Literature DB >> 30796458

Chloroplasts Use Calcium Signals to Call for Help under Heat Stress.

Markus Teige1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30796458      PMCID: PMC6400106          DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcz039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0781            Impact factor:   4.927


× No keyword cloud information.
Although chloroplasts perform the essential steps of carbon assimilation and initiate many biosynthetic pathways, they are increasingly recognized as critical sensors of environmental response in plants (Stael et�al. 2015, Chan et�al. 2016, Kmiecik et�al. 2016). It is known for quite some time that the photosynthetic machinery in chloroplasts is susceptible to different stresses, with photosystem II (PSII) in particular being very sensitive to thermal damage (Berry and Bjorkman 1980). Plants employ a number of different mechanisms to enhance photoprotection under diverse stress conditions (Pinnola and Bassi 2018). Many of these mechanisms are specifically tailored to avoid damage to PSII. Recently, the small chloroplast heat-shock protein 21, a major protection factor for PSII, was shown to be activated by a retrograde chloroplast-to-nucleus signaling pathway (Chen et�al. 2017). While in the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, calcium has been implicated in the regulation of cyclic electron flow—another of those photoprotective mechanisms—via a small calcium sensor protein named CAS (Terashima et�al. 2012), the role of calcium in chloroplast stress responses of higher plants is still unclear. In this issue, Lenzoni and Knight (2019) show that increases in the absolute temperature elevate the free calcium concentration in chloroplasts (Lenzoni and Knight 2019). This response is specific to chloroplasts as a similar response is not detectable in the cytosol after a sudden shift from 20�C to 40�C (Fig.�1). Furthermore, the response was demonstrated to be dynamic, dose-dependent and dependent upon absolute temperature, not the rate of heating. Interestingly, a 30�C heat stimulus did not trigger a stromal calcium increase, indicating that this temperature presents a threshold for the chloroplast calcium heat response. When plants were exposed to consecutive heat stimulation of the same magnitude, the calcium signal showed attenuation, similar to the previously described cytosolic calcium signal upon cold treatments. However, in contrast to the cytosolic cold sensing, the chloroplast high temperature sensing seemed to be mostly dependent on the absolute temperature, rather than rate. Notably in this study, differences between different species could be observed. For example, tobacco required a temperature elevation to 45�C to trigger a calcium signal, which is comparable to that of Arabidopsis at 40�C. Mechanistically, the calcium signals were found to be partially dependent on the calcium-sensing CAS protein, which has been shown previously to regulate other chloroplast calcium signaling responses. Similar chloroplast calcium increases have been reported before in response to cold, salt and hyperosmotic stresses as well as pathogen elicitor molecules (Manzoor et�al. 2012, Nomura et�al. 2012). Thus, calcium is emerging to be an important stabilizer of the oxygen-evolving complex at PSII in addition to its involvement in regulatory and signaling events in chloroplasts; however, different mechanisms are clearly involved in the generation and regulation of calcium signals depending on the stimulus.
Fig. 1

Detection of calcium signals in chloroplasts and in the cytosol upon temperature changes. (A) Representative image of seedlings (brightfield, left) expressing aequorin either in the chloroplast (upper panel), or in the cytosol (lower panel), and their total aequorin signal output (right panels) for the time measured (including discharge), showing that the signal only appears in plant shoots of the chloroplast-targeted line, and in the entire seedling for lines harboring the cytosolic aequorin. The colors represent the aequorin signal intensity (calcium signal) in pseudocolors using a scale ranging from cold (low signal) to warm colors (strong signal). (B) Quantification of the calcium signal in response to temperature shifts in the chloroplast and the cytosol corresponding to seedlings shown in (A).

Detection of calcium signals in chloroplasts and in the cytosol upon temperature changes. (A) Representative image of seedlings (brightfield, left) expressing aequorin either in the chloroplast (upper panel), or in the cytosol (lower panel), and their total aequorin signal output (right panels) for the time measured (including discharge), showing that the signal only appears in plant shoots of the chloroplast-targeted line, and in the entire seedling for lines harboring the cytosolic aequorin. The colors represent the aequorin signal intensity (calcium signal) in pseudocolors using a scale ranging from cold (low signal) to warm colors (strong signal). (B) Quantification of the calcium signal in response to temperature shifts in the chloroplast and the cytosol corresponding to seedlings shown in (A).

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
  9 in total

1.  Increases in Absolute Temperature Stimulate Free Calcium Concentration Elevations in the Chloroplast.

Authors:  Gioia Lenzoni; Marc R Knight
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 2.  Learning the Languages of the Chloroplast: Retrograde Signaling and Beyond.

Authors:  Kai Xun Chan; Su Yin Phua; Peter Crisp; Ryan McQuinn; Barry J Pogson
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 3.  Novel connections in plant organellar signalling link different stress responses and signalling pathways.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Kmiecik; Manuela Leonardelli; Markus Teige
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  Chloroplast-mediated activation of plant immune signalling in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Hironari Nomura; Teiko Komori; Shuhei Uemura; Yui Kanda; Koji Shimotani; Kana Nakai; Takuya Furuichi; Kohsuke Takebayashi; Takanori Sugimoto; Satoshi Sano; I Nengah Suwastika; Eiichiro Fukusaki; Hirofumi Yoshioka; Yoichi Nakahira; Takashi Shiina
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Molecular mechanisms involved in plant photoprotection.

Authors:  Alberta Pinnola; Roberto Bassi
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.407

6.  Calcium signatures and signaling in cytosol and organelles of tobacco cells induced by plant defense elicitors.

Authors:  Hamid Manzoor; Annick Chiltz; Siham Madani; Parul Vatsa; Benoît Schoefs; Alain Pugin; Angela Garcia-Brugger
Journal:  Cell Calcium       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 6.817

7.  Identification of core subunits of photosystem II as action sites of HSP21, which is activated by the GUN5-mediated retrograde pathway in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Si-Ting Chen; Ning-Yu He; Juan-Hua Chen; Fang-Qing Guo
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Calcium-dependent regulation of cyclic photosynthetic electron transfer by a CAS, ANR1, and PGRL1 complex.

Authors:  Mia Terashima; Dimitris Petroutsos; Meike Hüdig; Irina Tolstygina; Kerstin Trompelt; Philipp Gäbelein; Christian Fufezan; Jörg Kudla; Stefan Weinl; Giovanni Finazzi; Michael Hippler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Plant innate immunity--sunny side up?

Authors:  Simon Stael; Przemyslaw Kmiecik; Patrick Willems; Katrien Van Der Kelen; Nuria S Coll; Markus Teige; Frank Van Breusegem
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 18.313

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Crosstalk between abscisic acid and nitric oxide under heat stress: exploring new vantage points.

Authors:  Noushina Iqbal; Shahid Umar; Nafees A Khan; Francisco J Corpas
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 2.  Ca2+/Calmodulin Complex Triggers CAMTA Transcriptional Machinery Under Stress in Plants: Signaling Cascade and Molecular Regulation.

Authors:  Zahra Iqbal; Mohammed Shariq Iqbal; Surendra Pratap Singh; Teerapong Buaboocha
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.753

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.