| Literature DB >> 30816854 |
Fionnuala Mone1,2, Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones1,2, Andrew K Ewer3,4, Mark D Kilby2,4.
Abstract
Major congenital anomalies are often associated with perinatal mortality, long-term morbidity and prolonged hospitalisation. Prenatal ultrasound remains the principle diagnostic test for many anomalies, but despite this up to one-third are only identified in the neonatal period. The primary step in determining underlying aetiology is to define accurately the phenotype by recognition of dysmorphology (both prenatally and postnatally). The potential introduction of next-generation sequencing, primarily through exome sequencing, into perinatal practice may improve the pathological diagnostic yield. However, clinicians must understand both the benefit and potential harms of this technology in facilitating the discovery of relevant pathogenic variants in the diagnosis and management of congenital malformations. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: PAGE study; exome sequencing; monogenic disorders; next generation sequencing; perinatal
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30816854 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ISSN: 1359-2998 Impact factor: 5.747