Literature DB >> 35195838

Radical Hysterectomy After the LACC Trial: Back to Radical Vaginal Surgery.

Denis Querleu1,2, Delphine Hudry3, Fabrice Narducci3, Agnieszka Rychlik4.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Classical radical vaginal hysterectomy first performed by Anton Pawlik in Prague in 1888 and popularized by Frederic Schauta is now a historical technique virtually abandoned due to painful perineal incision, a high rate of urinary dysfunction, and the inability to perform lymph node assessment. However, the heritage of this approach has been still used and taught in a few centers outside their Austrian birthplace. A combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach was developed in the 1990s by French and German surgeons who designed diverse surgical techniques for which a novel classification is proposed. All these techniques are different from the so-called laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH), a term widely used for laparoscopic radical hysterectomies with vaginal extraction of the specimen. Interestingly, after the publication of the LACC trial (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer), the radical vaginal approach has found a very timely application. The creation of a vaginal cuff before performing radical laparoscopic hysterectomy described in 2007 by Leblanc as "Schautheim" operation can be used as a protective maneuver to avoid tumor spillage and potentially overturn the negative outcome of minimally invasive surgery in early-stage cervical cancer. As a result, the combination of radical vaginal and laparoscopic steps of surgery is one possible evolution after the LACC trial that needs further investigation. The forgotten vaginal surgical technique needs a specific learning curve. The creation of a vaginal cuff should be mastered by every gynecological oncologist.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early cervical cancer; Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Radical vaginal hysterectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35195838     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-00937-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  49 in total

Review 1.  Classification of radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Denis Querleu; C Paul Morrow
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissections; a report of 100 patients operated on five or more years ago.

Authors:  J V MEIGS
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1951-10       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy Has Many Benefits Compared with Open Radical Hysterectomy: Will the LACC Trial Cause the Premature Demise of This Procedure?

Authors:  R Wendel Naumann
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Henrik Falconer; Kolbrun Palsdottir; Karin Stalberg; Pernilla Dahm-Kähler; Ulrika Ottander; Evelyn Serreyn Lundin; Lena Wijk; Rainer Kimmig; Pernille Tine Jensen; Ane Gerda Zahl Eriksson; Johanna Mäenpää; Jan Persson; Sahar Salehi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) statement.

Authors:  Denis Querleu; David Cibula; Nicole Concin; Anna Fagotti; Annamaria Ferrero; Christina Fotopoulou; Pawel Knapp; Dina Kurdiani; Jonathan A Ledermann; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Philppe Morice; Jordi Ponce; Elzbieta Van der Steen-Banasik; Cagatay Taskiran; Pauline Wimberger; Kamil Zalewski; Cristiana Sessa
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Wertheim-Meigs or Schauta-Amreich hysterectomy.

Authors:  G N Than
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Three classes of radical vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer.

Authors:  G Massi; L Savino; T Susini
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz; Rene Pareja; Aldo Lopez; Marcelo Vieira; Reitan Ribeiro; Alessandro Buda; Xiaojian Yan; Yao Shuzhong; Naven Chetty; David Isla; Mariano Tamura; Tao Zhu; Kristy P Robledo; Val Gebski; Rebecca Asher; Vanessa Behan; James L Nicklin; Robert L Coleman; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Luis Chiva; Vanna Zanagnolo; Denis Querleu; Nerea Martin-Calvo; Juan Arévalo-Serrano; Mihai Emil Căpîlna; Anna Fagotti; Ali Kucukmetin; Constantijne Mom; Galina Chakalova; Shamistan Aliyev; Mario Malzoni; Fabrice Narducci; Octavio Arencibia; Francesco Raspagliesi; Tayfun Toptas; David Cibula; Dilyara Kaidarova; Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli; Mariana Tavares; Dmytro Golub; Anna Myriam Perrone; Robert Poka; Dimitrios Tsolakidis; Goran Vujić; Marcin A Jedryka; Petra L M Zusterzeel; Jogchum Jan Beltman; Frederic Goffin; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Herman Haller; Robert Jach; Iryna Yezhova; Igor Berlev; Margarida Bernardino; Rasiah Bharathan; Maximilian Lanner; Minna M Maenpaa; Vladyslav Sukhin; Jean-Guillaume Feron; Robert Fruscio; Kersti Kukk; Jordi Ponce; Jose Angel Minguez; Daniel Vázquez-Vicente; Teresa Castellanos; Enrique Chacon; Juan Luis Alcazar
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Wui-Jin Koh; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Sarah Bean; Kristin Bradley; Susana M Campos; Kathleen R Cho; Hye Sook Chon; Christina Chu; Rachel Clark; David Cohn; Marta Ann Crispens; Shari Damast; Oliver Dorigo; Patricia J Eifel; Christine M Fisher; Peter Frederick; David K Gaffney; Ernest Han; Warner K Huh; John R Lurain; Andrea Mariani; David Mutch; Christa Nagel; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Amanda Nickles Fader; Steven W Remmenga; R Kevin Reynolds; Todd Tillmanns; Stefanie Ueda; Emily Wyse; Catheryn M Yashar; Nicole R McMillian; Jillian L Scavone
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 12.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.