BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NET) is generally good, and radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres is a locoregional therapy that is used in efforts to improve hepatic disease control and survival. This study aims to describe the survival outcomes and toxicities associated with radioembolization for hepatic-predominant metastatic NET in a large single-institution cohort. METHODS: A total of 59 patients underwent radioembolization for metastatic NET with hepatic predominant disease at a single academic center. Patient outcomes were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and toxicities were detailed and described. Ten patients within the cohort underwent post-treatment dosimetric analysis using PET-MRI and normal liver dosimetry was correlated with hepatic fibrosis and toxicity. RESULTS: Median overall survival from time of radioembolization in the patient cohort was 31 months, and the 1- and 2-year overall survival was 80.4% and 65.6% respectively. Median hepatic progression-free survival and overall progression-free survival were 18 and 13 months, respectively. Three patients died of hepatic failure that was possibly therapy-related. Ten patients underwent evaluation of post-treatment dosimetry following radioembolization. In patients who did not develop hepatotoxicity or hepatic fibrosis, mean dose to normal liver was 25.4 Gy, while the mean liver dose in patients who experienced toxicity (hepatic fibrosis in n=2 and death from hepatic failure in n=1) was 59.1 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival following radioembolization for hepatic metastases from NET is excellent; however, deaths that are potentially treatment-related have been observed. Preliminary data regarding dose to normal liver is suggestive of a relation between dosimetry and toxicity, however further work is required to further elucidate the mechanism, correlation with dosimetry, as well as additional patient and tumor factors that may predispose these patients to toxicity.
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NET) is generally good, and radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres is a locoregional therapy that is used in efforts to improve hepatic disease control and survival. This study aims to describe the survival outcomes and toxicities associated with radioembolization for hepatic-predominant metastatic NET in a large single-institution cohort. METHODS: A total of 59 patients underwent radioembolization for metastatic NET with hepatic predominant disease at a single academic center. Patient outcomes were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and toxicities were detailed and described. Ten patients within the cohort underwent post-treatment dosimetric analysis using PET-MRI and normal liver dosimetry was correlated with hepatic fibrosis and toxicity. RESULTS: Median overall survival from time of radioembolization in the patient cohort was 31 months, and the 1- and 2-year overall survival was 80.4% and 65.6% respectively. Median hepatic progression-free survival and overall progression-free survival were 18 and 13 months, respectively. Three patients died of hepatic failure that was possibly therapy-related. Ten patients underwent evaluation of post-treatment dosimetry following radioembolization. In patients who did not develop hepatotoxicity or hepatic fibrosis, mean dose to normal liver was 25.4 Gy, while the mean liver dose in patients who experienced toxicity (hepatic fibrosis in n=2 and death from hepatic failure in n=1) was 59.1 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival following radioembolization for hepatic metastases from NET is excellent; however, deaths that are potentially treatment-related have been observed. Preliminary data regarding dose to normal liver is suggestive of a relation between dosimetry and toxicity, however further work is required to further elucidate the mechanism, correlation with dosimetry, as well as additional patient and tumor factors that may predispose these patients to toxicity.
Authors: J Bruix; M Sherman; J M Llovet; M Beaugrand; R Lencioni; A K Burroughs; E Christensen; L Pagliaro; M Colombo; J Rodés Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: K T Brown; B Y Koh; L A Brody; G I Getrajdman; J Susman; Y Fong; L H Blumgart Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Jens Rosenau; Matthias J Bahr; Reinhard von Wasielewski; Michael Mengel; Hartmut H J Schmidt; Björn Nashan; Hauke Lang; Jürgen Klempnauer; Michael P Manns; Klaus H W Boeker Journal: Transplantation Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Sanjay Gupta; Marcella M Johnson; Ravi Murthy; Kamran Ahrar; Michael J Wallace; David C Madoff; Stephen E McRae; Marshall E Hicks; Sujaya Rao; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jaffer A Ajani; James C Yao Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Maria A Kouvaraki; Jaffer A Ajani; Paulo Hoff; Robert Wolff; Douglas B Evans; Richard Lozano; James C Yao Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas Helmberger; Rita Golfieri; Maciej Pech; Thomas Pfammatter; Dirk Arnold; Roberto Cianni; Geert Maleux; Graham Munneke; Olivier Pellerin; Bora Peynircioglu; Bruno Sangro; Niklaus Schaefer; Niels de Jong; José Ignacio Bilbao Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Sander C Ebbers; Tessa Brabander; Margot E T Tesselaar; Johannes Hofland; Manon N G J A Braat; Frank J Wessels; Maarten W Barentsz; Marnix G E H Lam; Arthur J A T Braat Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 3.138