Literature DB >> 30806756

Malpositioning of patient-specific instruments within the possible degrees of freedom in high-tibial osteotomy has no considerable influence on mechanical leg axis correction.

Lukas Jud1, Philipp Fürnstahl2, Lazaros Vlachopoulos3, Tobias Götschi3,4, Laura Catherine Leoty2, Sandro F Fucentese3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) are helpful tools in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in patients with symptomatic varus malalignment of the mechanical leg axis. However, the precision of HTO can decrease with malpositioned PSI. This study investigates the influence of malpositioned PSI on axis correction, osteotomy, and implant placement.
METHODS: With a mean three-dimensional (3D) model (0.8° varus), PSI-navigated HTOs were computer simulated. Two different guide designs, one with stabilising hooks and one without, were used. By adding rotational and translational offsets of different degrees, wrong placements of PSI were simulated. After 5° valgisation of the postoperative mechanical axis, the distance between joint-plane and osteotomy screws, respectively, were measured. The same simulations were performed in a patient with varus deformity (7.4° varus).
RESULTS: In the mean 3D model, the postoperative mechanical axis was within 3.9°-4.5° valgus with mean value of 4.1° ± 0.1° (correct axis 4.2° valgus). Surgical failure concerning osteotomy occurred in 17 of 76 HTOs. Significantly safer screw placement was observed using PSI with stabilising hooks (p = 0.012). In the case of the 3D model with 7.4° varus deformity, the postoperative mechanical axis was within 3.2°-3.9° valgus with mean value of 3.8° ± 0.2° (correct axis 3.9° valgus). Surgical failure concerning osteotomy occurred in 3 of 38 HTOs. Screws were always within the safety distance.
CONCLUSION: The clinical relevance of the presented study is that malpositioning of a PSI within the possible degrees of freedom does not have a relevant influence on the axis correction. The most vulnerable plane for surgical failure is the sagittal plane, wherefore the treating surgeon should verify correct guide placement to prevent surgical failure, particularly in this plane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axis correction; High tibial osteotomy; Patient-specific guides; Patient-specific instruments

Year:  2019        PMID: 30806756     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05432-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  15 in total

1.  The effects of different hinge positions on posterior tibial slope in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Ho-Seung Jo; Jin-Sung Park; June-Ho Byun; Young-Bok Lee; Young-Lac Choi; Seong-Hee Cho; Dong-Kyu Moon; Sang-Hyuk Lee; Sun-Chul Hwang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  3D Surgical Printing Cutting Guides for Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: Do It Yourself.

Authors:  Rubén Pérez-Mañanes; Juan Arnal Burró; Jose Rojo Manaute; Francisco Chana Rodriguez; Javier Vaquero Martín
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints.

Authors:  Y Fujisawa; K Masuhara; S Shiomi
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Can three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides be used to achieve optimal correction for high tibial osteotomy? Pilot study.

Authors:  M Munier; M Donnez; M Ollivier; X Flecher; P Chabrand; J-N Argenson; S Parratte
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.256

5.  Changes in posterior tibial slope angle in patients undergoing open-wedge high tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis.

Authors:  Omer Ozel; Bulent Yucel; Serhat Mutlu; Osman Orman; Harun Mutlu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Three-dimensional corrective osteotomies of complex malunited humeral fractures using patient-specific guides.

Authors:  Lazaros Vlachopoulos; Andreas Schweizer; Dominik C Meyer; Christian Gerber; Philipp Fürnstahl
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study.

Authors:  P Hernigou; D Medevielle; J Debeyre; D Goutallier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Patellar height and posterior tibial slope after open- and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a radiological study on 100 patients.

Authors:  Hosam El-Azab; Parpakorn Glabgly; Jochen Paul; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Hinterwimmer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Navigation versus conventional high tibial osteotomy: systematic review.

Authors:  Khaled Hasan; Qusai Abdel Rahman; Paul Zalzal
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-06-17

10.  Clinical Experience Using a 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Instrument for Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

Authors:  Jesse Chieh-Szu Yang; Cheng-Fong Chen; Chu-An Luo; Ming-Chau Chang; Oscar K Lee; Ye Huang; Shang-Chih Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  5 in total

1.  3D osteotomies-improved accuracy with patient-specific instruments (PSI).

Authors:  Maximilian Jörgens; Alexander M Keppler; Philipp Ahrens; Wolf Christian Prall; Marcel Bergstraesser; Andreas T Bachmeier; Christian Zeckey; Adrian Cavalcanti Kußmaul; Wolfgang Böcker; Julian Fürmetz
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  The impact of limb loading and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on the measurement of the limb loading dependent lower extremity parameters.

Authors:  Lukas Jud; Tabitha Roth; Philipp Fürnstahl; Lazaros Vlachopoulos; Reto Sutter; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  A novel 3D-printed patient-specific instrument based on "H-point" for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Guo-Bin Liu; Sen Liu; Chao-Hua Zhu; Jia Li; Jun Li; Guo-Xing Jia; Wei Dong; Feng Zhao; Ye Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Correction of complex three-dimensional deformities at the proximal femur using indirect reduction with angle blade plate and patient-specific instruments: a technical note.

Authors:  Lukas Jud; Lazaros Vlachopoulos; Karl Grob
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Computer-assisted femoral head reduction osteotomies: an approach for anatomic reconstruction of severely deformed Legg-Calvé-Perthes hips. A pilot study of six patients.

Authors:  P Fürnstahl; F A Casari; J Ackermann; M Marcon; M Leunig; R Ganz
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.