Literature DB >> 30796148

Discovering Associations Among Older Adults' Characteristics and Planned Nursing Interventions Using Electronic Health Record Data.

Grace Gao1, Madeleine J Kerr1, Ruth A Lindquist1, Chih-Lin Chi1, Michelle A Mathiason1, Karen A Monsen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Little is known about how nursing assessments of strengths and signs/symptoms inform intervention planning in assisted living communities. The purpose of this study was to discover associations among older adults' characteristics and their planned nursing interventions.
METHODS: This study employed a data-driven method, latent class analysis, using existing electronic health record data from a senior living community in the Midwest. A convenience sample comprised de-identified data of well-being assessments and care plans for 243 residents. Latent class analysis, descriptive, and inferential statistics were used to group the sample, summarize strengths and problems attributes, nursing interventions, and Knowledge, Behavior, and Status scores, and detect differences.
RESULTS: Three groups presented based on patterns of strengths and signs/symptoms combined with problem concepts: Living Well (n = 95) had more strengths and fewer signs/symptoms; Lower Strengths (n = 99) had fewer strengths and more signs/symptoms; and Resilient Survivors (n = 49) had more strengths and more signs/symptoms. Some associations were found among group characteristics and planned interventions. Living Well had the lowest average number of planned interventions per resident (Mean = 2.7; standard deviation [SD] = 1.7) followed by Lower Strengths (Mean = 3.8; SD = 2.6) and Resilient Survivors (Mean = 4.1; SD = 3.4). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study offers new knowledge in the use of a strengths-based ontology to facilitate a nursing discourse that leverages use of older adults' strengths to address their problems and support their living a healthier life. It also offers the potential to complement the problem-based infrastructure in clinical practice and documentation. © Copyright 2019 Springer Publishing Company, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data-driven research; older adults; problems; strengths; the Omaha System

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30796148      PMCID: PMC6847224          DOI: 10.1891/1541-6577.33.1.58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract        ISSN: 1541-6577            Impact factor:   0.688


  21 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity and quality of life in older adults.

Authors:  W J Rejeski; S L Mihalko
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Physical activity and functional limitations in older women: influence of self-efficacy.

Authors:  Edward McAuley; James F Konopack; Katherine S Morris; Robert W Motl; Liang Hu; Shawna E Doerksen; Karl Rosengren
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Predictors of maintaining cognitive function in older adults: the Health ABC study.

Authors:  K Yaffe; A J Fiocco; K Lindquist; E Vittinghoff; E M Simonsick; A B Newman; S Satterfield; C Rosano; S M Rubin; H N Ayonayon; T B Harris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  What big size you have! Using effect sizes to determine the impact of public health nursing interventions.

Authors:  K E Johnson; B J McMorris; L A Raynor; K A Monsen
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  A E Stuck; J M Walthert; T Nikolaus; C J Büla; C Hohmann; J C Beck
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Seeing the whole person: feasibility of using the Omaha System to describe strengths of older adults with chronic illness.

Authors:  Karen A Monsen; Diane E Holland; Ping W Fung-Houger; Catherine E Vanderboom
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 7.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.

Authors:  Kristiina Häyrinen; Kaija Saranto; Pirkko Nykänen
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Strengths and satisfaction across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Derek M Isaacowitz; George E Vaillant; Martin E P Seligman
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  2003

9.  Disability and care needs among older Americans.

Authors:  Vicki A Freedman; Brenda C Spillman
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  The Gap in Big Data: Getting to Wellbeing, Strengths, and a Whole-person Perspective.

Authors:  Karen A Monsen; Judith Peters; Sara Schlesner; Catherine E Vanderboom; Diane E Holland
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2015-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Disseminating Strengths-Oriented Best Practices in Diabetes Care Utilizing a Standardized Language within a Global Community.

Authors:  Grace Gao; Madeleine Kerr; Sarah Beman; Candice Bruhjell; Joyce Rudenick; Onkar Singh; Mehrdad Rafiei; Karen A Monsen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

2.  Understanding Whole-Person Health and Resilience During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: A Cross-sectional and Descriptive Correlation Study.

Authors:  Sripriya Rajamani; Robin Austin; Elena Geiger-Simpson; Ratchada Jantraporn; Suhyun Park; Karen A Monsen
Journal:  JMIR Nurs       Date:  2022-05-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.