A cost-utility analysis of the home parenteral nutrition program at Toronto General Hospital: 1970-1982.

We performed an economic evaluation of a home parenteral nutrition (HPN) program by measuring the incremental costs and health outcomes for a cohort of 73 patients treated at our institution from November 1970 to July 1982. Over a 12-year time frame, we estimate that HPN resulted in a net savings in health care cost of $19,232 per patient and an increase in survival, adjusted for quality of life, of 3.3 years, compared with the alternative of treating these patients in hospital with intermittent nutritional support when needed. This result was sensitive to assumptions made about the cost of the alternative treatment strategy. When these assumptions were most unfavorable to the HPN program, we estimated that HPN resulted in incremental costs of $48,180 over 12 years, $14,600 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. We conclude that the cost-utility of HPN compares favorably with other health care programs, when HPN is used to treat patients with gut failure secondary to conditions such as Crohn's disease or acute volvulus. Since only one patient with active malignancy was enrolled in our HPN program, these results should not be extrapolated to patients with active malignancy.