Literature DB >> 26556086

Prediction of Affective Responses in Aerobic Exercise Sessions.

Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho Oliveira, Bruno Ferreira Viana, Flávio Oliveira Pires, Mário Júnior Oliveira, Tony Meireles Santos1.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to verify which physiological (percentage of maximum oxygen consumption--%VO2 or percentage of maximum heart rate--%HR) or psychological (ratings of perceived exertion--RPE) variable is the best predictor of affective responses during continuous (CT) and interval (HIT) exercise sessions. Fourteen men underwent 3 exercise sessions on the treadmill. In the first session, a graded exercise test was performed to determine the maximum HR, peak VO2, and the respiratory compensation point (RCP). Then, participants performed the CT and HIT exercise in a counterbalanced order. The HIT session consisted of 2 min stimuli with an intensity of 100% of peak VO2 interspersed with periods of passive recovery. The average intensities of both exercise sessions were equalized at 85% of RCP. Linear regression analyses of both exercise sessions showed higher prediction values of RPE (CT--R2=.54, p <.01; HIT--R2=.68, p<.01) compared to %VO2 (CT--R2=.04, p=.08; HIT--R2=0.3, p=.12) and %HR (CT--R2=.07, p=.02; HIT--R2=.05, p=.05). Additionally, the results of the linear regression analysis between the Feeling Scale and physiological variables were not significant, indicating that the slope of the regression analysis was not different from zero. These results may be explained by the conscious mental processing required for the manifestation of both the RPE and the affective responses. In conclusion, the affective responses seem to be modulated not only by the intensity of exercise but also mostly by how the individual perceives this intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26556086     DOI: 10.2174/1871527315666151111121924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets        ISSN: 1871-5273            Impact factor:   4.388


  6 in total

1.  Physiological and Psychological Responses during Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training Sessions with Different Work-Recovery Durations.

Authors:  Luiz Fernando Farias-Junior; Geovani Araújo Dantas Macêdo; Rodrigo Alberto Vieira Browne; Yuri Alberto Freire; Filipe Fernandes Oliveira-Dantas; Daniel Schwade; Arnaldo Luis Mortatti; Tony Meireles Santos; Eduardo Caldas Costa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Perceptual and Cardiorespiratory Responses to High-Intensity Interval Exercise in Adolescents: Does Work Intensity Matter?

Authors:  Adam A Malik; Craig A Williams; Kathryn L Weston; Alan R Barker
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Affective and enjoyment responses in high intensity interval training and continuous training: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho Oliveira; Tony Meireles Santos; Marcus Kilpatrick; Flávio Oliveira Pires; Andréa Camaz Deslandes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Feeling of Pleasure to High-Intensity Interval Exercise Is Dependent of the Number of Work Bouts and Physical Activity Status.

Authors:  Danniel Thiago Frazão; Luiz Fernando de Farias Junior; Teresa Cristina Batista Dantas; Kleverton Krinski; Hassan Mohamed Elsangedy; Jonato Prestes; Sarah J Hardcastle; Eduardo Caldas Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cerebral Regulation in Different Maximal Aerobic Exercise Modes.

Authors:  Flávio O Pires; Carlos A S Dos Anjos; Roberto J M Covolan; Fabiano A Pinheiro; Alan St Clair Gibson; Timothy D Noakes; Fernando H Magalhães; Carlos Ugrinowitsch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  A Study Using Power Cycling on the Affective Responses of a Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training to Male Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes in Different Physical Activity Status.

Authors:  Jun Li; Ruichen Jiang; Wei Cheng; Haifeng Ma
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 2.682

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.