Literature DB >> 30815191

Evaluating the Impact of Uncertainty on Risk Prediction: Towards More Robust Prediction Models.

Panayiotis Petousis1, Arash Naeim2, Ali Mosleh3, William Hsu1.   

Abstract

Risk prediction models are crucial for assessing the pretest probability of cancer and are applied to stratify patient management strategies. These models are frequently based on multivariate regression analysis, requiring that all risk factors be specified, and do not convey the confidence in their predictions. We present a framework for uncertainty analysis that accounts for variability in input values. Uncertain or missing values are replaced with a range of plausible values. These ranges are used to compute individualized risk confidence intervals. We demonstrate our approach using the Gail model to evaluate the impact of uncertainty on management decisions. Up to 13% of cases (uncertain) had a risk interval that falls within the decision threshold (e.g., 1.67% 5-year absolute risk). A small number of cases changed from low- to high-risk when missing values were present. Our analysis underscores the need for better communication of input assumptions that influence the resulting predictions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30815191      PMCID: PMC6371325     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  17 in total

Review 1.  Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Judith Hibbard; Paul Slovic; Nathan Dieckmann
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Communication of uncertainty regarding individualized cancer risk estimates: effects and influential factors.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; William M P Klein; Tom Lehman; Bill Killam; Holly Massett; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Missing laboratory results data in electronic health databases: implications for monitoring diabetes risk.

Authors:  James H Flory; Jason Roy; Joshua J Gagne; Kevin Haynes; Lisa Herrinton; Christine Lu; Elisabetta Patorno; Azadeh Shoaibi; Marsha A Raebel
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  J P Costantino; M H Gail; D Pee; S Anderson; C K Redmond; J Benichou; H S Wieand
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Cancer risk prediction models: a workshop on development, evaluation, and application.

Authors:  Andrew N Freedman; Daniela Seminara; Mitchell H Gail; Patricia Hartge; Graham A Colditz; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Improving the radiologist-CAD interaction: designing for appropriate trust.

Authors:  W Jorritsma; F Cnossen; P M A van Ooijen
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Personalized estimates of breast cancer risk in clinical practice and public health.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Ian R White; John B Carlin; Michael Spratt; Patrick Royston; Michael G Kenward; Angela M Wood; James R Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-29

10.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan Tyrer; Stephen W Duffy; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: Translating risk into action.

Authors:  Anna C F Lewis; Robert C Green; Jason L Vassy
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2021-07-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.