Literature DB >> 30809941

Variation in use of procurement biopsies and its implications for discard of deceased donor kidneys recovered for transplantation.

Krista L Lentine1, Abhijit S Naik2, Mark A Schnitzler1, Henry Randall1, Jason R Wellen3, Bertram L Kasiske4, Gary Marklin5, Diane Brockmeier5, Matthew Cooper6, Huiling Xiao1, Zidong Zhang1, Robert S Gaston7, Richard Rothweiler5, David A Axelrod8.   

Abstract

The use of procurement biopsies in deceased donor kidney acceptance is controversial. We analyzed Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (n = 59 328 allografts, 2014-2018) to describe biopsy practices across US organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and examine relationships with discards, using hierarchical modeling to account for OPO and donor factors. Median odds ratios (MORs) provide the median of the odds that allografts with identical reported traits would be biopsied or discarded from 2 randomly drawn OPOs. Biopsies were obtained for 52.7% of kidneys. Biopsy use rose in a graded manner with kidney donor profile index (KDPI). Biopsy rates differed significantly among OPOs (22.8% to 77.5%), even after adjustment for KDPI and other donor factors. Discard rates also varied from 6.6% to 32.1% across OPOs. After adjustment for donor factors and OPO, biopsy was associated with more than 3 times the likelihood of discard (adjusted odds ratio [95%LCL aOR95 %UCL ], 3.29 3.513.76 ). This association was most pronounced for low-risk (KDPI <20) kidneys (aOR, 5.45 6.477.69 ), with minimal impact at KDPI >85 (aOR, 0.88 1.151.51 ). Adjusted MORs for kidney discard and biopsy were greatest for low-risk kidneys. Reducing the rate of unnecessary biopsy and improving the accuracy of histologic assessments in higher KDPI organs may help reduce graft discard rates.
© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR); biopsy; clinical research/practice; donors and donation: deceased; health services and outcomes research; kidney transplantation/nephrology; organ procurement; organ procurement and allocation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30809941     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  13 in total

1.  Utility and safety of early allograft biopsy in adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Evaldo Favi; Ajith James; Carmelo Puliatti; Phil Whatling; Mariano Ferraresso; Chiara Rui; Roberto Cacciola
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.801

2.  Can Behavioral Research Improve Transplant Decision-Making? A Mock Offer Study on the Role of Kidney Procurement Biopsies.

Authors:  Darren Stewart; Brian Shepard; John Rosendale; Harrison McGehee; Isaac Hall; Gaurav Gupta; Kunam Reddy; Bertram Kasiske; Kenneth Andreoni; David Klassen
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-01-06

3.  Estimating Nephron Number from Biopsies: Impact on Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Darya Morozov; Neda Parvin; Mark Conaway; Gavin Oxley; Edwin J Baldelomar; Aleksandra Cwiek; Kim deRonde; Scott C Beeman; Jennifer R Charlton; Kevin M Bennett
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Deceased Donor Procurement Biopsy Practices, Interpretation, and Histology-Based Decision-Making: A Survey of US Kidney Transplant Centers.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Vidya A Fleetwood; Yasar Caliskan; Henry Randall; Jason R Wellen; Melissa Lichtenberger; Craig Dedert; Richard Rothweiler; Gary Marklin; Diane Brockmeier; Mark A Schnitzler; Syed A Husain; Sumit Mohan; Bertram L Kasiske; Matthew Cooper; Roslyn B Mannon; David A Axelrod
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  Assessment of the Utility of Kidney Histology as a Basis for Discarding Organs in the United States: A Comparison of International Transplant Practices and Outcomes.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Olivier Aubert; Maarten Naesens; Edmund Huang; Vishnu Potluri; Dirk Kuypers; Antoine Bouquegneau; Gillian Divard; Marc Raynaud; Yassine Bouatou; Ashley Vo; Denis Glotz; Christophe Legendre; Carmen Lefaucheur; Stanley Jordan; Jean-Philippe Empana; Xavier Jouven; Alexandre Loupy
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Variations in deceased donor kidney procurement biopsy practice patterns: A survey of U.S. organ procurement organizations.

Authors:  Brendan R Emmons; S Ali Husain; Kristen L King; Joel T Adler; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.456

7.  Procurement Biopsies in Kidney Transplantation: More Information May Not Lead to Better Decisions.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Bertram Kasiske; David A Axelrod
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 14.978

Review 8.  Assessment of Organ Quality in Kidney Transplantation by Molecular Analysis and Why It May Not Have Been Achieved, Yet.

Authors:  Seraina von Moos; Enver Akalin; Valeria Mas; Thomas F Mueller
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Degree of Glomerulosclerosis in Procurement Kidney Biopsies from Marginal Donor Kidneys and Their Implications in Predicting Graft Outcomes.

Authors:  Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Charat Thongprayoon; Pradeep K Vaitla; Api Chewcharat; Panupong Hansrivijit; Felicitas L Koller; Michael A Mao; Tarun Bathini; Sohail Abdul Salim; Sreelatha Katari; Lee S Cummings; Eddie Island; Jameson Forster; Napat Leeaphorn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Kidney Perfusion as an Organ Quality Assessment Tool-Are We Counting Our Chickens Before They Have Hatched?

Authors:  Julie De Beule; Ina Jochmans
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.