Benjamin K Tong1,2, Carolin Tran1, Andrea Ricciardiello1, Alan Chiang1, Michelle Donegan1, Nick Murray3, Irene Szollosi4, Jason Amatoury1,2,5, Jayne C Carberry1,2,6, Danny J Eckert1,2,6. 1. Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 4. The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 5. Biomedical Engineering Program, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 6. Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: High nasal resistance is associated with oral appliance treatment failure in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A novel oral appliance with a built-in oral airway has been shown to reduce pharyngeal pressure swings during sleep and may be efficacious in those with high nasal resistance. The role of posture and mandibular advancement on nasal resistance in OSA remains unclear. This study aimed to determine (1) the effects of posture and mandibular advancement on nasal resistance in OSA and (2) the efficacy of a new oral appliance device including in patients with high nasal resistance. METHODS: A total of 39 people with OSA (7 females, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (mean ± standard deviation) = 29 ± 21 events/h) completed split-night polysomnography with and without oral appliance (order randomized). Prior to sleep, participants were instrumented with a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, and a choanal pressure catheter for gold standard nasal resistance quantification seated, supine and lateral (with and without oral appliance, order randomized). RESULTS:Awake nasal resistance increased from seated, to supine, to lateral posture (median [interquartile range] = 1.8 [1.4, 2.7], 2.7 [1.7, 3.5], 3.4 [1.9, 4.6] cm H₂O/L/s, P < .001). Corresponding measures of nasal resistance did not change with mandibular advancement (2.3 [1.4, 3.5], 2.5 [1.8, 3.6], 3.5 [1.9, 4.8] cm H₂O/L/s, P = .388). The median AHI reduced by 47% with oral appliance therapy (29 ± 21 versus 18 ± 15 events/h, P = .002). Participants with high nasal resistance (> 3 cm H₂O/L/s) had similar reductions in AHI versus those with normal nasal resistance (61 [-8, 82] versus 40 [-5, 62] %, P = .244). CONCLUSIONS:Nasal resistance changes with posture in people with OSA. A novel oral appliance with a built-in oral airway reduces OSA severity in people with OSA, including in those with high nasal resistance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ANZCTR; Title: Combination therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea; Identifier: ACTRN12617000492358; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372279.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVES: High nasal resistance is associated with oral appliance treatment failure in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A novel oral appliance with a built-in oral airway has been shown to reduce pharyngeal pressure swings during sleep and may be efficacious in those with high nasal resistance. The role of posture and mandibular advancement on nasal resistance in OSA remains unclear. This study aimed to determine (1) the effects of posture and mandibular advancement on nasal resistance in OSA and (2) the efficacy of a new oral appliance device including in patients with high nasal resistance. METHODS: A total of 39 people with OSA (7 females, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (mean ± standard deviation) = 29 ± 21 events/h) completed split-night polysomnography with and without oral appliance (order randomized). Prior to sleep, participants were instrumented with a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, and a choanal pressure catheter for gold standard nasal resistance quantification seated, supine and lateral (with and without oral appliance, order randomized). RESULTS: Awake nasal resistance increased from seated, to supine, to lateral posture (median [interquartile range] = 1.8 [1.4, 2.7], 2.7 [1.7, 3.5], 3.4 [1.9, 4.6] cm H₂O/L/s, P < .001). Corresponding measures of nasal resistance did not change with mandibular advancement (2.3 [1.4, 3.5], 2.5 [1.8, 3.6], 3.5 [1.9, 4.8] cm H₂O/L/s, P = .388). The median AHI reduced by 47% with oral appliance therapy (29 ± 21 versus 18 ± 15 events/h, P = .002). Participants with high nasal resistance (> 3 cm H₂O/L/s) had similar reductions in AHI versus those with normal nasal resistance (61 [-8, 82] versus 40 [-5, 62] %, P = .244). CONCLUSIONS: Nasal resistance changes with posture in people with OSA. A novel oral appliance with a built-in oral airway reduces OSA severity in people with OSA, including in those with high nasal resistance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ANZCTR; Title: Combination therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea; Identifier: ACTRN12617000492358; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372279.
Authors: Marijke Dieltjens; Annelies E Verbruggen; Marc J Braem; Kristien Wouters; Johan A Verbraecken; Wilfried A De Backer; Evert Hamans; Paul H Van de Heyning; Olivier M Vanderveken Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Sushanth Bhat; Divya Gupta; Omar Akel; Peter G Polos; Vincent A DeBari; Shaista Akhtar; Anna McIntyre; Sue X Ming; Hinesh Upadhyay; Sudhansu Chokroverty Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Lourdes Lozano; José Luis Tovar; Gabriel Sampol; Odile Romero; María José Jurado; Alfons Segarra; Eugènia Espinel; José Ríos; María Dolores Untoria; Patrícia Lloberes Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: H Klar Yaggi; John Concato; Walter N Kernan; Judith H Lichtman; Lawrence M Brass; Vahid Mohsenin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kate Sutherland; Olivier M Vanderveken; Hiroko Tsuda; Marie Marklund; Frederic Gagnadoux; Clete A Kushida; Peter A Cistulli Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Atqiya Aishah; Richard Lim; Scott A Sands; Luigi Taranto-Montemurro; Andrew Wellman; Jayne C Carberry; Danny J Eckert Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2021-03-18