Abbey J Hughes1, Jagriti Jackie Bhattarai2, Samira Paul3, Meghan Beier4. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division for Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: abbeyjhuges@Jhmi.edu. 2. American School of Professional Psychology at Argosy University Northern Virginia, Arlington, VA. 3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division for Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; American School of Professional Psychology at Argosy University Northern Virginia, Arlington, VA. 4. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division for Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which depressive symptoms and fatigue in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) are associated with discrepancies between subjective and objective cognitive impairment. METHODS: Ninety-nine adults with MS who were receiving care in a university-affiliated MS center completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), MS Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire (MSNQ), and Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS). Participants were classified as "Accurates," "Underestimators," or "Overestimators" based on discrepancies between their MSNQ (subjective) and BICAMS (objective) scores. Underestimators were individuals whose subjective scores were significantly worse than their objective scores. Overestimators exhibited the opposite profile. RESULTS: The PHQ-8 (r = 0.58) and FSS (r = 0.48) significantly correlated with the MSNQ, but not with the BICAMS (rs < 0.07). Underestimators (i.e., participants who underestimated their objective cognitive functioning) exhibited higher PHQ-8 and FSS scores compared to Accurates (ps < 0.01) and Overestimators (ps < 0.01). Optimal cut-scores of ≥6 on the PHQ-8 and ≥36 on the FSS provided fair accuracy (78% and 74%) for identifying Underestimators. Identification of Underestimators based on PHQ-8 and FSS scores was not moderated by any demographic or MS clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of mild levels of depression or significant fatigue, subjective cognitive measures are unlikely to provide accurate estimates of objective cognitive functioning. Objective cognitive measures are required for accurate identification of cognitive impairment.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which depressive symptoms and fatigue in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) are associated with discrepancies between subjective and objective cognitive impairment. METHODS: Ninety-nine adults with MS who were receiving care in a university-affiliated MS center completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), MS Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire (MSNQ), and Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS). Participants were classified as "Accurates," "Underestimators," or "Overestimators" based on discrepancies between their MSNQ (subjective) and BICAMS (objective) scores. Underestimators were individuals whose subjective scores were significantly worse than their objective scores. Overestimators exhibited the opposite profile. RESULTS: The PHQ-8 (r = 0.58) and FSS (r = 0.48) significantly correlated with the MSNQ, but not with the BICAMS (rs < 0.07). Underestimators (i.e., participants who underestimated their objective cognitive functioning) exhibited higher PHQ-8 and FSS scores compared to Accurates (ps < 0.01) and Overestimators (ps < 0.01). Optimal cut-scores of ≥6 on the PHQ-8 and ≥36 on the FSS provided fair accuracy (78% and 74%) for identifying Underestimators. Identification of Underestimators based on PHQ-8 and FSS scores was not moderated by any demographic or MS clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of mild levels of depression or significant fatigue, subjective cognitive measures are unlikely to provide accurate estimates of objective cognitive functioning. Objective cognitive measures are required for accurate identification of cognitive impairment.
Authors: Marcus W Koch; Scott Patten; Sandy Berzins; Simon Zhornitsky; Jamie Greenfield; Winona Wall; Luanne M Metz Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: R Bakshi; Z A Shaikh; R S Miletich; D Czarnecki; J Dmochowski; K Henschel; V Janardhan; N Dubey; P R Kinkel Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Ralph H B Benedict; Darcy Cox; Laetitia L Thompson; Fred Foley; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Frederick Munschauer Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Kirsten Sjonnesen; Sandy Berzins; Kirsten M Fiest; Andrew G M Bulloch; Luanne M Metz; Brett D Thombs; Scott B Patten Journal: Postgrad Med Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Meghan Beier; Elizabeth S Gromisch; Abbey J Hughes; Kevin N Alschuler; Renee Madathil; Nancy Chiaravalloti; Frederick W Foley Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 3.181