Literature DB >> 30794725

Understanding the processes that Federally Qualified Health Centers use to select and implement colorectal cancer screening interventions: a qualitative study.

Jennifer Leeman1, Natoshia Askelson2, Linda K Ko3, Catherine L Rohweder4, Jade Avelis5, Alicia Best6, Daniela Friedman7, Karen Glanz8,9, Laura Seegmiller2, Lindsay Stradtman10, Robin C Vanderpool10.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is highly effective at reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality, yet screening rates remain suboptimal. Evidence-based interventions can increase screening rates, particularly when they target multiple levels (e.g., patients, providers, health care systems). However, effective interventions remain underutilized. Thus, there is a pressing need to build capacity to select and implement multilevel CRC screening interventions. We report on formative research aimed at understanding how Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) staff select and implement CRC screening interventions, which will inform development of capacity-building strategies. We report the qualitative findings from a study that used a mixed methods design, starting with a quantitative survey followed by a qualitative study. In-depth interviews were conducted with 28 staff from 14 FQHCs in 8 states. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided interview questions and data analysis. Related to the CFIR process domain, few respondents described conducting formal assessments of factors contributing to low screening rates prior to planning their interventions. Many described engaging champions, implementation leaders, and external change agents. Few described a systematic approach to executing implementation plans beyond conducting plan-do-study-act cycles. Reflection and evaluation consisted primarily of reviewing Uniform Data System performance measures. Findings also include themes related to factors influencing these implementation processes. Although FQHCs are implementing CRC screening interventions, they are not actively targeting the multilevel factors influencing their CRC screening rates. Our findings on gaps in FQHCs' implementation processes will inform development of strategies to build capacity to select and implement multilevel CRC screening interventions. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer screening; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Evidence-based decision-making; Evidence-based interventions

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30794725      PMCID: PMC7237542          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  20 in total

1.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

2.  Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation.

Authors:  Abraham Wandersman; Jennifer Duffy; Paul Flaspohler; Rita Noonan; Keri Lubell; Lindsey Stillman; Morris Blachman; Richard Dunville; Janet Saul
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2008-06

3.  Implementation and spread of interventions into the multilevel context of routine practice and policy: implications for the cancer care continuum.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Yano; Lawrence W Green; Karen Glanz; John Z Ayanian; Brian S Mittman; Veronica Chollette; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

Review 4.  Building Capacity for Evidence-Based Public Health: Reconciling the Pulls of Practice and the Push of Research.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Jonathan E Fielding; Lawrence W Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 5.  Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Briana Lawrence; Randy Elder; Shawna L Mercer; Katherine M Wilson; Barbara DeVinney; Stephanie Melillo; Michelle Carvalho; Stephen Taplin; Roshan Bastani; Barbara K Rimer; Sally W Vernon; Cathy Lee Melvin; Vicky Taylor; Maria Fernandez; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Amy B Knudsen; Ann G Zauber; Carolyn M Rutter; Steffie K Naber; V Paul Doria-Rose; Chester Pabiniak; Colden Johanson; Sara E Fischer; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Use of Evidence-Based Interventions and Implementation Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Swann Arp Adams; Catherine L Rohweder; Jennifer Leeman; Daniela B Friedman; Ziya Gizlice; Robin C Vanderpool; Natoshia Askelson; Alicia Best; Susan A Flocke; Karen Glanz; Linda K Ko; Michelle Kegler
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-12

8.  Assessing Levels and Correlates of Implementation of Evidence-Based Approaches for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study With Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Timothy J Walker; Betsy Risendal; Michelle C Kegler; Daniela B Friedman; Bryan J Weiner; Rebecca S Williams; Shin-Ping Tu; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2018-07-10

9.  Assessment of training and technical assistance needs of Colorectal Cancer Control Program Grantees in the U.S.

Authors:  Cam Escoffery; Peggy Hannon; Annette E Maxwell; Thuy Vu; Jennifer Leeman; Andrea Dwyer; Caitlin Mason; Shaina Sowles; Ketra Rice; Lindsay Gressard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Arica White; Trevor D Thompson; Mary C White; Susan A Sabatino; Janet de Moor; Paul V Doria-Rose; Ann M Geiger; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  6 in total

1.  "We understand our community": implementation of the Healthy Eating Healthy Aging program among community-based organizations.

Authors:  Judy Leong; Sou Hyun Jang; Sonia K Bishop; Emily V R Brown; Eun Jeong Lee; Linda K Ko
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Adoption of an Evidence-Based Intervention for Mammography Screening Adherence in Safety Net Clinics.

Authors:  Jennifer Holcomb; Gayla Ferguson; Isabel Roth; Gretchen Walton; Linda Highfield
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-04

3.  Integrated interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of multiple cancer screenings: conceptual framework, determinants of implementation success, measurement challenges, and research priorities.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Florence K L Tangka; Sonja Hoover; Amy DeGroff
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-10-05

4.  Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation: a Mixed Methods Pilot Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Kelly A Aschbrenner; Gina Kruse; Karen M Emmons; Deepinder Singh; Marjanna E Barber-Dubois; Angela M Miller; Annette N Thomas; Stephen J Bartels
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2022-10-04

5.  A Multilevel Approach to Understand the Context and Potential Solutions for Low Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Rates in Rural Appalachia Clinics.

Authors:  Jamie Zoellner; Kathleen Porter; Esther Thatcher; Erin Kennedy; James L Werth; Betsy Grossman; Tomas Roatsey; Heather Hamilton; Roger Anderson; Wendy Cohn
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.667

6.  Understanding quality improvement collaboratives through an implementation science lens.

Authors:  Catherine Rohweder; Mary Wangen; Molly Black; Heather Dolinger; Marti Wolf; Carey O'Reilly; Heather Brandt; Jennifer Leeman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.018

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.