Literature DB >> 16134179

Hepatic arterial embolization and chemoembolization for the treatment of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: variables affecting response rates and survival.

Sanjay Gupta1, Marcella M Johnson, Ravi Murthy, Kamran Ahrar, Michael J Wallace, David C Madoff, Stephen E McRae, Marshall E Hicks, Sujaya Rao, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey, Jaffer A Ajani, James C Yao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic variables that influence response and survival in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors who are treated with hepatic arterial embolization (HAE) or chemoembolization (HACE).
METHODS: Patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors who underwent HAE or HACE were included in this retrospective study. Follow-up imaging studies were compared with baseline imaging to determine the radiologic response. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the prognostic variables that affected response and survival.
RESULTS: The study included 69 patients with carcinoid tumors and 54 patients with pancreatic islet cell carcinomas. Patients who had carcinoid tumors had a higher response rate (66.7% vs. 35.2%; P = 0.0001) and had longer PFS (22.7 mos vs. 16.1 mos; P = 0.046) and OS (33.8 mos vs. 23.2 mos; P = 0.012) compared with patients who had islet cell carcinomas. For patients with carcinoid tumors, multivariate analysis identified male gender as the only independent risk factor for poor survival (P = 0.05). Octreotide was predictive marginally for PFS (P = 0.06). Patients who were treated with HAE had a higher response rate than patients who were treated with HACE (P = 0.004). For patients with islet cell carcinoma, an intact primary tumor, > or = 75% liver involvement, and extrahepatic metastases were associated with reduced OS in the univariate analysis; the presence of bone metastases was the only risk factor (P = 0.031) in the multivariate analysis. Patients who were treated with HACE had a prolonged OS (31.5 mos vs. 18.2 mos) and improved response (50% vs. 25%) compared with patients who were treated with HAE, although the differences did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with carcinoid tumors had better outcomes than patients with islet cell carcinomas. The addition of intraarterial chemotherapy to HAE did not improve the outcome of patients with carcinoid tumors, but it seemed to benefit patients with islet cell carcinomas. In patients who had carcinoid tumors, male gender predicted a poor outcome, and a trend toward prolonged PFS was observed in patients who received concomitant octreotide. An intact primary tumor, extensive liver disease, and bone metastases were associated with reduced survival in patients with islet cell carcinomas. Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16134179     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  101 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pathways for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Angela Alistar; Max Sung; Michelle Kim; Randall F Holcombe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-12

2.  NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas.

Authors:  Matthew H Kulke; Lowell B Anthony; David L Bushnell; Wouter W de Herder; Stanley J Goldsmith; David S Klimstra; Stephen J Marx; Janice L Pasieka; Rodney F Pommier; James C Yao; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Liver abscess as a complication of hepatic transarterial chemoembolization: a case report, literature review, and clinical recommendations.

Authors:  Ari M Vanderwalde; Howard Marx; Lucille Leong
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11

4.  Phase II study of chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads in patients with hepatic neuroendocrine metastases: high incidence of biliary injury.

Authors:  Nikhil Bhagat; Diane K Reyes; Mingde Lin; Ihab Kamel; Timothy M Pawlik; Constantine Frangakis; J F Geschwind
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in 78 Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Hisato Igarashi; Nao Fujimori; Masayuki Hijioka; Ken Kawabe; Yoshinao Oda; Robert T Jensen; Tetsuhide Ito
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 6.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management.

Authors:  Zu-Yi Ma; Yuan-Feng Gong; Hong-Kai Zhuang; Zi-Xuan Zhou; Shan-Zhou Huang; Yi-Ping Zou; Bo-Wen Huang; Zhong-Hai Sun; Chuan-Zhao Zhang; Yun-Qiang Tang; Bao-Hua Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Intra-arterial liver-directed therapies for neuroendocrine hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 8.  Update on pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Logan R McKenna; Barish H Edil
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-11

Review 9.  Practical management and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Naoko Iwahashi Kondo; Yasuharu Ikeda
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-11

Review 10.  Emerging approaches in the management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis: role of liver-directed and systemic therapies.

Authors:  Skye C Mayo; Joseph M Herman; David Cosgrove; Nik Bhagat; Ihab Kamel; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.