Literature DB >> 30789231

Variability of repairable bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: towards an anatomical and repair-oriented classification.

Laurent de Kerchove1, Stefano Mastrobuoni1, Lennart Froede2, Saadallah Tamer1, Munir Boodhwani3, Michel van Dyck4, Gebrine El Khoury1, Hans-Joachim Schäfers2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: : The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) exists in a wide variety of valve phenotypes. The aim of this study was to assess the anatomical characteristics of the different phenotypes and develop a classification system to aid surgical repair.
METHODS: : In 178 consecutive patients operated on for aortic insufficiency or aortic dilatation in 2 centres, 11 anatomical parameters of BAV were measured by echocardiography and intraoperatively. All BAV judged potentially repairable were included in the study.
RESULTS: : Commissural orientation correlated positively with fusion length (R2 = 0.6, P < 0.001) and negatively with non-functional commissure height (R2 = 0.45, P < 0.001). The cohort was divided into 3 groups according to their commissural orientation (type A: symmetrical, 160-180°, n = 73; type B: asymmetrical, 140-159°, n = 74; and type C: very asymmetrical, 120-139°, n = 31). The patterns of cusp fusion, annulus and aortic size were similar among the groups. Fusion length and the geometric height of the cusps decreased from type A to C; non-functional commissure height increased from type A to C (P < 0.05). Patient age increased from type A to type C. Isolated aortic dilatation was more frequent in type A, and severe aortic insufficiency was more frequent in types B and C (P < 0.05). Valve repair techniques and management of commissural orientation varied among the 3 groups (P < 0.05). Aortic valve replacement and residual aortic insufficiency after repair were more frequent in type C (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: : The BAV phenotypes follow a continuous spectrum that extends from symmetrical to very asymmetrical BAV. We describe the main anatomical parameters (including commissure orientation, length of fusion and non-functional commissure height) and their variation across this spectrum. We propose a new repair-oriented classification system based on those parameters that can be used to predict valve repair techniques. This classification needs further validation with regards to surgical techniques and long-term outcomes.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Aortic regurgitation; Aortic root aneurysm; Aortic valve repair; Bicuspid aortic valve; Classification; Valve sparing

Year:  2019        PMID: 30789231     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  13 in total

1.  Aortic valve repair with a newly approved geometric annuloplasty ring in patients undergoing proximal aortic repair: early results from a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Oliver K Jawitz; Vignesh Raman; Jatin Anand; Muath Bishawi; Soraya L Voigt; Julie Doberne; Andrew M Vekstein; E Hope Weissler; Joseph W Turek; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Early results after aortic annuloplasty with a complete external Dacron band.

Authors:  John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Jan Otto Beitnes; Runar Lundblad
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-09-20

3.  Reimplantation should be the gold standard to treat the regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Jama Jahanyar; Gebrine El Khoury; Laurent de Kerchove
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 4.  Bicuspid aortic valve repair: systematic review on long-term outcomes.

Authors:  George J Arnaoutakis; Ibrahim Sultan; Mary Siki; Joseph E Bavaria
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-05

5.  Novel bicuspid aortic valve model with aortic regurgitation for hemodynamic status analysis using an ex vivo simulator.

Authors:  Yuanjia Zhu; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Michael J Paulsen; Bryant Priromprintr; Hanjay Wang; Haley J Lucian; Justin M Farry; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes.

Authors:  Hector I Michelena; Alessandro Della Corte; Arturo Evangelista; Joseph J Maleszewski; William D Edwards; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Borja Fernández; Federico M Asch; Alex J Barker; Lilia M Sierra-Galan; Laurent De Kerchove; Susan M Fernandes; Paul W M Fedak; Evaldas Girdauskas; Victoria Delgado; Suhny Abbara; Emmanuel Lansac; Siddharth K Prakash; Malenka M Bissell; Bogdan A Popescu; Michael D Hope; Marta Sitges; Vinod H Thourani; Phillippe Pibarot; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Patrizio Lancellotti; Michael A Borger; John K Forrest; John Webb; Dianna M Milewicz; Raj Makkaar; Martin B Leon; Stephen P Sanders; Michael Markl; Victor A Ferrari; William C Roberts; Jae-Kwan Song; Philipp Blanke; Charles S White; Samuel Siu; Lars G Svensson; Alan C Braverman; Joseph Bavaria; Thoralf M Sundt; Gebrine El Khoury; Ruggero De Paulis; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Jeroen J Bax; Catherine M Otto; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-07-22

Review 7.  Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis: From Pathophysiological Mechanism, Imaging Diagnosis, to Clinical Treatment Methods.

Authors:  Nils Perrin; Réda Ibrahim; Nicolas Dürrleman; Arsène Basmadjian; Lionel Leroux; Philippe Demers; Thomas Modine; Walid Ben Ali
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-08

8.  Aortic annuloplasty: Subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal rings.

Authors:  Jan M Federspiel; Tristan Ehrlich; Karen Abeln; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-01-28

9.  Bicuspid aortic valve repair: outcomes after 17 years of experience.

Authors:  Marek J Jasinski; Kinga Kosiorowska; Radoslaw Gocol; Jakub Jasinski; Rafal Nowicki; Grzegorz Bielicki; Mikolaj Berezowski; Roman Przybylski; Marta Obremska; Marceli Lukaszewski; Anna Larysz; Andrzej Kansy; Marek A Deja
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Commissural geometry and cusp fusion insights to guide bicuspid aortic valve repair.

Authors:  Jama Jahanyar; Gebrine El Khoury; Laurent de Kerchove
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.