| Literature DB >> 30789675 |
Joshua M Stern1, Marcia Urban-Maldonado1, Mykhaylo Usyk2, Ignacio Granja3, Daniel Schoenfeld1, Kelvin P Davies1, Ilir Agalliu4, John Asplin3, Robert Burk2, Sylvia O Suadicani1.
Abstract
Urinary stone disease (USD) is a major health concern. There is a need for new treatment modalities. Recently, our group provided evidence for an association between the GMB composition and USD. The accessibility of the Gut Microbiome (GMB) makes it an attractive target for investigation and therefore, in these studies we have evaluated the extent to which the whole gut microbial community in fecal transplants can affect urinary stone risk parameters in an animal model. Fresh fecal pellets were collected from Zucker lean rats, homogenized in PBS (100 mg/mL), filtered through a 70 μm strainer and then orally gavaged into C57BL/6NTac germ-free mice. Twenty-four hours urine collections and GMB analysis were performed over time for 1 month. Kidney and gut tissue were harvested from transplanted mice for western blot analysis of expression levels of the Slc26a6 transporter involved in oxalate balance. Urinary calcium decreased after fecal transplant by 55% (P < 0.001). Urinary oxalate levels were on average 24% lower than baseline levels (P < 0.001). Clostridiaceae family was negatively correlated with urinary oxalate at 4 weeks after transplant (r = -0.83, P < 0.01). There was a 0.6 unit average increase in urinary pH from a baseline of 5.85 (SE ± 0.028) to 6.49 (SE ± 0.04) (P < 0.001) after transplant. There was a concomitant 29% increase in gastrointestinal alkali absorption (P < 0.001) 4-weeks after fecal transplant. Slc26a6 expression increased by 90% in the cecum after transplant. Our results suggest that the gut microbiome may impact metabolism, alters urinary chemistry, and thereby may influence USD; the accessibility of the GMB can potentially be leveraged for therapeutic interventions.Entities:
Keywords: Calcium; gut microbiome; kidney stones; oxalate; urinary stone disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30789675 PMCID: PMC6383111 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1Fecal transplant into germ‐free mice. Two independent transplant experiments were performed with fecal pellets obtained from a single but different rat donor. Heat maps of the most abundant bacteria detected in the stool samples from (A) Rat donor 1 (yellow box) and from 4 fecal transplant recipient mice (note that at baseline in group A, n = 1 of the germ‐free pre‐transplanted mice did not have sufficient bacterial load to report and in group B n = 2 of the germ‐free pre‐transplanted mice did not have sufficient bacterial load to report), and from (B) Rat donor 2 (yellow box) and 5 recipient mice. Germ‐free recipient mice were sampled at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks after fecal transplant. Hierarchical clustering in panels A and B indicate that both sets of mice acquired and maintained the donor's gut microbiome. (C) Community ordination using bray‐distances, visualized using non‐metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) showed that there were significant community differences in the microbiome that could be explained using the transplant variables (R 2 = 0.416, P = 0.001). Prior to transplant the mice had a highly variable microbiome as indicated by the wide dispersion of samples across the NMDS plot, but formed tighter clusters surrounding the donors following transplant. Distribution of organisms at the genus level in stool samples are shown.
Figure 2Body weight of germ‐free mice at baseline and at 4 weeks after receiving fecal transplant. Animals in both control (CTR) and fecal transplanted (FT) groups gained significant weight along the 4 weeks of the experiment when compared to baseline values. Body weight gain was not different between CTR and FT germ‐free mice. Data correspond to mean ± SEM; n = 9 per group; Student's t‐test: **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3Urinary Chemistry at baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after fecal transplant. 24‐h urine parameters were normalized by creatinine (Cr). Data correspond to mean±SEM, n = 9 baseline and n = 9 subsequently transplanted mice. Statistical difference compared to baseline with pairwise comparison *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 4Fecal transplantation alters protein expression of Slc26A6 transporter involved in secretion of oxalate. (A) Western blot for the Slc26A6 transporter in kidney, ileum, cecum and colon tissues harvested from germ‐free age match controls and fecal transplanted mice at 4‐weeks after transplanted. Average Slc26A6 receptor protein levels, indicating that in fecal transplanted animals, Slc26A6 expression in the kidney decreased by 40.25% (P = 0.0137). There was no significant difference in expression observed in the ileum. Cecum Slc26A6 increased by 90% as compared to control (P = 0.0005) and colon Slc26A6 decreased by 38.50% (P = 0.0051) when compared to controls. Protein band intensities were first normalized by the GAPDH loading control and then by their respective controls and expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 6 age match controls and 8 fecal‐transplanted mice (1 mouse died prior to tissues collection); Student's t‐test compared to controls: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.