Literature DB >> 30787657

Comparison of Quadriceps and Hamstring Muscle Activity during an Isometric Squat between Strength-Matched Men and Women.

Sophia Nimphius1, Jeffrey M McBride2, Paige E Rice1,2, Courtney L Goodman-Capps2, Christopher R Capps2.   

Abstract

The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine whether strength-matched men and women exhibit a different magnitude and ratio of leg muscle activity during a maximal voluntary isometric squat. The secondary purpose was to assess the effect of normalization method on differences in strength between men and women. Thirty-two men (n = 16) and women (n = 16) were successfully strength-matched (≤10% difference) by maximal force produced during an isometric squat (IS) when normalized to body weight. Subjects first performed a maximal isometric knee extension (IKE) and knee flexion (IKF) followed by the IS and muscle activity (EMGmax) was recorded for the vastus medialis (VMO), vastus lateralis (VL), semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris (BF). Muscle activity during the IS was expressed relative to the maximums observed during the IKE and IKF (%EMGmax). The results indicate that VMO, VL, ST and BF %EMGmax were not significantly different (p > 0.05) between men and women during the IS (Men VMO = 136.7 ± 24.9%, Women VMO = 157.1 ± 59.8%, Men VL = 126.2 ± 38.2%, Women VL = 128.1 ± 35.5%, Men ST = 25.5 ± 13.6%, Women ST = 25.2 ± 21.8%, Men BF = 46.1 ± 26.0%, Women BF = 42.2 ± 24.8%). Furthermore, the VMO:VL and hamstring to quadriceps (H:Q) %EMGmax ratio were not significantly different between groups in the IS (Men VMO:VL = 1.15 ± 0.28, Women VMO:VL = 1.22 ± 0.26, Men H:Q = 0.28 ± 0.14, Women H:Q = 0.24 ± 0.20). This investigation indicates that the magnitude of muscle activity and the ratios examined are not significantly different between men and women in a maximal voluntary isometric squat when matched for normalized strength. Future investigations should consider subject strength and normalization procedures in the experimental design to elucidate possible sex differences in neuromuscular performance capabilities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee extension; agonist; antagonist; knee flexion

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30787657      PMCID: PMC6370970     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  35 in total

1.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures.

Authors:  H J Hermens; B Freriks; C Disselhorst-Klug; G Rau
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Force-velocity relations and fiber composition in human knee extensor muscles.

Authors:  A Thorstensson; G Grimby; J Karlsson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Muscle activation during lower body resistance training.

Authors:  W P Ebben; C R Feldmann; A Dayne; D Mitsche; P Alexander; K J Knetzger
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.118

4.  Sex differences in quadriceps and hamstrings EMG-moment relationships.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Glenn N Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Scaling isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength in division I Athletes: are we meeting the assumptions?

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.832

6.  Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps femoris electromyographic activity between men and women during a single-limb squat on both a stable and labile surface.

Authors:  James W Youdas; John H Hollman; James R Hitchcock; Gregory J Hoyme; Jeremiah J Johnsen
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Influence of joint position on electromyographic and torque generation during maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the hamstrings and gluteus maximus muscles.

Authors:  T W Worrell; G Karst; D Adamczyk; R Moore; C Stanley; B Steimel; S Steimel
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Differences in kinematics and electromyographic activity between men and women during the single-legged squat.

Authors:  Brian L Zeller; Jean L McCrory; W Ben Kibler; Timothy L Uhl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Men are more fatigable than strength-matched women when performing intermittent submaximal contractions.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter; Ashley Critchlow; In-Sik Shin; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-02-13

10.  Hamstring activation during lower body resistance training exercises.

Authors:  William P Ebben
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.010

View more
  10 in total

1.  Muscle Activation Patterns of the Proximal Medial and Distal Biceps Femoris and Gluteus Maximus Among 6 Hip Extension and Knee Flexion Exercises in Trained Women.

Authors:  Bryn M Stevens; Ben R Nichols; Holly I Doty; J Adam Korak
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-08-01

2.  Regional neuromuscular regulation within rectus femoris muscle following three-month limb-loaded walking in older adults.

Authors:  Shideh Narouei; Hiroyasu Akatsu; Kohei Watanabe
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2021-12-14

3.  Femur Length is Correlated with Isometric Quadriceps Strength in Post-Operative Patients.

Authors:  Robert S Dean; Nicholas N DePhillipo; Michael T Kiely; Nicole A Schwery; Jill K Monson; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 4.  Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Australian football: should women and girls be playing? You're asking the wrong question.

Authors:  Aaron Fox; Jason Bonacci; Samantha Hoffmann; Sophia Nimphius; Natalie Saunders
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-04-09

5.  Absolute and Relative Strength, Power and Physiological Characteristics of Indian Junior National-Level Judokas.

Authors:  Dale M Harris; Kristina Kendall; G Gregory Haff; Christopher Latella
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-28

6.  COVID-19 Surveillance and Competition in Sport: Utilizing Sport Science to Protect Athletes and Staff during and after the Pandemic.

Authors:  Joshua Hagen; Jason D Stone; W Guy Hornsby; Mark Stephenson; Robert Mangine; Michael Joseph; Scott Galster
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2020-09-03

7.  Test Re-test Reliability of Single and Multijoint Strength Properties in Female Australian Footballers.

Authors:  Daniel Kadlec; Matthew J Jordan; Leanne Snyder; Jacqueline Alderson; Sophia Nimphius
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-01-09

8.  Relationships between physical characteristics and biomechanics of lower extremity during the squat.

Authors:  Sukbum Kim; Michael Miller; Ashley Tallarico; Sara Helder; Yuanlong Liu; Sangwoo Lee
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.103

9.  Effects of trunk anterior tilt and knee joint flexion angle changes on muscle activity in the lower limb muscles.

Authors:  Hideaki Muraoka; Toshiaki Suzuki
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Countermovement Jump Force-Time Curve Analysis between Strength-Matched Male and Female Soccer Players.

Authors:  Christopher Thomas; Paul A Jones; Thomas Dos'Santos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.