Literature DB >> 30801628

Measuring Hospital-Acquired Complications Associated With Low-Value Care.

Tim Badgery-Parker1,2, Sallie-Anne Pearson1,3, Susan Dunn4, Adam G Elshaug1.   

Abstract

Importance: Studies of low-value care have focused on the prevalence of low-value care interventions but have rarely quantified downstream consequences of these interventions for patients or the health care system. Objective: To measure immediate in-hospital harm associated with 7 low-value procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study with a descriptive analysis using hospital admission data from 225 public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia, was conducted from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. All 9330 episodes involving 1 of 7 low-value procedures were evaluated, including endoscopy for dyspepsia in people younger than 55 years (3689 episodes); knee arthroscopy for osteoarthritis or meniscal tears (3963 episodes); colonoscopy for constipation in people younger than 50 years (665 episodes); endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in asymptomatic, high-risk patients (508 episodes); carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic, high-risk patients (273 episodes); renal artery angioplasty (176 episodes); and spinal fusion for uncomplicated low back pain (56 episodes). Sixteen hospital-acquired complications (HACs) were used as a measure of harm associated with low-value care. Main Outcomes and Measures: For each low-value procedure, the percentage associated with any HAC and the difference in mean length of stay for patients receiving low-value care with and without HACs were calculated.
Results: Across the 225 hospitals and 9330 episodes of low-value care, rates of HACs were low for low-value endoscopy (4 [0.1%] episodes; 95% CI, 0.02%-0.2%), knee arthroscopy (18 [0.5%] episodes; 95% CI, 0.2%-0.7%), and colonoscopy (2 [0.3%] episodes; 95% CI, 0.0%-0.9%) but higher for low-value spinal fusion (4 [7.1%] episodes; 95% CI, 2.2%-11.5%), endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (76 [15.0%] episodes; 95% CI, 11.1%-19.7%), carotid endarterectomy (21 [7.7%] episodes; 95% CI, 5.2%-10.1%), and renal artery angioplasty (15 [8.5%] episodes; 95% CI, 5.8%-11.5%). For most procedures, the most common HAC was health care-associated infection, which accounted for 83 (26.3%) (95% CI, 21.8%-31.5%) of all HACs observed. The highest rate of health care-associated infection was 8.4% (95% CI, 5.2%-11.4%) for renal artery angioplasty. For all 7 low-value procedures, median length of stay for patients with an HAC was 2 times or more the median length of stay for patients without a complication. For example, median length of stay was 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 1-1) day for knee arthroscopy with no HACs but increased to 10.5 (IQR, 1.0-21.3) days for patients with an HAC. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that use of these 7 procedures in patients who probably should not receive them is harming some of those patients, consuming additional hospital resources, and potentially delaying care for other patients for whom the services would be appropriate. Although only some immediate consequences of just 7 low-value services were examined, harm related to all low-value procedures was noted, including high rates of harm for certain higher-risk procedures. The full burden of low-value care for patients and the health system is yet to be quantified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30801628      PMCID: PMC6450303          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  21 in total

1.  Contemporary results of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Karen Woo; Joy Garg; Robert J Hye; Ralph B Dilley
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Countering cognitive biases in minimising low value care.

Authors:  Ian A Scott; Jason Soon; Adam G Elshaug; Robyn Lindner
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 3.  Clinicians' Expectations of the Benefits and Harms of Treatments, Screening, and Tests: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tammy C Hoffmann; Chris Del Mar
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Choosing wisely: prevalence and correlates of low-value health care services in the United States.

Authors:  Carrie H Colla; Nancy E Morden; Thomas D Sequist; William L Schpero; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jun 25-Jul 1       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Identifying and acting on potentially inappropriate care.

Authors:  Stephen J Duckett; Peter Breadon; Danielle Romanes
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Early Trends Among Seven Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign.

Authors:  Alan Rosenberg; Abiy Agiro; Marc Gottlieb; John Barron; Peter Brady; Ying Liu; Cindy Li; Andrea DeVries
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Developing indicators for measuring low-value care: mapping Choosing Wisely recommendations to hospital data.

Authors:  Kelsey Chalmers; Tim Badgery-Parker; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Jonathan Brett; Ian A Scott; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-03-05

9.  A methodological protocol for selecting and quantifying low-value prescribing practices in routinely collected data: an Australian case study.

Authors:  Jonathan Brett; Adam G Elshaug; R Sacha Bhatia; Kelsey Chalmers; Tim Badgery-Parker; Sallie-Anne Pearson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Setting a research agenda for medical overuse.

Authors:  Daniel J Morgan; Shannon Brownlee; Aaron L Leppin; Nancy Kressin; Sanket S Dhruva; Les Levin; Bruce E Landon; Mark A Zezza; Harald Schmidt; Vikas Saini; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-08-25
View more
  15 in total

1.  De-implementing low value care in critically ill patients: a call for action-less is more.

Authors:  Henry T Stelfox; Annette M Bourgault; Daniel J Niven
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Associations Between Low-Value Medication in Dementia and Healthcare Costs.

Authors:  Moritz Platen; Steffen Flessa; Anika Rädke; Diana Wucherer; Jochen René Thyrian; Annelie Scharf; Wiebke Mohr; Franka Mühlichen; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Bernhard Michalowsky
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.580

3.  Adverse Events and Hospital-Acquired Conditions Associated With Potential Low-Value Care in Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Kelsey Chalmers; Valérie Gopinath; Shannon Brownlee; Vikas Saini; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2021-07-23

4.  Longitudinal Content Analysis of the Characteristics and Expected Impact of Low-Value Services Identified in US Choosing Wisely Recommendations.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Nitya Thakore; Meredith B Rosenthal; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Engaging patients in de-implementation interventions to reduce low-value clinical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma E Sypes; Chloe de Grood; Liam Whalen-Browne; Fiona M Clement; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Daniel J Niven; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Does de-implementation of low-value care impact the patient-clinician relationship? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Michelle S Rockwell; Kenan C Michaels; John W Epling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Development and Use of a Calculator to Measure Pediatric Low-Value Care Delivered in US Children's Hospitals.

Authors:  Samantha A House; Matthew Hall; Shawn L Ralston; Jennifer R Marin; Eric R Coon; Alan R Schroeder; Heidi Gruhler De Souza; Amber Davidson; Patti Duda; Timmy Ho; Marquita C Genies; Marcos Mestre; Mario A Reyes
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01

8.  Nonlinear association of nurse staffing and readmissions uncovered in machine learning analysis.

Authors:  Olga Yakusheva; James T Bang; Ronda G Hughes; Kathleen L Bobay; Linda Costa; Marianne E Weiss
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Hospital characteristics associated with low-value care in public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Tim Badgery-Parker; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Understanding the public's role in reducing low-value care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Emma E Sypes; Chloe de Grood; Fiona M Clement; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Liam Whalen-Browne; Henry T Stelfox; Daniel J Niven
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.