Purpose: To develop and assess a method for predicting the likelihood of converting from early/intermediate to advanced wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and methods of deep learning. Methods: Seventy-one eyes of 71 patients with confirmed early/intermediate AMD with contralateral wet AMD were imaged with OCT three times over 2 years (baseline, year 1, year 2). These eyes were divided into two groups: eyes that had not converted to wet AMD (n = 40) at year 2 and those that had (n = 31). Two deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) were evaluated using 5-fold cross validation on the OCT data at baseline to attempt to predict which eyes would convert to advanced AMD at year 2: (1) VGG16, a popular CNN for image recognition was fine-tuned, and (2) a novel, simplified CNN architecture was trained from scratch. Preprocessing was added in the form of a segmentation-based normalization to reduce variance in the data and improve performance. Results: Our new architecture, AMDnet, with preprocessing, achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.89 at the B-scan level and 0.91 for volumes. Results for VGG16, an established CNN architecture, with preprocessing were 0.82 for B-scans/0.87 for volumes versus 0.66 for B-scans/0.69 for volumes without preprocessing. Conclusions: A CNN with layer segmentation-based preprocessing shows strong predictive power for the progression of early/intermediate AMD to advanced AMD. Use of the preprocessing was shown to improve performance regardless of the network architecture.
Purpose: To develop and assess a method for predicting the likelihood of converting from early/intermediate to advanced wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and methods of deep learning. Methods: Seventy-one eyes of 71 patients with confirmed early/intermediate AMD with contralateral wet AMD were imaged with OCT three times over 2 years (baseline, year 1, year 2). These eyes were divided into two groups: eyes that had not converted to wet AMD (n = 40) at year 2 and those that had (n = 31). Two deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) were evaluated using 5-fold cross validation on the OCT data at baseline to attempt to predict which eyes would convert to advanced AMD at year 2: (1) VGG16, a popular CNN for image recognition was fine-tuned, and (2) a novel, simplified CNN architecture was trained from scratch. Preprocessing was added in the form of a segmentation-based normalization to reduce variance in the data and improve performance. Results: Our new architecture, AMDnet, with preprocessing, achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.89 at the B-scan level and 0.91 for volumes. Results for VGG16, an established CNN architecture, with preprocessing were 0.82 for B-scans/0.87 for volumes versus 0.66 for B-scans/0.69 for volumes without preprocessing. Conclusions: A CNN with layer segmentation-based preprocessing shows strong predictive power for the progression of early/intermediate AMD to advanced AMD. Use of the preprocessing was shown to improve performance regardless of the network architecture.
Authors: Kathleen Romond; Minhaj Alam; Sasha Kravets; Luis de Sisternes; Theodore Leng; Jennifer I Lim; Daniel Rubin; Joelle A Hallak Journal: Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Date: 2021-08-18
Authors: Antonio Yaghy; Aaron Y Lee; Pearse A Keane; Tiarnan D L Keenan; Luisa S M Mendonca; Cecilia S Lee; Anne Marie Cairns; Joseph Carroll; Hao Chen; Julie Clark; Catherine A Cukras; Luis de Sisternes; Amitha Domalpally; Mary K Durbin; Kerry E Goetz; Felix Grassmann; Jonathan L Haines; Naoto Honda; Zhihong Jewel Hu; Christopher Mody; Luz D Orozco; Cynthia Owsley; Stephen Poor; Charles Reisman; Ramiro Ribeiro; Srinivas R Sadda; Sobha Sivaprasad; Giovanni Staurenghi; Daniel Sw Ting; Santa J Tumminia; Luca Zalunardo; Nadia K Waheed Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 3.770
Authors: Jason Yim; Reena Chopra; Terry Spitz; Jim Winkens; Annette Obika; Christopher Kelly; Harry Askham; Marko Lukic; Josef Huemer; Katrin Fasler; Gabriella Moraes; Clemens Meyer; Marc Wilson; Jonathan Dixon; Cian Hughes; Geraint Rees; Peng T Khaw; Alan Karthikesalingam; Dominic King; Demis Hassabis; Mustafa Suleyman; Trevor Back; Joseph R Ledsam; Pearse A Keane; Jeffrey De Fauw Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Tristan T Hormel; Thomas S Hwang; Steven T Bailey; David J Wilson; David Huang; Yali Jia Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Andrew C Lin; Cecilia S Lee; Marian Blazes; Aaron Y Lee; Michael B Gorin Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Matthias Gutfleisch; Oliver Ester; Sökmen Aydin; Martin Quassowski; Georg Spital; Albrecht Lommatzsch; Kai Rothaus; Adam Michael Dubis; Daniel Pauleikhoff Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2022-01-22 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Wanyun Zhang; Zhijun Chen; Han Zhang; Guannan Su; Rui Chang; Lin Chen; Ying Zhu; Qingfeng Cao; Chunjiang Zhou; Yao Wang; Peizeng Yang Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2021-06-18