Literature DB >> 3079619

Stopping long-term dialysis. An empirical study of withdrawal of life-supporting treatment.

S Neu, C M Kjellstrand.   

Abstract

Dialysis was discontinued in 155 (9 percent) of 1766 patients being treated for end-stage renal disease, accounting for 22 percent of all deaths. Treatment was withdrawn more frequently in older than in younger non-diabetic patients, and more often in young diabetic patients than in young nondiabetic patients. Withdrawal was twice as common in nondiabetic patients with other degenerative disorders (P less than 0.005); in patients receiving intermittent peritoneal dialysis (P less than 0.025); and in patients living in nursing homes (P less than 0.025). Half the patients were competent when the decision to withdraw was made, and 39 percent of this group had no new preceding medical complications. Among incompetent patients, the physician initiated the decision for withdrawal in 73 percent, and the patient's family in 27 percent; all patients had recent medical complications. In the early 1970s the physician initiated the decision in 66 percent of all patients; in the early 1980s this figure had decreased to 30 percent (P less than 0.0005). We conclude that stopping treatment is a common mode of death in patients receiving long-term dialysis, particularly in those who are old and those who have complicating degenerative diseases. Because of the increasing age of patients on dialysis, withdrawal of treatment will probably become more common in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3079619     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198601023140103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  24 in total

1.  Achieving a person-centered approach to dialysis discontinuation: An historical perspective.

Authors:  Ann M O'Hare; Emma Murphy; Catherine R Butler; Claire A Richards
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Opportunities to improve end-of-life care in ESRD.

Authors:  Jane O Schell; Jean L Holley
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Survival after dialysis discontinuation and hospice enrollment for ESRD.

Authors:  Nina R O'Connor; Meredith Dougherty; Pamela S Harris; David J Casarett
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Quality of care and cost containment in the U.S. and U.K.

Authors:  B Jennett
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1989-09

5.  Staying the Course: Through End of Life in ESRD.

Authors:  Erica Perry; Sally Joy; Richard Swartz
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Hemodialysis in Canada: a first-class medical crisis.

Authors:  C M Kjellstrand; H Moody
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Advance care planning in elderly chronic dialysis patients.

Authors:  Jean L Holley
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Stopping treatment for end-stage renal failure: the rights of children and adolescents.

Authors:  L Doyal; P Henning
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support.

Authors:  N A Christakis; D A Asch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Medical specialists prefer to withdraw familiar technologies when discontinuing life support.

Authors:  N A Christakis; D A Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.