteral nutrition when provided with a protocol that includes frequent, accurate glucose measurements and avoids large glucose fluctuations. All patient subgroups potentially benefit, with the possible exception of patients with poorly controlled diabetes, who may need less aggressive glucose control. It remains unclear whether tight glucose control is beneficial or not in the absence of early parenteral nutrition.
Authors: Moritoki Egi; James S Krinsley; Paula Maurer; Devendra N Amin; Tomoyuki Kanazawa; Shruti Ghandi; Kiyoshi Morita; Michael Bailey; Rinaldo Bellomo Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Mark P Plummer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Caroline E Cousins; Christopher E Annink; Krishnaswamy Sundararajan; Benjamin A J Reddi; John P Raj; Marianne J Chapman; Michael Horowitz; Adam M Deane Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Frank M Brunkhorst; Christoph Engel; Frank Bloos; Andreas Meier-Hellmann; Max Ragaller; Norbert Weiler; Onnen Moerer; Matthias Gruendling; Michael Oppert; Stefan Grond; Derk Olthoff; Ulrich Jaschinski; Stefan John; Rolf Rossaint; Tobias Welte; Martin Schaefer; Peter Kern; Evelyn Kuhnt; Michael Kiehntopf; Christiane Hartog; Charles Natanson; Markus Loeffler; Konrad Reinhart Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-01-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Pierre Kalfon; Bruno Giraudeau; Carole Ichai; Alexandre Guerrini; Nicolas Brechot; Raphaël Cinotti; Pierre-François Dequin; Béatrice Riu-Poulenc; Philippe Montravers; Djilalli Annane; Hervé Dupont; Michel Sorine; Bruno Riou Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: J Geoffrey Chase; Thomas Desaive; Julien Bohe; Miriam Cnop; Christophe De Block; Jan Gunst; Roman Hovorka; Pierre Kalfon; James Krinsley; Eric Renard; Jean-Charles Preiser Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Johannes Roth; Oliver Sommerfeld; Andreas L Birkenfeld; Christoph Sponholz; Ulrich A Müller; Christian von Loeffelholz Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2021-09-17 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: David C Klonoff; Jordan C Messler; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Limin Peng; Robby Booth; Jennifer Crowe; Valerie Garrett; Raymie McFarland; Francisco J Pasquel Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Jan Gunst; Astrid De Bruyn; Michael P Casaer; Sarah Vander Perre; Lies Langouche; Greet Van den Berghe Journal: Crit Care Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 9.097