BACKGROUND: The residency match process for competitive specialties hinders programs' ability to holistically review applications. OBJECTIVE: A computer simulation model of the residency application process was created to test the hypotheses that (1) it is advantageous to medical students to apply to the maximum number of programs under the current system, and (2) including a medical student's residency program preferences at the beginning of the application process improves the efficiency of the system for applicants and programs as quantified by the number of interview invitations received. METHODS: The study was conducted in 2016 using 2014 Otolaryngology Match data. A computer model was created to perform simulations for multiple scenarios to test the hypotheses. Students were assigned scores representing easy and hard metrics and program preferences, simulating a mixture of individual student preference and general program popularity. RESULTS: We modeled a system of 99 otolaryngology residency programs with 292 residency spots and 460 student applicants. While it was individually advantageous for an applicant to apply to the maximum number of programs, this led to a poor result for the majority of students when all applicants undertook the strategy. The number of interview invitations improved for most applicants when preference was revealed. CONCLUSIONS: Offering applicants an option to provide program preference improves the practical number of interview invitations. This enables programs to review applicants holistically-instead of using single parameters such as United States Medical Licensing Examination scores-which facilitates a selection of applicants who will be successful in residency.
BACKGROUND: The residency match process for competitive specialties hinders programs' ability to holistically review applications. OBJECTIVE: A computer simulation model of the residency application process was created to test the hypotheses that (1) it is advantageous to medical students to apply to the maximum number of programs under the current system, and (2) including a medical student's residency program preferences at the beginning of the application process improves the efficiency of the system for applicants and programs as quantified by the number of interview invitations received. METHODS: The study was conducted in 2016 using 2014 Otolaryngology Match data. A computer model was created to perform simulations for multiple scenarios to test the hypotheses. Students were assigned scores representing easy and hard metrics and program preferences, simulating a mixture of individual student preference and general program popularity. RESULTS: We modeled a system of 99 otolaryngology residency programs with 292 residency spots and 460 student applicants. While it was individually advantageous for an applicant to apply to the maximum number of programs, this led to a poor result for the majority of students when all applicants undertook the strategy. The number of interview invitations improved for most applicants when preference was revealed. CONCLUSIONS: Offering applicants an option to provide program preference improves the practical number of interview invitations. This enables programs to review applicants holistically-instead of using single parameters such as United States Medical Licensing Examination scores-which facilitates a selection of applicants who will be successful in residency.
Authors: Adam D Bernstein; Laith M Jazrawi; Basil Elbeshbeshy; Craig J Della Valle; Joseph D Zuckerman Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Grant M Gebhard; Leah J Hauser; Miranda J Dally; David A Weitzenkamp; Cristina Cabrera-Muffly Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Robert D Huang; Lucienne Lutfy-Clayton; Douglas Franzen; Alexis Pelletier-Bui; David C Gordon; Zachary Jarou; Jim Cranford; Laura R Hopson Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-12-10
Authors: Laura R Hopson; Mary A Edens; Margaret Goodrich; Michael Kiemeney; Elizabeth B Werley; Adam Kellogg; Douglas Franzen Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-12-14
Authors: Michael Dacre; Laura R Hopson; Jeremy Branzetti; Linda Regan; Stefanie S Sebok-Syer; Michael A Gisondi Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2021-07-01
Authors: Alexis Pelletier-Bui; Doug Franzen; Liza Smith; Laura Hopson; Lucienne Lutfy-Clayton; Kendra Parekh; Mark Olaf; Tom Morrissey; David Gordon; Erin McDonough; Benjamin H Schnapp; Mary Ann Edens; Michael Kiemeney Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-08-19
Authors: Alexis E Pelletier-Bui; Benjamin H Schnapp; Liza G Smith; Doug Franzen; Elizabeth Barrall Werley; Erin McDonough; Melanie Camejo Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2021-12-17