Literature DB >> 30802608

Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy with Enclosed Colpotomy and without the Use of Uterine Manipulator for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Peng Yuan1, Zhaoyang Liu2, Jin Qi2, Xiaohua Yang2, Tong Hu2, Hongwei Tan2.   

Abstract

It was reported recently that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with worse prognosis than the open abdominal counterpart for the management of early-stage cervical cancer. Uterine manipulator and intracorporeal open colpotomy may be the 2 main suspects responsible for the inferiority. We hypothesize that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with enclosed colpotomy and without the use of a uterine manipulator will improve survival. Thus, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with abdominal uterine manipulation and enclosed colpotomy was performed in women with early-stage cervical cancer. The round ligament, the ovary ligament, and the fallopian tube were sutured together for the abdominal manipulation of the uterus. Meanwhile, the upper vagina was ligated before colpotomy to avoid tumor spillage. There were no intraoperative and postoperative complications. The abdominal uterine manipulation and enclosed colpotomy technique, which are both safe and feasible in this study, provide a relatively tumor-free approach for minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. Further investigation of oncologic outcomes in larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our hypothesis.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal uterine manipulation; Early-stage cervical cancer; Enclosed colpotomy; Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy; Uterine manipulator

Year:  2019        PMID: 30802608     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  10 in total

Review 1.  Radical Hysterectomy After the LACC Trial: Back to Radical Vaginal Surgery.

Authors:  Denis Querleu; Delphine Hudry; Fabrice Narducci; Agnieszka Rychlik
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-02-23

2.  A Comparison of Laparoscopies and Laparotomies for Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Single Team With 18 Years of Experience.

Authors:  Meng Qin; Li Siyi; Hui-Fang Huang; Yan Li; Yu Gu; Wei Wang; Ying Shan; Jie Yin; Yong-Xue Wang; Yan Cai; Jia-Yu Chen; Ying Jin; Ling-Ya Pan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Is it time to call for improvement in surgical techniques for minimally invasive radical hysterectomy?

Authors:  Linus Chuang; Pratistha Koirala; Farr Nezhat
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Laparoscopic Regional Radical Hysterectomy Showed Promising Clinical Outcomes in Early-stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Weihong Yang; Rong Chen; Caixia Li; Li Li; Ning Luo; Zhongping Cheng
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2020-10-15

5.  Vaginal Closure Before Colpotomy with an Endo-Stapler to Prevent Tumor Spillage in Laparoscopic Surgery for Gynecological Malignancy.

Authors:  Dipak Limbachiya; Rashmi Kumari
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Potential prognostic factors in progression-free survival for patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hui-Hui Chen; Wei-Yu Meng; Run-Ze Li; Qing-Yi Wang; Yu-Wei Wang; Hu-Dan Pan; Pei-Yu Yan; Qi-Biao Wu; Liang Liu; Xiao-Jun Yao; Min Kang; Elaine Lai-Han Leung
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with enclosed colpotomy without the use of uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Bo Ding; Xiaoming Guan; Kristina Duan; Yang Shen
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  The Surgeon's Proficiency Affected Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 851 Patients.

Authors:  Ying Yang; Yue Huang; Zhengyu Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Cervical Cancer Surgery: Current State of Affairs.

Authors:  Fan Chun Yang; Wei Huang; Weihong Yang; Jie Liu; Guihai Ai; Ning Luo; Jing Guo; Peng Teng Chua; Zhongping Cheng
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2021-04-30

10.  Retrospective Analysis of Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcomes: Ten Years of Experience with the Vaginal Assisted Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy VARLH.

Authors:  R Wojdat; E Malanowska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.