Literature DB >> 34776662

On-pump beating heart versus off-pump myocardial revascularization-a propensity-matched comparison.

Yashaskar Manjunatha Rao1, Shreyas Potdar1, Debasis Das1, Atanu Saha1, Lalit Kapoor1, Mrinalendu Das1, Pradeep Narayan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: On-pump beating heart (OP-BH) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is often undertaken as an alternative between off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (On-pump CABG), especially in India. However, outcome data following OP-BH surgery is sparse. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of OP-BH CABG with OPCAB.
METHODS: From our institutional database, all patients undergoing OP-BH CABG (n = 531) were identified. A propensity-matched cohort undergoing OPCAB (n = 531) was identified from the database. Nearest neighbor matching technique was used and the groups were matched for variables including age, gender, body mass index, EuroSCORE, history of recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive airway disease, diabetes, pre-op renal impairment, pre-op neurological events, and left ventricular function.
RESULTS: The propensity-matched groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics. The mean EuroSCORE was 3.17 and 3.20 in the OP-BH and the OPCAB groups. The unadjusted 30-day mortality in the propensity-matched OPCAB group was 2.07% (11/531) while mortality in the on-pump beating heart group was significantly higher at 6.9% (37/531). Multivariate analysis showed that OP-BH CABG was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality as well as major adverse post-operative outcomes including renal, neurological, and respiratory outcomes and post-operative atrial fibrillation.
CONCLUSIONS: OP-BH CABG is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to patients undergoing OPCAB. © Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CABG; OPCAB; On-pump beating heart

Year:  2021        PMID: 34776662      PMCID: PMC8545968          DOI: 10.1007/s12055-021-01209-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0970-9134


  35 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: current options and future challenges.

Authors:  Francesco Nicolini; Cesare Beghi; Claudio Muscari; Andrea Agostinelli; Alessandro Maria Budillon; Igino Spaggiari; Tiziano Gherli
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease.

Authors:  Michael J Mack; Albert Pfister; Donna Bachand; Robert Emery; Mitchell J Magee; Mark Connolly; Valavanur Subramanian
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass provides efficacious short- and long-term outcomes in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Tsai; Feng-Yen Lin; Ching-Huang Lai; Yi-Chang Lin; Chih-Yuan Lin; Chien-Sung Tsai
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 4.  Off-pump or on-pump beating heart: which technique offers better outcomes following coronary revascularization?

Authors:  Amir H Sepehripour; Umar A R Chaudhry; Leanne Harling; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-01-11

5.  Temporal onset, risk factors, and outcomes associated with stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Khaldoun G Tarakji; Joseph F Sabik; Sunil K Bhudia; Lillian H Batizy; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Myocardial revascularization using on-pump beating heart among patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Ahmad K Darwazah; Vivian Bader; Ismail Isleem; Khalil Helwa
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  On-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: early outcomes.

Authors:  Bilgehan Erkut; Ozgur Dag; Mehmet Ali Kaygin; Mutlu Senocak; Husnu Kamil Limandal; Umit Arslan; Adem Kiymaz; Ahmet Aydin; Nail Kahraman; Eyup Serhat Calik
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Myocardial injury in coronary artery bypass grafting: on-pump versus off-pump comparison by measuring high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, cardiac troponin I, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein, creatine kinase-MB, and myoglobin release.

Authors:  Ujjwal K Chowdhury; Vishwas Malik; Rakesh Yadav; Sandeep Seth; Lakshmy Ramakrishnan; Mani Kalaivani; Srikrishna M Reddy; Ganapathy K Subramaniam; Raghu Govindappa; Madhava Kakani
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Neutrophil chemoattractants generated in two phases during reperfusion of ischemic myocardium in the rabbit. Evidence for a role for C5a and interleukin-8.

Authors:  C L Ivey; F M Williams; P D Collins; P J Jose; T J Williams
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Early clinical outcomes of on-pump beating-heart versus off-pump technique for surgical revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: the experience of a single center.

Authors:  LiMin Xia; Qiang Ji; Kai Song; JinQiang Shen; YunQing Shi; RunHua Ma; WenJun Ding; ChunSheng Wang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.