| Literature DB >> 30791432 |
Mikołaj Mizera1, Kornelia Lewandowska2, Andrzej Miklaszewski3, Judyta Cielecka-Piontek4.
Abstract
The problem of determining the formation of complexes of β-lactam antibiotics with cyclodextrins (CDs) and the interactions involved in this process were addressed by machine learning on multispectral images. Complexes of β-lactam antibiotics, including cefuroxime axetil, cefetamet pivoxil, and pivampicillin, as well as CDs, including αCD, βCD, γCD, hydroxypropyl-αCD, methyl-βCD, hydroxypropyl-βCD, and hydroxypropyl-γCD, were prepared in all combinations. Thermograms confirming the formation of cyclodextrin complexes were obtained using differential scanning calorimetry. Transmission Fourier-transform infrared (tFTIR) and complementary attenuated total reflectance FTIR (ATR) coupled with machine learning were techniques chosen as a nondestructive alternative. The machine learning algorithm was used to determine the formation of complexes in samples using solely their tFTIR and ATR spectra at the prediction stage. Parameterized method 7 (PM7) was used to support the analysis by molecular modeling of the complexes. The model developed through machine learning properly distinguished samples with formed complexes form noncomplexed samples with a cross-validation accuracy of 90.4%. Analysis of the contribution of spectral bands to the model indicated interactions of ester groups of β-lactam antibiotics with CDs, as well as some interactions of cephem ring in cefetamet pivoxil and penam moiety in pivampicillin. Molecular modeling with PM7 helped to explain experimental results and allowed to propose possible binding modes.Entities:
Keywords: cyclodextrin; machine learning; molecular modeling; multispectral analysis; β-lactam antibiotic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30791432 PMCID: PMC6413071 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24040743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Observed changes on the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of complexed samples, pure constituents, and physical mixtures.
| CA | CT | PA | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyclodextrin | Physical Mixture | Complex | Change | Physical Mixture | Complex | Change | Physical Mixture | Complex | Change |
|
| 77 °C | - | Intensity ↓ | 71 °C | - | Intensity ↓ | 76 °C | - | Intensity ↓ |
|
| 114 °C | 116 °C | Peak ↔ Intensity ↓ | 113 °C | - | Intensity ↓ | 120 °C | - | Intensity ↓ |
|
| 100 °C | 103 °C | Peak ↔ Intensity ↓ | 86 °C | 100 °C | Peak ↔ | 114 °C | 100 °C | Peak ↔ |
|
| - | - | No changes | 76 °C | 93 °C | Peak ↔, Intensity ↑ | 84 °C | 84 °C | Intensity ↑ |
|
| 83 °C | 87 °C | Peak ↔ Intensity ↓ | 83 °C | 91 °C | Intensity ↓ | 84 °C | 100 °C | Peak ↔ Intensity ↑ |
|
| 91 °C | 85 °C | Peak ↔ Intensity ↓ | 85 °C | 95 °C | Intensity ↑ | 84 °C | 94 °C | Peak ↔ Intensity ↓ |
|
| 89 °C | 92 °C | Peak ↔ | 93 °C | 93 °C | Intensity ↑ | 82 °C | 92 °C | Peak ↔ Intensity ↑ |
CA: cefuroxime axetil, CT: cefetamet pivoxil, PA: pivamipicillin.
Figure 1Optimized structure of prodrug β-lactam analogs and their maps of electrostatic potentials (MEPs).
Binding enthalpies of complexes conformations acquired according to machine learning results (experimentally favored) in relation to conformations favored in a simulated water environment.
| Cefuroxime axetil | Cefetamet pivoxil | Pivamipicillin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simulation Favored | Experimentally Favored | Simulation Favored | Experimentally Favored | Simulation Favored | Experimentally Favored | |
|
| −157.31 | −134.83 | −239.54 | −235.75 | −197.79 | −149.85 |
|
| −238.22 | −145.17 | −279.69 | −131.33 | −263.39 | −195.71 |
|
| −255.57 | −196.71 | −291.79 | −178.73 | −243.19 | −125.94 |
|
| 486.92 | 558.60 | −250.64 | −182.03 | −235.03 | −180.66 |
|
| −256.15 | −168.48 | −185.90 | −144.22 | −236.37 | −173.36 |
|
| −904.60 | 352.80 | −268.65 | −259.74 | −193.11 | −223.94 |
|
| −352.92 | −230.65 | −282.78 | −263.54 | −246.71 | −293.35 |
Testing predictions of the model, where True–complexed sample, False–physical mixture/noncomplexed sample.
| CA | CT | PA | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complexed | Physical mixtures | Complexed | Physical mixtures | Complexed | Physical mixtures | |||||||
| Predicted | True value | Predicted | True value | Predicted | True value | Predicted | True value | Predicted | True value | Predicted | True value | |
|
| True | True | True | False | True | True | False | False | True | True | False | False |
|
| True | True | False | False | True | True | False | False | True | True | False | False |
|
| True | True | False | False | True | True | False | False | True | True | False | False |
|
| False | False | False | False | True | True | False | False | True | True | False | False |
|
| False | True | False | False | True | True | False | False | True | True | False | False |
|
| True | True | False | False | True | True | True | False | True | True | False | False |
|
| True | True | False | False | False | True | False | False | True | True | False | False |
The spectral bands contributing to model, most important features first.
| API | Peak [cm−1] | Theoretical | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1772 | 1832 | C=O |
| 1264 | 1274 | C–O | |
|
| 1774 | 1838 | C=O |
| 1458 | 1479 | CH2 | |
| 1277 | 1275 | C-C | |
|
| 1774 | 1838 | C=O |
| 1458 | 1479 | CH2 | |
| 1371 | 1362 | C-H | |
| 1283 | 1293 | C-C |
Figure 2Experimental and theoretical spectra of CA, CT, and PA.