Literature DB >> 30810164

Dose-dependent effects of mandibular advancement on upper airway collapsibility and muscle function in obstructive sleep apnea.

Ahmad A Bamagoos1,2,3,4, Peter A Cistulli1,2, Kate Sutherland1,2, Joachim Ngiam1, Peter G R Burke4,5, Lynne E Bilston4,5, Jane E Butler4,5, Danny J Eckert4,5.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Mandibular advancement splints (MAS) are the leading treatment alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, not all patients experience clinical benefit and treatment prediction remains challenging. Understanding the effects of mandibular advancement on pharyngeal collapsibility and muscle function may provide valuable information on the mechanisms of MAS, and thereby help to develop novel approaches for patient selection. Thus, we aimed to determine dose-dependent effects of mandibular advancement on pharyngeal collapsibility and muscle function concurrently in OSA patients undergoing MAS therapy.
METHODS: Twelve (11 male) MAS-naïve patients underwent a detailed physiology sleep study (polysomnography) to quantify pharyngeal collapsibility (PCRIT), pharyngeal muscle responsiveness to negative pharyngeal pressure (via genioglossus intramuscular electromyography and an epiglottic pressure sensor) and effectiveness to restore airflow and minute ventilation (Vi) after 1-minute transient CPAP reductions (induced airflow-limitation) at three mandibular advancement positions: 0% (habitual bite), 50% and 100% of the maximum comfortable mandibular advancement. Standard clinical polysomnography after MAS therapy optimization was performed to determine treatment outcome.
RESULTS: Overall, participants were obese with severe OSA (mean ± SD: BMI = 31 ± 4 kg/m2, apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] = 33 ± 14 events/hour). PCRIT decreased with mandibular advancement in a dose-dependent manner (1.8 ± 3.9 vs. -0.9 ± 2.9 vs. -4.0 ± 3.6 cmH2O; p < 0.001). There was no systematic change in genioglossus muscle responsiveness (p = 0.09) or effectiveness to restore peak airflow (p = 0.4) or Vi (p = 0.7) with mandibular advancement.
CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular advancement reduces pharyngeal collapsibility in a dose-dependent manner without systematically changing genioglossus muscle function in a predominantly obese and severe OSA population. This indicates that the primary mode of action of MAS therapy is via improvement in passive pharyngeal anatomy. © Sleep Research Society 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endotyping; mechanisms; oral appliance therapy; phenotyping; sleep-disordered breathing; upper airway physiology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30810164     DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsz049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  12 in total

1.  Efficacy of a novel oral appliance and the role of posture on nasal resistance in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Benjamin K Tong; Carolin Tran; Andrea Ricciardiello; Alan Chiang; Michelle Donegan; Nick Murray; Irene Szollosi; Jason Amatoury; Jayne C Carberry; Danny J Eckert
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Upper airway collapsibility in patients with OSA treated with continuous positive airway pressure: a retrospective preliminary study.

Authors:  Marcello Bosi; Serena Incerti Parenti; Andrea Fiordelli; Venerino Poletti; Giulio Alessandri-Bonetti
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Development of a physiological-based model that uses standard polysomnography and clinical data to predict oral appliance treatment outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Ritaban Dutta; Benjamin K Tong; Danny J Eckert
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Mandibular Advancement Splint Therapy.

Authors:  Anna M Mohammadieh; Kate Sutherland; Andrew S L Chan; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  The effect of gradually increased mandibular advancement on the efficacy of an oral appliance in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Yanyan Ma; Min Yu; Xuemei Gao
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Polysomnographic Endotyping to Select Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea for Oral Appliances.

Authors:  Ahmad A Bamagoos; Peter A Cistulli; Kate Sutherland; Melanie Madronio; Danny J Eckert; Lauren Hess; Bradley A Edwards; Andrew Wellman; Scott A Sands
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-11

Review 7.  Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: State of the Art.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  Mandibular Advancement Devices for OSA: An Alternative to CPAP?

Authors:  Claire E Francis; Tim Quinnell
Journal:  Pulm Ther       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 9.  Critical to Know Pcrit: A Review on Pharyngeal Critical Closing Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Elahe Kazemeini; Eli Van de Perck; Marijke Dieltjens; Marc Willemen; Johan Verbraecken; Sara Op de Beeck; Olivier M Vanderveken
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Critical closing pressure of the pharyngeal airway during routine drug-induced sleep endoscopy: feasibility and protocol.

Authors:  Elahe Kazemeini; Eli Van de Perck; Marijke Dieltjens; Marc Willemen; Johan Verbraecken; Scott A Sands; Olivier M Vanderveken; Sara Op de Beeck
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.