Heejung Kim1, Ryan Spaulding2, Marilyn Werkowitch3, Donna Yadrich3, Ubolrat Piamjariyakul3, Richard Gilroy2, Carol E Smith4. 1. University of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City, Kansas hkim2@kumc.edu. 2. University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas. 3. University of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City, Kansas. 4. University of Kansas School of Nursing and Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Kansas City, Kansas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Determining the costs of healthcare delivery is a key step for providing efficient nutrition-based care. This analysis tabulates the costs of delivering home parenteral nutrition (HPN) interventions and clinical assessments through encrypted mobile technologies to increase patients' access to healthcare providers, reduce their travel expenses, and allow early detection of infection and other complications. METHODS: A traditional cost-accounting method was used to tabulate all expenses related to mobile distance HPN clinic appointments, including (1) personnel time of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, (2) supply of HPN intervention materials, and (3) equipment, connection, and delivery expenses. RESULTS: A total of 20 mobile distance clinic appointments were conducted for an average of 56 minutes each with 45 patients who required HPN infusion care. The initial setup costs included mobile tablet devices, 4G data plans, and personnel's time as well as intervention materials. The initial costs were on average $916.64 per patient, while the follow-up clinic appointments required $361.63 a month, with these costs continuing to decline as the equipment was used by multiple patients more frequently over time. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with cost savings in travel expenses and rated the quality of care comparable to traditional in-person examinations. CONCLUSION: This study provides important aspects of the initial cost tabulation for visual assessment for HPN appointments. These findings will be used to generate a decision algorithm for scheduling mobile distance clinic appointments intermittent with in-person visits to determine how to lower costs of nutrition assessments. To maximize the cost benefits, clinical trials must continue to collect clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Determining the costs of healthcare delivery is a key step for providing efficient nutrition-based care. This analysis tabulates the costs of delivering home parenteral nutrition (HPN) interventions and clinical assessments through encrypted mobile technologies to increase patients' access to healthcare providers, reduce their travel expenses, and allow early detection of infection and other complications. METHODS: A traditional cost-accounting method was used to tabulate all expenses related to mobile distance HPN clinic appointments, including (1) personnel time of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, (2) supply of HPN intervention materials, and (3) equipment, connection, and delivery expenses. RESULTS: A total of 20 mobile distance clinic appointments were conducted for an average of 56 minutes each with 45 patients who required HPN infusion care. The initial setup costs included mobile tablet devices, 4G data plans, and personnel's time as well as intervention materials. The initial costs were on average $916.64 per patient, while the follow-up clinic appointments required $361.63 a month, with these costs continuing to decline as the equipment was used by multiple patients more frequently over time. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with cost savings in travel expenses and rated the quality of care comparable to traditional in-person examinations. CONCLUSION: This study provides important aspects of the initial cost tabulation for visual assessment for HPN appointments. These findings will be used to generate a decision algorithm for scheduling mobile distance clinic appointments intermittent with in-person visits to determine how to lower costs of nutrition assessments. To maximize the cost benefits, clinical trials must continue to collect clinical outcomes.
Authors: A S Detsky; J R McLaughlin; H B Abrams; J S Whittaker; J Whitwell; K L'Abbé; K N Jeejeebhoy Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 1986 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Sharon A Fitzgerald; Donna Macan Yadrich; Marilyn Werkowitch; Ubolrat Piamjariyakul; Carol E Smith Journal: Comput Inform Nurs Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Carol E Smith; Ubolrat Piamjariyakul; Marilyn Werkowitch; Donna Macan Yadrich; Noreen Thompson; Dedrick Hooper; Eve-Lynn Nelson Journal: Int J Sens Netw Data Commun Date: 2016-03-15
Authors: Shawna Wright; Noreen Thompson; Donna Yadrich; Amanda Bruce; Jaime R M Bonar; Ryan Spaulding; Carol E Smith Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Clemens Scott Kruse; Nicole Krowski; Blanca Rodriguez; Lan Tran; Jackeline Vela; Matthew Brooks Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 2.692