Literature DB >> 30810787

Arthroscopic repair of HAGL lesions yields good clinical results, but may not allow return to former level of sport.

Uli Schmiddem1, Adam Watson2, Diana Perriman3, Emmanouil Liodakis4, Richard Page2,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of evidence regarding mid- to long-term clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair of humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL). This study investigated clinical outcomes, return to sport and the frequency of associated shoulder lesions.
METHODS: Eighteen patients underwent arthroscopic repair of a HAGL lesion between 2008 and 2015. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Rowe Score, the Quick DASH Score (Q-DASH), the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), the ASES Score and Range of Motion (ROM). Return to sports and associated shoulder lesions were documented.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients agreed to complete the shoulder scores and nine patients were available for clinical examination. Median time to follow-up was 59 months (range 16-104). The median Rowe Score and Q-DASH Score improved significantly from 33 to 85 points and 61 to 7 points, respectively (p = 0.001, p = 0.001). The median OSIS and ASES Score were 20 and 91 points. External rotation was significantly reduced compared to the contralateral side (p = 0.011). One recurrent dislocation was reported. No neurologic or vascular complications after surgery were reported. Five out of the nine patients did not return to sports at the same level. Associated shoulder lesions were found in 89% of the cases.
CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic repair of a HAGL lesion is a reliable method to restore shoulder stability with good clinical results. However, limitations in external rotation and a reduction in sporting ability may persist at 59 months follow-up. Concomitant lesions are common. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; Concomitant lesions; HAGL lesion; Instability; Outcome; Shoulder; Sports

Year:  2019        PMID: 30810787     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05414-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  6 in total

1.  Indications, management, and outcomes of humeral avulsions of the glenohumeral ligament: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chase Nelson; Charles Reiter; John Cyrus; James Satalich; Robert O'Connell; Alexander Vap
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-09-13

2.  Arthroscopic Repair of Humeral Avulsion of the Glenohumeral Ligaments Based on Location.

Authors:  Douglas Navasartian; Robert Hartzler; Thomas DeBerardino; Stephen Burkhart
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-07-17

Review 3.  Return-to-Sport Criteria After Upper Extremity Surgery in Athletes-A Scoping Review, Part 1: Rotator Cuff and Shoulder Stabilization Procedures.

Authors:  Rebecca Griffith; Nickolas Fretes; Ioanna K Bolia; Iain R Murray; John Meyer; Alexander E Weber; Seth C Gamradt; Frank A Petrigliano
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-06

4.  Arthroscopy Limits on Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Jair Simmer Filho; Raul Meyer Kautsky
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-10-25

5.  Evaluating the effects of arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet shoulder stabilisation procedures on shoulder joint neuromechanics and function: a single-centre, parallel-arm trial protocol.

Authors:  Aaron Fox; Jason Bonacci; Stephen D Gill; Richard S Page
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-02-23

6.  Arthroscopic Repair of Humeral Avulsion of Glenohumeral Ligament Lesions: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Alon Grundshtein; Efi Kazum; Ofir Chechik; Oleg Dolkart; Ehud Rath; Assaf Bivas; Eran Maman
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.