| Literature DB >> 30792425 |
C A Barboza1, A R Fukushima2, N Carrozzi3, J F Machi4, P M M Dourado5, C T Mostarda6, M C Irigoyen5, L Nathanson4, M Morris4, E C Caperuto3, B Rodrigues7.
Abstract
Inflammatory processes and cardiovascular autonomic imbalance are very relevant characteristic of the enormous dynamic process that is a myocardial infarction (MI). In this sense, some studies are investigating pharmacological therapies using acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, such as pyridostigmine bromide (PYR), aiming to increase parasympathetic tone after MI. Here we hypothesized that the use of PYR before the MI might bring an additional positive effect to the autonomic function, and consequently, in the inflammatory response and cardiac function. The present study aimed to evaluate left ventricular function, baroreflex sensitivity, autonomic modulation, and inflammatory profile in PYR-treated rats previously to MI.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30792425 PMCID: PMC6385301 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-38841-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Echocardiographic measurements.
| C | I | TPI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVM (g) | 1.18 ± 0.03 | 1.16 ± 0.05 | 0.97 ± 0.04 |
| LVEDD (cm) | 0.68 ± 0.01 | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 0.66 ± 0.02 |
| RWT | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.04 |
| E/A | 1.58 ± 0.15 | 2.63 ± 0.11* | 2.44 ± 0.17* |
| IVRT (ms) | 32 ± 4 | 34 ± 5 | 29 ± 2 |
| MPI | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.06 | 0.46 ± 0.05 |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest. LVM – left ventricle mass; LVEDD – left ventricle end diastolic diameter; RWT – relative wall thickness; E/A - E wave A wave ratio; IVRT – isovolumetric relaxation time; MPI – myocardial performance index. *P < 0.05 vs. C.
Figure 1Systolic function evaluated by echocardiogram. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest. (A) EF – ejection fraction; (B) FS – fractional shortening. *P < 0.05 vs. C; †P < 0.05 vs. I.
Hemodynamic parameters.
| C | I | TPI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAP (mmHg) | 119 ± 8 | 117 ± 9 | 122 ± 7 |
| DAP (mmHg) | 78 ± 5 | 83 ± 9 | 81 ± 10 |
| MAP(mmHg) | 94 ± 7 | 89 ± 9 | 96 ± 12 |
| HR (bpm) | 315 ± 12 | 347 ± 7* | 288 ± 7† |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest. SAP – systolic arterial pressure; DAP – diastolic arterial pressure; MAP – mean arterial pressure; HR – heart rate. P < 0.05 vs. C; †P < 0.05 vs. I.
Figure 2(A) Baroreflex sensitivity evaluated by tachycardic and bradycardic responses. (B) Sympathetic tone. (C) Vagal tone. *P < 0.05 vs. C; †P < 0.05 vs. I.
Pulse interval and systolic arterial pressure variabilities parameters.
| C | I | TPI | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Var-IP (ms2) | 119 ± 15 | 21 ± 2* | 64 ± 7*† |
| RMSSD (ms2) | 6.9 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.1* | 6.2 ± 0.1† |
| LF (ms2) | 6.2 ± 0.9 | 0.6 ± 0.1* | 3.4 ± 0.6† |
| LF (%) | 25.3 ± 1.9 | 13.8 ± 1.1* | 23.3 ± 2.1† |
| HF (ms2) | 16.6 ± 1.1 | 3.8 ± 0.2* | 13.6 ± 0.9† |
| HF (%) | 74.8 ± 2.4 | 87.2 ± 2.2 | 76.3 ± 3.0 |
| LF/HF | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 0.17 ± 0.04* | 0.33 ± 0.06 |
|
| |||
| Var-SAP (mmHg2) | 26.7 ± 2 | 30.1 ± 7 | 33.4 ± 7 |
| LF (mmHg2) | 6.5 ± 0.8 | 7.9 ± 1.3 | 5.9 ± 0.8 |
| α index (LF, ms/mmHg) | 1.32 ± 0.21 | 0.33 ± 0.05* | 0.86 ± 0.07 |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest. Var-IP – pulse interval variance; RMSSD - square root of the mean of successive RR interval differences; LF – low-frequency band; HF – high-frequency band; Var-SAP – systolic arterial pressure variance. *P < 0.05 vs. C; †P < 0.05 vs. I.
Figure 3Serum inflammatory markers. (A) IL-6. (B) IL-10. *P < 0.05 vs. C; †P < 0.05 vs. I.
Figure 5Inflammatory markers on white adipose tissue. (A) IFN-γ. (B) IL-6. (C) IL-1β. (D) TNF-α. (E) IL-10. (F) IL-10/ TNF-α. *P < 0.05 vs. C; †P < 0.05 vs. I.
Figure 4Inflammatory markers on the left ventricle. (A) IFN-γ. (B) IL-6. (C) IL-1β. (D) TNF-α. (E) IL-10. (F) IL-10/ TNF-α. *P < 0.05 vs. C; †P < 0.05 vs. I.