| Literature DB >> 30793853 |
Rafael Campos-Cuerva1,2,3, Beatriz Fernández-Muñoz2,4, Francisco Farfán López5, Sheila Pereira Arenas4, Mónica Santos-González1,2, Luis Lopez-Navas6, Miguel Alaminos7,8, Antonio Campos7,8, Jordi Muntané4,9, Carmen Cepeda-Franco4,10, Miguel Ángel Gómez-Bravo4,9,10.
Abstract
Blood loss remains a major concern during surgery and can increase the morbidity of the intervention. The use of topical haemostatic agents to overcome this issue therefore becomes necessary. Fibrin sealants are promising haemostatic agents due to their capacity to promote coagulation, but their effectiveness and applicability need to be improved. We have compared the haemostatic efficacy of a novel nanostructured fibrin-agarose hydrogel patch, with (c-NFAH) or without cells (a-NFAH), against two commercially available haemostatic agents in a rat model of hepatic resection. Hepatic resections were performed by making short or long incisions (mild or severe model, respectively), and haemostatic agents were applied to evaluate time to haemostasis, presence of haematoma, post-operative adhesions to adjacent tissues, and inflammation factors. We found a significantly higher haemostatic success rate (time to haemostasis) with a-NFAH than with other commercial haemostatic agents. Furthermore, other relevant outcomes investigated were also improved in the a-NFAH group, including no presence of haematoma, lower adhesions, and lower grades of haemorrhage, inflammation, and necrosis in histological analysis. Overall, these findings identify a-NFAH as a promising haemostatic agent in liver resection and likely in a range of surgical procedures.Entities:
Keywords: bleeding; fibrin agarose hydrogel; fibrin sealant; haemostasis; haemostatic agent; liver resection; nanostructured biomaterial; surgery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30793853 PMCID: PMC6594136 DOI: 10.1002/term.2831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tissue Eng Regen Med ISSN: 1932-6254 Impact factor: 3.963
Figure 1Generation and application of nanostructurated fibrin‐agarose hydrogel (NFAH). (a) Generation scheme of NFAH. (b) Sequential NFAH application on rat hepatic resection. Images show hepatic incision, wound exposition (1–3), NFAH application, and final positioning (4–6). (c,d) Time to haemostasis for rats subjected to (c) short and (d) long hepatic incision treated with different haemostatic agents (N = 10). Data represent mean ± SEM. Mann–Whitney U test was used for experiments with two groups, whereas the analysis between more than two groups was performed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance test followed by Dunn's post hoc test (**p < 0.01) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Categorization criteria for histological variables studied by microscopic analysis
| Variable | Category | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absent | Mild | Moderate | Intense | |
| Haemorrhage | Groups of erythrocytes that come together without forming a free zone of haemorrhage | Area of haemorrhage: <1‐mm diameter | Area of haemorrhage: 1‐to 2.5‐mm diameter and less than ×40 hpf of depth | Area of haemorrhage: >2.5‐mm diameter or more than ×40 hpf of depth |
| Inflammation | — | Few granulocytes | Some infiltrates, perivascular cuffing | Massive infiltration |
| Necrosis | — | 0.1–0.4 hpf | 0.5–1.2 hpf | >1.2 hpf |
Note. hpf: high‐power fields.
Figure 2Hepatic haematoma and adhesion grade for different haemostatic agents in rats subjected to long hepatic incisions. (a) Percentage of rats with hepatic haematoma 24 hr after treatment application. (b,c) Representative images of haematoma using PCC (b) and a‐NFAH (c). (d) Adhesion grade of different haemostatic agents. Adhesion in each sample was classified by a score of 0–2: 0, no adhesion; 1, thin adhesions separable by gravity; and 2, thick adhesions not separable by gravity. (e,f) Representative images of adhesion in long hepatic incisions treated with PCC (e) and a‐NFAH (f). c‐NFAH: cellularized‐nanostructurated fibrin‐agarose hydrogel; a‐NFAH: acellular‐nanostructurated fibrin‐agarose hydrogel; FTC: fibrinogen/thrombin‐coated collagen pad (Tachosil®); PCC: protein‐reactive polyethylene glycol‐coated collagen pad (Hemopatch®) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3Inflammation factor levels in rats subjected to long hepatic incision after haemostatic treatment. (a) CRP, (b) IL‐1β, and (c) TNF‐α blood levels measured by ELISA after 24 hr in rats with long hepatic incision treated with c‐NFAH, a‐NFAH, PCC, or FTC. Data represent mean ± SEM. Data were analysed using Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance test followed by Dunn's post hoc test (N = 7–15); *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. c‐NFAH: cellularized‐nanostructurated fibrin‐agarose hydrogel; a‐NFAH: acellular‐nanostructurated fibrin‐agarose hydrogel; FTC: fibrinogen/thrombin‐coated collagen pad (Tachosil®); PCC: protein‐reactive polyethylene glycol‐coated collagen pad (Hemopatch®); CRP: C‐reactive protein; IL‐1β: interleukin 1 beta; TNF‐α: tumour necrosis factor alpha
Figure 4Haemorrhage, inflammation, and necrosis scores in rats subjected to long hepatic incision treated with different haemostatic agents. (a) Representative histological images showing different grades of haemorrhage, inflammation, and necrosis. (b) Percentage of rats with haemorrhage (left), inflammation (middle), and necrosis (right) in long hepatic incision treated with PCC, FTC, c‐NFAH, or a‐NFAH. Each sample was classified as absent, mild, moderate, or intense (see Table 1 for categorization). c‐NFAH: cellularized‐nanostructurated fibrin‐agarose hydrogel; a‐NFAH: acellular‐nanostructurated fibrin‐agarose hydrogel; FTC: fibrinogen/thrombin‐coated collagen pad (Tachosil®); PCC: protein‐reactive polyethylene glycol‐coated collagen pad (Hemopatch®) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]