Literature DB >> 16220853

Potential applications of the da Vinci minimally invasive surgical robotic system in otolaryngology.

Ian K McLeod1, Eric A Mair, Patrick C Melder.   

Abstract

Anatomic constraints and instrumentation design characteristics have limited the exploitation of endoscopic surgery in otolaryngology. The move toward less invasive and less morbid procedures has paved the way for the development and application of robotic and computer-assisted systems in surgery. Surgical robotics allows for the use of new instrumentation in our field. We review the operative advantages, limitations, and possible surgical applications of the da Vinci Surgical System in otolaryngology. In the laboratory setting, we explored the setup and use of the da Vinci system in porcine and cadaveric head and neck airway models; the setup was configuredfor optimal airway surgery. Endoscopic cautery, manipulation, and suturing of supraglottic tissues were performed in both the porcine and cadaveric models. We found that the da Vinci system provided the advantages of the lower morbidity associated with endoscopic surgery, more freedom of movement, and three-dimensional open surgical viewing. We also observed that the system has several limitations to use in otolaryngology.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16220853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J        ISSN: 0145-5613            Impact factor:   1.697


  20 in total

1.  Transoral robotic surgery for head and neck carcinomas.

Authors:  Stéphane Hans; Cécile Badoual; Philippe Gorphe; Daniel Brasnu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The emergence of endoscopic head and neck surgery.

Authors:  Floyd Christopher Holsinger; Alexander D Sweeney; Kitti Jantharapattana; Ahmed Salem; Randal S Weber; Woong Youn Chung; Carol M Lewis; David G Grant
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  [Update on computer- and mechatronic-assisted head and neck surgery in Germany].

Authors:  K Bumm; P A Federspil; T Klenzner; O Majdani; J Raczkowsky; G Strauss; J Schipper
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Suspension laryngoscopy using a curved-frame trans-oral robotic system.

Authors:  Young-Sik Kwon; Kyung Tae; Byung-Ju Yi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Robotic surgery in ear nose and throat.

Authors:  Amit Parmar; David G Grant; Peter Loizou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  How I do it: transnasal retraction during transoral robotic oropharyngeal resection.

Authors:  Michael Gouzos; Neeraj Sethi; Andrew Foreman; Suren Krishnan; J C Hodge
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-02-26

7.  Lowering gastrointestinal leak rates: a comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Brad E Snyder; Todd Wilson; Terry Scarborough; Sherman Yu; Erik B Wilson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-09-02

8.  A robotic assistant for trans-oral surgery: the robotic endo-laryngeal flexible (Robo-ELF) scope.

Authors:  Kevin Olds; Alexander Hillel; Jonathan Kriss; Archana Nair; Hongho Kim; Elizabeth Cha; Martin Curry; Lee Akst; Rex Yung; Jeremy Richmon; Russell Taylor
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-12-27

9.  Nasopharynx access by minimally invasive transoral robotic surgery: anatomical study.

Authors:  Amine Harichane; Dorian Chauvet; Stéphane Hans
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-03-16

10.  The HD-Panoramic Visualization System: a new visualization system for ENT surgery.

Authors:  G Strauss; N Bahrami; M Hofer; E Dittrich; M Strauss; A Dietz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.