| Literature DB >> 30800881 |
Cory Pitre1,2, Katie Pettit1,3, Lauren Ladd4,5, Carey Chisholm6,7, Julie L Welch8,9.
Abstract
Introduction: Time management is an essential skill set for physicians. The importance of time management is not routinely emphasized in undergraduate or graduate medical education curricula, often resulting in the development of poor time-management practices early in training. Improving time-management practices may lead to decreased stress, increased productivity, and improved well-being for physicians.Entities:
Keywords: Career Satisfaction; Faculty Development; Physician Well-Being; Professional Development; Time Management
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30800881 PMCID: PMC6342364 DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MedEdPORTAL ISSN: 2374-8265
Suggested Time Line for 90-Minute Workshop
| Time | Item | Presentation Slides and Activities | Appendix | Educational Objective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 min. | Introduction, framing, and learning objectives | Slides 1–7 | A | 1 |
| Slides 3 & 5 large-group responses | ||||
| 7 min. | Productivity reflection and discussion | Slide 8 | A, B | 1, 2 |
| Work in groups of 2–3 (pair) to discuss, then share in large group. | ||||
| 5 min. | Time management and physician well-being | Slides 9–11 | A | 1 |
| 8 min. | Procrastination | Slide 12 | A, C | 2, 3 |
| 5 min. | Priorities and goals | Slides 13–14 | A | 3 |
| 5 min. | Multitasking myth | Slides 15–16 | A, D | 2 |
| Ask participants to complete activity, then discuss. | ||||
| 5 min. | Cognitive load theory | Slides 17–18 | A | 2 |
| 3 min. | Where is time spent? | Slide 19 | A | 2, 3 |
| 5 min. | Managing workflow | Slides 20–22 | A | 4 |
| 5 min. | Time-Management Inventory | Slides 23–24 | A, E | 4 |
| 30 min. | Small-group activities | Slide 25 | F, G, H | 3, 4 |
| 1 min. | Conclusion and summary | Slides 26–27 | A | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
| 3 min. | Q&A and program evaluation | Open to discussion. Complete evaluation. | I |
Average Time-Management Workshop Evaluation Scores for Four Different Workshops
| Evaluation Question | EM Residents 08/03/17 | TY Residents 08/02/17 | TY Residents 01/04/17 | EM Residents 02/10/16 | Overall Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This session met its stated objectives. | 3.81 | 3.75 | 3.67 | 4.00 | 3.81 |
| This session information was presented in an organized manner. | 3.90 | 3.75 | 4.00 | 3.88 | 3.87 |
| The presenter created an opportunity for interactive learning. | 3.86 | 3.92 | 4.00 | 3.88 | 3.87 |
| This session referenced current practices and evidence. | 3.77 | 3.67 | 4.00 | 3.75 | 3.76 |
| The scope of topic(s) was relevant to my level of training. | 3.68 | 3.83 | 3.67 | 3.88 | 3.74 |
| This session addressed a specific educational need. | 3.65 | 3.83 | 4.00 | 3.75 | 3.72 |
| I will use information learned in this session to enhance my practice. | 3.81 | 3.83 | 4.00 | 3.75 | 3.81 |
| I would recommend that my colleagues attend this session. | 3.81 | 3.83 | 4.00 | N/A | 3.83 |
| Overall rating of session (1 = | 3.87 | 3.75 | 4.00 | 3.88 | 3.85 |
| Overall rating of presenter (1 = | 3.90 | 3.75 | 4.00 | 3.88 | 3.87 |
| Was this session fair-balanced and free from commercial bias? (1 = | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
Abbreviations: EM, emergency medicine; TY, transitional year.
Except where indicated, scoring was based on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 4 = Strongly Agree).
Average based on N = 46 after excluding evaluations with N/A response to this question.
Qualitative Evaluation of Four Different Time-Management Sessions
| Evaluation Question | Main Themes ( |
|---|---|
| “What was the best thing about this session?” | Small-group work/sessions Time-management tools and resources provided Practical advice Real-life applications Technology tools and phone apps Interactive nature of the workshop |
| “What one thing about this session would you like to see improved?” | More time for group discussion More time to complete all three worksheets More technology/phone app examples |
Qualitative 4-Month Follow-Up Evaluation of August 2017 Time-Management Workshops
| Evaluation Question | Main Themes ( |
|---|---|
| “Have you incorporated any specific elements from this workshop into personal time-management practices?” | Scheduling tasks and allocating time (71.4%) Identifying individual values and priorities (64.3%) Task prioritization (42.9%) Generating effective goals (42.9%) Leveraging technology (35.7%) Preparing a mission statement (21.4%) Defining specific goal-related tasks (21.4%) Capturing ideas and tasks (14.3%) No, I have not incorporated any (14.3%) |
| “What barriers have impeded implementation of recommended time-management practices?” | Hijacked time or competing priorities (42.9%) Time wasters (42.9%) No perceived barriers (28.6%) Procrastination (21.4%) Lacking goals or goal clarity (21.4%) Recommendations felt overwhelming and I didn't know where to begin (14.3%) |
| “What additional resources could this workshop have provided to better promote effective time-management practices?” | Effective time allocation in the workplace Recommended implementation plan for incorporating strategies and tools Listing of recommended time-management tools Listing of outside work activities |
| “In the 4 months since this workshop, what differences have you noticed relative to stress, productivity, and well-being as a physician?” | Improved productivity, improved well-being, or decreased stress (8 comments) No change (4 comments) Positive impact of applying at least one new time-management strategy (3 comments) Decreased productivity (1 comment) |