Literature DB >> 30802304

Randomized clinical trial of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in elective colorectal cancer surgery (SELECT trial).

G S A Abis1, H B A C Stockmann2, H J Bonjer1, N van Veenendaal1, M L M van Doorn-Schepens3, A E Budding3, J A Wilschut4, M van Egmond1, S J Oosterling2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infectious complications and anastomotic leakage affect approximately 30 per cent of patients after colorectal cancer surgery. The aim of this multicentre randomized trial was to investigate whether selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) reduces these complications of elective colorectal cancer surgery.
METHODS: The effectiveness of SDD was evaluated in a multicentre, open-label RCT in six centres in the Netherlands. Patients with colorectal cancer scheduled for elective curative surgery with a primary anastomosis were eligible. Oral colistin, tobramycin and amphotericin B were administered to patients in the SDD group to decontaminate the digestive tract. Both treatment and control group received intravenous cefazolin and metronidazole for perioperative prophylaxis. Mechanical bowel preparation was given for left-sided colectomies, sigmoid and anterior resections. Anastomotic leakage was the primary outcome; infectious complications and mortality were secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: The outcomes for 228 patients randomized to the SDD group and 227 randomized to the control group were analysed. The trial was stopped after interim analysis demonstrated that superiority was no longer attainable. Effective SDD was confirmed by interspace DNA profiling analysis of rectal swabs. Anastomotic leakage was observed in 14 patients (6·1 per cent) in the SDD group and in 22 patients (9·7 per cent) in the control group (odds ratio (OR) 0·61, 95 per cent c.i. 0·30 to 1·22). Fewer patients in the SDD group had one or more infectious complications than patients in the control group (14·9 versus 26·9 per cent respectively; OR 0·48, 0·30 to 0·76). Multivariable analysis indicated that SDD reduced the rate of infectious complications (OR 0·47, 0·29 to 0·76).
CONCLUSION: SDD reduces infectious complications after colorectal cancer resection but did not significantly reduce anastomotic leakage in this trial. Registration number: NCT01740947 ( https://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
© 2019 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30802304     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  25 in total

Review 1.  Re-examining causes of surgical site infections following elective surgery in the era of asepsis.

Authors:  John C Alverdy; Neil Hyman; Jack Gilbert
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 25.071

2.  Prevention of anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery with local antibiotic decontamination: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single center trial.

Authors:  H M Schardey; Ulrich Wirth; T Strauss; M S Kasparek; D Schneider; K W Jauch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  [Oral antibiotic prophylaxis for bowel decontamination before elective colorectal surgery : Current body of evidence and recommendations].

Authors:  S Flemming; C-T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Redox Regulation of Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase-Implications for Cardiovascular Health and Disease.

Authors:  Rebecca Charles; Philip Eaton
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 5.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery at Primary and Secondary Hospitals in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC's): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendation.

Authors:  Ravi Oodit; Bruce M Biccard; Eugenio Panieri; Adrian O Alvarez; Marianna R S Sioson; Salome Maswime; Viju Thomas; Hyla-Louise Kluyts; Carol J Peden; Hans D de Boer; Mary Brindle; Nader K Francis; Gregg Nelson; Ulf O Gustafsson; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 6.  State of the Art - Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Andreas Bogner; Johanna Kirchberg; Jürgen Weitz; Johannes Fritzmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-06-27

Review 7.  The gut microbiota and colorectal surgery outcomes: facts or hype? A narrative review.

Authors:  Annamaria Agnes; Caterina Puccioni; Domenico D'Ugo; Antonio Gasbarrini; Alberto Biondi; Roberto Persiani
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation only prior rectal surgery (MOBILE2): a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial-study protocol.

Authors:  Laura Koskenvuo; Pipsa Lunkka; Pirita Varpe; Marja Hyöty; Reetta Satokari; Carola Haapamäki; Anna Lepistö; Ville Sallinen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Locoregional recurrences after transanal total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer during implementation.

Authors:  S E van Oostendorp; H J Belgers; B T Bootsma; J C Hol; E J T H Belt; W Bleeker; F C Den Boer; A Demirkiran; M S Dunker; H F J Fabry; E J R Graaf; J J Knol; S J Oosterling; G D Slooter; D J A Sonneveld; A K Talsma; H L Van Westreenen; M Kusters; R Hompes; H J Bonjer; C Sietses; J B Tuynman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  IMARI: multi-Interventional program for prevention and early Management of Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection in Rectal cancer patIents: rationale and study protocol.

Authors:  M D Slooter; K Talboom; S Sharabiany; C P M van Helsdingen; S van Dieren; C Y Ponsioen; C Y Nio; E C J Consten; J H Wijsman; M A Boermeester; J P M Derikx; G D Musters; W A Bemelman; P J Tanis; R Hompes
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.