| Literature DB >> 30787510 |
Usha Shenoy1, Vigil Peter1, Philip Mathew2, Tom Thomas3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a technique proposed to minimise pain after anterior iliac crest bone harvesting. This study aims to evaluate the postoperative pain in patients who receive ultrasound-guided TAP block to supplement routine wound infiltration.Entities:
Keywords: Early ambulation; TAP block; iliac crest bone graft harvesting; pain postoperative
Year: 2018 PMID: 30787510 PMCID: PMC6360909 DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_62_17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ISSN: 0970-9185
Figure 1CONSORT diagram for the flow of participants through each stage
Comparison of the patient characteristics in the two groups
| Patient group characteristics | Group | Frequency | Mean | Standard deviation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | A | 71 | 10.9 | 5.4 | 0.76 |
| B | 72 | 10.6 | 6.4 | ||
| Weight (kg) | A | 71 | 28.9 | 10.4 | 0.70 |
| B | 72 | 29.7 | 13.5 | ||
| Height (cm) | A | 71 | 133.4 | 20.7 | 0.25 |
| B | 72 | 129.5 | 19.5 |
Comparison of the FLACC scores in the two groups in first postoperative hour
| Time after extubation | Group | Frequency | Mean | SD | Median | Percentile | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th | 75th | |||||||
| 10 min | A | 71 | 0.82 | 1.67 | 0.001 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| B | 72 | 1.82 | 2.0 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.50 | ||
| 20 min | A | 71 | 0.93 | 1.32 | 0.050 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| B | 72 | 1.49 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.50 | ||
| 30 min | A | 71 | 0.96 | 1.22 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| B | 72 | 0.81 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | ||
| 40 min | A | 71 | 0.77 | 1.10 | 0.693 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| B | 72 | 0.69 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | ||
| 50 min | A | 71 | 0.59 | 0.87 | 0.706 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| B | 72 | 0.53 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 60 min | A | 71 | 0.63 | 0.87 | 0.529 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| B | 72 | 0.53 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
Comparison of the WATCHA scale in the two groups in first postoperative hour
| Time after extubation | Group | Frequency | Mean | SD | P | Median | Percentile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th | 75th | |||||||
| 10 min | A | 71 | 0.94 | 1.03 | 0.001 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| B | 72 | 1.67 | 1.16 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.75 | ||
| 20 min | A | 71 | 1.15 | 0.87 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| B | 72 | 1.42 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | ||
| 30 min | A | 71 | 1.30 | 1.25 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| B | 72 | 1.24 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| 40 min | A | 71 | 0.99 | 0.55 | 0.14 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| B | 72 | 1.13 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| 50 min | A | 71 | 0.90 | 0.51 | 0.11 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| B | 72 | 1.03 | 0.41 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| 60 min | A | 71 | 0.85 | 0.53 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| B | 72 | 0.94 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Figure 2Comparison of the Watcha and FLACC scores in the first postoperative hour
Comparison of the timing of first rescue analgesic administration in the two groups
| Timing of rescue analgesics | Group | Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-3 h | A | 0 | 0 | 0.31 |
| B | 1 | 1.4 | ||
| 3-6 h | A | 9 | 12.7 | 0.13 |
| B | 16 | 22.2 | ||
| 6-12 h | A | 61 | 85.9 | 0.07 |
| B | 53 | 73.6 | ||
| 12-24 h | A | 1 | 1.4 | 0.57 |
| B | 2 | 2.8 |
Figure 3Comparison of pain scores in the two groups after 24 h
Comparison of the pain and cumulated ambulation scores (CAS) in the two groups 24 h later
| Pain scoring | Group | Frequency | Percentage | CAS | Group | Frequency | Percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | A | 58 | 81.7 | 0.004 | 6 | A | 56 | 78.8 | 0.01 |
| B | 43 | 59.7 | B | 43 | 60.6 | ||||
| 1 | A | 4 | 5.6 | 0.06 | 5 | A | 7 | 9.9 | 0.001 |
| B | 11 | 15.3 | B | 5 | 6.9 | ||||
| 2 | A | 5 | 7.04 | 0.71 | 4 | A | 7 | 9.9 | 0.01 |
| B | 4 | 5.6 | B | 8 | 11.1 | ||||
| 3 | A | 4 | 5.6 | 0.09 | 3 | A | 1 | 1.4 | 0.01 |
| B | 10 | 13.9 | B | 6 | 8.3 | ||||
| 4 | A | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 2 | A | 0 | 0 | 0.01 |
| B | 4 | 5.6 | B | 6 | 8.3 | ||||
| 1 | A | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | |||||
| B | 4 | 5.6 | |||||||
Figure 4Comparison of ambulation scores (CAS) in the two groups after 24 h