Literature DB >> 30806890

How I do it: transnasal retraction during transoral robotic oropharyngeal resection.

Michael Gouzos1, Neeraj Sethi1, Andrew Foreman1, Suren Krishnan1, J C Hodge2.   

Abstract

Collapse of the resection plane presents a frustrating problem during transoral robotic resection, in a situation already typified by limited vision and access for instruments. We present a quick and cost-effective retraction technique to effectively mitigate this issue and increase the ease and reliability of robotic oropharyngeal resection. This technique utilises a simple transnasal apparatus to create greater exposure of the resection plane. A Y-suction catheter is inserted into the oropharynx via the nasal cavity. A silk suture is then used to attach it to the oropharyngeal resection specimen. When pulled from the nasal cavity, this apparatus adds a non-intrusive, tremor-free fixation point that pulls the resected specimen along a unique cephalo-posterior vector. This significantly improves access and vision of the desired dissection plane. The entire process takes approximately 1-2 min per side to properly execute. It can be adapted for various pathologies and subsites of the oropharynx. This transnasal technique is a simple, minimally invasive, and inexpensive method for improving wound tension during transoral oropharyngeal resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oropharynx; Retraction; Transnasal; Transoral robotic surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 30806890     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00937-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  7 in total

Review 1.  Transoral robotic surgery of the oropharynx: Clinical and anatomic considerations.

Authors:  Eric J Moore; Jeff Janus; Jan Kasperbauer
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  Adoption of transoral robotic surgery compared with other surgical modalities for treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer R Cracchiolo; Benjamin R Roman; David I Kutler; William I Kuhel; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Potential applications of the da Vinci minimally invasive surgical robotic system in otolaryngology.

Authors:  Ian K McLeod; Eric A Mair; Patrick C Melder
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.697

4.  Robot-assisted pharyngeal and laryngeal microsurgery: results of robotic cadaver dissections.

Authors:  Neil G Hockstein; J Paul Nolan; Bert W O'Malley; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Tongue base exposure during TORS without the use of a mouth prop.

Authors:  Matthew C Miller
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-20

6.  Transoral robotic surgery of the tongue base in obstructive sleep Apnea-Hypopnea syndrome: anatomic considerations and clinical experience.

Authors:  Claudio Vicini; Iacopo Dallan; Pietro Canzi; Sabrina Frassineti; Andrea Nacci; Veronica Seccia; Erica Panicucci; Maria Grazia La Pietra; Filippo Montevecchi; Manfred Tschabitscher
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Gregory S Weinstein; Bert W O'Malley; Wendy Snyder; Eric Sherman; Harry Quon
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.