Louise M Thoma1, Hege Grindem2, David Logerstedt3, Michael Axe4, Lars Engebretsen2,5,6, May Arna Risberg2,5, Lynn Snyder-Mackler1. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA. 2. Norwegian Research Center for Active Rehabilitation, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway. 3. University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. First State Orthopedics, Newark, Delaware, USA. 5. Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 6. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some athletes demonstrate excellent dynamic stability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and return to sport without ACL reconstruction (ACLR) (copers). Others demonstrate persistent instability despite rehabilitation (noncopers) and require surgical stabilization. Testing to determine coper classification can identify potential copers early after rupture. It is unclear how coper classification changes after a brief intervention and how early classification relates to long-term outcomes. PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the consistency of early coper classification (potential coper vs noncoper) before and after progressive neuromuscular and strength training (NMST) among athletes early after acute ACL rupture and (2) to evaluate the association of early coper classification with 2-year success after ACL rupture. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: This was a prospective analysis from the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study, composed of athletes consecutively enrolled early after ACL rupture. Participants (n = 271) were tested and classified as potential copers or noncopers according to established criteria before and after a 10-session NMST program. Success 2 years after ACLR or nonoperative rehabilitation was defined as meeting or exceeding sex- and age-matched norms for knee function, no ACL graft rupture, and ≤1 episode of giving way within the previous year. The McNemar test evaluated changes in coper classification pre- to posttraining. Logistic regression adjusted for baseline characteristics was used to evaluate the association of early coper classification and surgical status with 2-year success. RESULTS: Of 300 athletes enrolled, 271 (90%) completed the posttraining data collection, and 219 (73%) returned for the 2-year follow-up. The coper classifications were different between time points: nearly half of those classified initially as noncopers became potential copers ( P < .001). At the 2-year follow-up, 66% of the ACLR group and 74% of the nonoperative group were successful. Athletes who were potential copers posttraining and chose ACLR or nonoperative rehabilitation had 2.7 (95% CI, 1.3-5.6) and 2.9 (95% CI, 1.2-7.2) times the odds of success, respectively, as compared with noncopers who chose ACLR. CONCLUSION: Coper classification improved after NMST; more athletes became potential copers. Athletes who were potential copers after NMST were more likely to succeed 2 years later regardless of whether they had surgery, strongly supporting the addition of NMST before ACLR. Persistent noncopers fared poorly, indicating that more intensive rehabilitation may be needed.
BACKGROUND: Some athletes demonstrate excellent dynamic stability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and return to sport without ACL reconstruction (ACLR) (copers). Others demonstrate persistent instability despite rehabilitation (noncopers) and require surgical stabilization. Testing to determine coper classification can identify potential copers early after rupture. It is unclear how coper classification changes after a brief intervention and how early classification relates to long-term outcomes. PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the consistency of early coper classification (potential coper vs noncoper) before and after progressive neuromuscular and strength training (NMST) among athletes early after acute ACL rupture and (2) to evaluate the association of early coper classification with 2-year success after ACL rupture. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: This was a prospective analysis from the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study, composed of athletes consecutively enrolled early after ACL rupture. Participants (n = 271) were tested and classified as potential copers or noncopers according to established criteria before and after a 10-session NMST program. Success 2 years after ACLR or nonoperative rehabilitation was defined as meeting or exceeding sex- and age-matched norms for knee function, no ACL graft rupture, and ≤1 episode of giving way within the previous year. The McNemar test evaluated changes in coper classification pre- to posttraining. Logistic regression adjusted for baseline characteristics was used to evaluate the association of early coper classification and surgical status with 2-year success. RESULTS: Of 300 athletes enrolled, 271 (90%) completed the posttraining data collection, and 219 (73%) returned for the 2-year follow-up. The coper classifications were different between time points: nearly half of those classified initially as noncopers became potential copers ( P < .001). At the 2-year follow-up, 66% of the ACLR group and 74% of the nonoperative group were successful. Athletes who were potential copers posttraining and chose ACLR or nonoperative rehabilitation had 2.7 (95% CI, 1.3-5.6) and 2.9 (95% CI, 1.2-7.2) times the odds of success, respectively, as compared with noncopers who chose ACLR. CONCLUSION: Coper classification improved after NMST; more athletes became potential copers. Athletes who were potential copers after NMST were more likely to succeed 2 years later regardless of whether they had surgery, strongly supporting the addition of NMST before ACLR. Persistent noncopers fared poorly, indicating that more intensive rehabilitation may be needed.
Authors: Mathew J Failla; David S Logerstedt; Hege Grindem; Michael J Axe; May Arna Risberg; Lars Engebretsen; Laura J Huston; Kurt P Spindler; Lynn Snyder-Mackler Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Hege Grindem; Ingrid Eitzen; Lars Engebretsen; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Marie Pedersen; Hege Grindem; Jessica L Johnson; Lars Engebretsen; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2021-08-18 Impact factor: 6.558
Authors: Theresa Diermeier; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Lars Engebretsen; Andrew D Lynch; Olufemi R Ayeni; Mark V Paterno; John W Xerogeanes; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson; Volker Musahl; Eleonor Svantesson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Thomas Rauer; Sean J Meredith Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2020-05-09 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Ramana Piussi; Daniel Broman; Erik Musslinder; Susanne Beischer; Roland Thomeé; Eric Hamrin Senorski Journal: BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Date: 2020-12-10
Authors: Ignacio Manchado; David Alvarez; Luci M Motta; Gustavo Blanco; Pedro Saavedra; Gerardo L Garcés Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 3.390