| Literature DB >> 30791368 |
Shafa Aria1, Yassine Elfarri2, Marius Elvegård3, Adam Gottfridsson4, Halvor S Grønaas5, Sigve Harang6, Anders Jansen7, Thomas Emil Rolland Madland8, Ivar Bruvik Martins9, Marius Wilhelm Olstad10, Tommy Lee Ryan11, Anwar Nazih Shaban12, Øyvind Løken Svenningsen13, Andre Djupvik Sørensen14, Emil Holm Ulvestad15, Ole Martin Vister16, Morten Bratgjerd Øvergaard17, Håvard Kalvøy18, Fred Johan Pettersen19,20, Hans Henrik Odland21, Vegard Munkeby Joten22, Øyvind Grannes Martinsen23, Christian Tronstad24, Ole Elvebakk25, Ørjan Grøttem Martinsen26,27.
Abstract
In this project, we have studied the use of electrical impedance cardiography as a possible method for measuring blood pulse wave velocity, and hence be an aid in the assessment of the degree of arteriosclerosis. Using two different four-electrode setups, we measured the timing of the systolic pulse at two locations, the upper arm and the thorax, and found that the pulse wave velocity was in general higher in older volunteers and furthermore that it was also more heart rate dependent for older subjects. We attribute this to the fact that the degree of arteriosclerosis typically increases with age and that stiffening of the arterial wall will make the arteries less able to comply with increased heart rate (and corresponding blood pressure), without leading to increased pulse wave velocity. In view of these findings, we conclude that impedance cardiography seems to be well suited and practical for pulse wave velocity measurements and possibly for the assessment of the degree of arteriosclerosis. However, further studies are needed for comparison between this approach and reference methods for pulse wave velocity and assessment of arteriosclerosis before any firm conclusions can be drawn.Entities:
Keywords: arteriosclerosis; bioimpedance; impedance cardiography; pulse wave velocity
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30791368 PMCID: PMC6412959 DOI: 10.3390/s19040850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Data for the test subjects. Values are in mean ± SD.
| Group | Male | Female | Age (years) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Younger | 5 | 5 | 24.6 ± 2.3 | 176.4 ± 7.2 | 71.3 ± 13.6 |
| Older | 5 | 5 | 68.2 ± 5.9 | 174.6 ± 8.7 | 75.7 ± 8.7 |
Figure 1Placement of electrodes for electrocardiogram (ECG) and impedance cardiogram (ICG) measurement. ECG was measured between electrodes B and E. Thorax ICG was measured by electrodes 1–4, picking up impedance changes between electrodes 2–3. Upper arm ICG was measured by electrodes A, C, D and F, picking up impedance changes between electrodes C and D.
Figure 2Example measurement showing ECG (blue), ICG across heart (red), and ICG on left arm (green). The ICG complexes are the calculated dZ/dt signals from the transfer impedance measurements. The bioimpedance-derived timing difference (ISTI) at the thorax (ISTI1) and upper arm (ISTI2) are marked in arrows, along with the RR interval.
Figure 3(a) The relation between ΔISTIc (distance-corrected ΔISTI, as explained earlier) and RR for the old (blue) and young (red) subjects. (b) The relation between the variables transformed to estimated PWV and heart rate. All observations pooled from the old and young age groups are plotted in blue and red circles respectively. Regression lines for the two groups from the linear mixed model are added to the plot (solid lines) with confidence intervals in black. Few outliers up to ΔISTIc = 0.41 s/m and PWV = 41.7 m/s are not shown for graph visibility.
Figure 4Examples of ECG and ICG recordings from different participants from both age groups during low and high heart rate. The people were sitting still on a stationary bike during the recordings. (a) Young participant in relaxed state, (b) young participant after an intense period of pedaling, (c) older participant in relaxed state, (d) older participant after an intense period of pedaling.