Moritz Zaiss1, Anagha Deshmane1, Mark Schuppert1, Kai Herz1, Felix Glang1, Philipp Ehses2, Tobias Lindig1,3, Benjamin Bender3, Ulrike Ernemann3, Klaus Scheffler1,4. 1. High-field Magnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany. 2. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Eberhard-Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 4. Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Eberhard-Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of employing the prior knowledge of well-separated chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) signals in the 9.4 T Z-spectrum to separate overlapping CEST signals acquired at 3 T, using a deep learning approach trained with 3 T and 9.4 T CEST spectral data from brains of the same subjects. METHODS: Highly spectrally resolved Z-spectra from the same volunteer were acquired by 3D-snapshot CEST MRI at 3 T and 9.4 T at low saturation power of B1 = 0.6 µT. The volume-registered 3 T Z-spectra-stack was then used as input data for a three layer deep neural network with the volume-registered 9.4 T fitted parameter stack as target data. RESULTS: An optimized neural net architecture could be found and verified in healthy volunteers. The gray-/white-matter contrast of the different CEST effects was predicted with only small deviations (Pearson R = 0.89). The 9.4 T prediction was less noisy compared to the directly measured CEST maps, although at the cost of slightly lower tissue contrast. Application to an unseen tumor patient measured at 3 T and 9.4 T revealed that tumorous tissue Z-spectra and corresponding hyper-/hypointensities of different CEST effects can also be predicted (Pearson R = 0.84). CONCLUSION: The 9.4 T CEST signals acquired at low saturation power can be accurately estimated from CEST imaging at 3 T using a neural network trained with coregistered 3 T and 9.4 T data of healthy subjects. The deepCEST approach generalizes to Z-spectra of tumor areas and might indicate whether additional ultrahigh-field (UHF) scans will be beneficial.
PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of employing the prior knowledge of well-separated chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) signals in the 9.4 T Z-spectrum to separate overlapping CEST signals acquired at 3 T, using a deep learning approach trained with 3 T and 9.4 T CEST spectral data from brains of the same subjects. METHODS: Highly spectrally resolved Z-spectra from the same volunteer were acquired by 3D-snapshot CEST MRI at 3 T and 9.4 T at low saturation power of B1 = 0.6 µT. The volume-registered 3 T Z-spectra-stack was then used as input data for a three layer deep neural network with the volume-registered 9.4 T fitted parameter stack as target data. RESULTS: An optimized neural net architecture could be found and verified in healthy volunteers. The gray-/white-matter contrast of the different CEST effects was predicted with only small deviations (Pearson R = 0.89). The 9.4 T prediction was less noisy compared to the directly measured CEST maps, although at the cost of slightly lower tissue contrast. Application to an unseen tumorpatient measured at 3 T and 9.4 T revealed that tumorous tissue Z-spectra and corresponding hyper-/hypointensities of different CEST effects can also be predicted (Pearson R = 0.84). CONCLUSION: The 9.4 T CEST signals acquired at low saturation power can be accurately estimated from CEST imaging at 3 T using a neural network trained with coregistered 3 T and 9.4 T data of healthy subjects. The deepCEST approach generalizes to Z-spectra of tumor areas and might indicate whether additional ultrahigh-field (UHF) scans will be beneficial.
Authors: Yiran Li; Danfeng Xie; Abigail Cember; Ravi Prakash Reddy Nanga; Hanlu Yang; Dushyant Kumar; Hari Hariharan; Li Bai; John A Detre; Ravinder Reddy; Ze Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Chongxue Bie; Yuguo Li; Yang Zhou; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Xiaolei Song; Guanshu Liu; Peter C M van Zijl; Nirbhay N Yadav Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Peter C M van Zijl; Kevin Brindle; Hanzhang Lu; Peter B Barker; Richard Edden; Nirbhay Yadav; Linda Knutsson Journal: Curr Opin Chem Biol Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 8.972
Authors: Kai Herz; Sebastian Mueller; Or Perlman; Maxim Zaitsev; Linda Knutsson; Phillip Zhe Sun; Jinyuan Zhou; Peter van Zijl; Kerstin Heinecke; Patrick Schuenke; Christian T Farrar; Manuel Schmidt; Arnd Dörfler; Klaus Scheffler; Moritz Zaiss Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Karl Ludger Radke; Lena Marie Wilms; Miriam Frenken; Julia Stabinska; Marek Knet; Benedikt Kamp; Thomas Andreas Thiel; Timm Joachim Filler; Sven Nebelung; Gerald Antoch; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Anja Müller-Lutz Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 6.208