Literature DB >> 30790046

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for all pancreatic body and tail tumors: rationale and results.

Masillamany Sivasanker1, Ashwin Desouza2, Manish Bhandare2, Vikram Chaudhari2, Mahesh Goel2, Shailesh V Shrikhande3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has been propagated as the standard of care for pancreatic cancers involving the body and tail of the pancreas. This procedure has been shown to have promising results in enhancing the microscopically negative tangential resection margins as well as the lymph node yield.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database on the resections performed for all pancreatic body and tail tumors at Tata Memorial Centre.
RESULTS: Sixty-five patients underwent RAMPS without any perioperative mortality. The various pathologies comprised of adenocarcinoma (41.5%), neuroendocrine tumors (12.3%), solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (15.3%), cystic neoplasms (15.2%), etc. The R0 resection rate was 87.7%. Among this cohort, 27 patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The 3-year OS and DFS for distal pancreatic cancers were 56% and 38%, respectively, but 3-year OS and DFS for other distal pancreatic tumors were 97% and 73%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, R0 resection significantly improved disease-free survival (p = 0.023) for pancreatic cancer.
CONCLUSION: RAMPS procedure aids to achieve high negative tangential margins for all tumors involving the body and tail of the pancreas and not just pancreatic cancer in isolation. Since preoperative histologic diagnosis is not routinely indicated and also a number of other distal pancreatic tumors carry a relatively better prognosis compared with pancreatic cancer, our results provide further evidence that RAMPS should be considered as the procedure of choice for all operable tumors involving body and tail of the pancreas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal pancreatosplenectomy; Pancreatic tumors; Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30790046     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01763-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  5 in total

Review 1.  Incidence and risk factors for Chyle leak after pancreatic surgery for cancer: A comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Milena Muzzolini; Raphael L C Araujo; T Peter Kingham; Frédérique Peschaud; François Paye; Renato M Lupinacci
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Complications in Distal Pancreatectomy versus Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy: A Disease Risk Score Analysis Utilizing National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Data.

Authors:  Thomas L Sutton; Kristin C Potter; Skye C Mayo; Rodney Pommier; Erin W Gilbert; Brett C Sheppard
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant disease: a review of techniques and results.

Authors:  Danilo Coco; Silvana Leanza; Riccardo Schillaci; Giuseppe Angelo Reina
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-10-01

Review 4.  Improvement in distal pancreatectomy for tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Deng Ning; Xiao-Ping Chen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Innovations in pancreatic anastomosis technique during pancreatoduodenectomies.

Authors:  S Ferencz; Zs Bíró; A Vereczkei; D Kelemen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.445

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.